Separation of silkworm proteins in cocoon cooking wastewaters via nanofiltration: Effect of solution pH on enrichment of sericin

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 389, Issue , 2012, Pages 509-521

  Capar, Goksen ^a,b  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Nanofiltration; PH; Protein; Separation; Sericin

Indexed keywords

ACIDIC CONDITIONS; ACIDIC PH; ALKALINE CONDITIONS; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; FLUX DECLINE; FOULING PROBLEMS; FOULING RESISTANCE; HIGH QUALITY; NF MEMBRANES; PH ADJUSTMENT; PROCESS CONDITION; RETENTATE; SERICIN; SOLUTION PH; TOTAL RESISTANCE; TWO-STAGE PROCESS; VOLUME REDUCTION FACTOR;

ALKALINITY; ANIMALS; CONTAMINATION; ETHANOL; IONIC STRENGTH; NANOFILTRATION; PH; PROTEINS; SEPARATION; WASTEWATER; WATER FILTRATION;

PH EFFECTS;

SERICIN;

ACIDITY; ALKALINITY; ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; COCOON; COOKING; IONIC STRENGTH; NANOFILTRATION; PH; PRECIPITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; WASTE WATER;

EID: 83855161529     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Charcosset C. Membrane processes in biotechnology: an overview. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24:482-492.
2. Zeman L.J., Zydney A.L. Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration. Principles and Applications 1996, Marcel Dekker, New York.
3. Datta D., Bhattacharjee S., Nath A., Das R., Bhattacharjee C., Datta S. Separation of ovalbumin from chicken egg white using two-stage ultrafiltration technique. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 66:353-361.
4. Fabiani C., Pizzichini M., Spadoni M., Zeddita G. Treatment ofwastewater from silk degumming processes for protein recovery and water reuse. Desalination 1996, 105:1-9.
5. Capar G., Aygun S.S., Gecit M.R. Treatment of silk production wastewaters by membrane processes for sericin recovery. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:920-931.
6. Capar G., Aygun S.S., Gecit M.R. Separation of sericin from fatty acids towards its recovery from silk degumming wastewaters. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:179-189.
7. Vaithanomsat P., Kitpreechavanich V. Sericin separation from silk degumming wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 59:129-133.
8. S.S. Aygun, Recovery of sericin protein from silk processing wastewaters by membrane technology. Master of Science's Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2008.
9. Golunski S., Astolfi V., Carniel N., De Oliveira D., Di Luccio M., Mazutti M.A., Treichel H. Ethanol precipitation and ultrafiltration of inulinases from Kluyveromyces marxianus. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 78:261-265.
10. Rabiller-Baudry M., Chaufer B., Lucas D., Michel F. Ultrafiltration of mixed protein solutions of lysozyme and lactoferrin: role of modified inorganic membranes and ionic strength on the selectivity. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 184:137-148.
11. Meng F., Yang F. Fouling mechanisms of deflocculated sludge, normal sludge, and bulking sludge in membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 305:48-56.
12. Zhang Y.Q. Applications of natural silk protein sericin in biomaterials. Biotechnol. Adv. 2002, 20:91-101.
13. Wu J.H., Wang Z., Xu S.Y. Preparation and characterization of sericin powder extracted from silk industry wastewater. Food Chem. 2007, 103:1255-1262.
14. Favre-Reguillon A., Lebuzit G., Murat D., Foo J., Mansour C., Draye M. Selective removal of dissolved uranium in drinking water by nanofiltration. Water Res. 2008, 42:1160-1166.
15. Mazzoni C., Bandini S. On nanofiltration Desal-5 DK performances with calcium chloride-water solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52:232-240.
16. Sbai M., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Sorin A., Vidonne A., Pellet-Rostaing S., Favre-Reguillon A., Lemaire M. Influence of the membrane pore conductance on tangential streaming potential. Langmuir 2003, 19:8867-8871.
17. Tanninen J., Nystrom M. Separation of ions in acidic conditions using NF. Desalination 2002, 147:295-299.
18. Becht N.O., Malik D.J., Tarleton E.S. Evaluation and comparison of protein ultrafiltration test results: dead-end stirred cell compared with a cross-flowsystem. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 62:228-239.
19. Howell J.A., Wu D., Field R.W. Transmission of bovine albumin under controlled flux ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 152:117-127.
20. Ricq L., Narc S., Reggiani J.C., Pagetti J. Streaming potential and protein transmission ultrafiltration of single proteins and proteins in mixture: blactoglobulin and lysozyme. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:81-96.
21. Huisman I.H., Pradanos P., Hernandez A. The effect of protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions on membrane fouling in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 179:79-90.
22. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment - a literature review. Water Res. 2004, 38:2795-2809.
23. Kodama K. The preparation and physico-chemical properties of sericin. Biochem. J. 1926, 20:1208-1222.
24. Saksena S., Zydney A.L. Influence of protein-protein interactions on bulk mass transport during ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 125:93-108.
25. Opong W.S., Zydney A.L. Diffusive and convective protein transport through asymmetric membranes. AIChE J. 1991, 37:1497.
26. Nakatsuka S., Michaels A.S. Transport and separation of proteins by ultrafiltration through sorptive and non-sorptive membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 69:189.
27. Garem A., Daufin G., Maubois J.L., Chaufer B., Léonil J. Ionic interactions in nanofiltration of β-casein peptides. Biotech. Bioeng. 1998, 57:109.
28. Nghiem L.D., Schafer A., Elimelech M. Role of electrostatic interactions in the retention of pharmaceutically active contaminants by a loose nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:52-59.
29. Millesime L., Dulieu J., Chaufer B. Protein retention with modified and unmodified inorganic ultrafiltration membranes: model of ionic strength controlled retention. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 108(1-2):143-159.
30. Chan R., Chen V. The effects of electrolyte concentration and pH on protein aggregation and deposition: critical flux and constant flux membrane filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 185:177-192.
31. Zulkali M.M.D., Ahmad A.L., Derek C.J.C. Membrane application in proteomic studies: preliminary studies on the effect of pH, ionic strength and pressure on protein fractionation. Desalination 2005, 179:381-390.
32. Ang W.S., Elimelech M. Fatty acid fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation. Water Res. 2008, 42:4393-4403.
33. Oh H., Young J., Kim M.K., Um I.C., Lee K.H. Refining hot-water extracted silk sericin by ethanol-induced precipitation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48:32-37.
34. Cui L., Du G., Zhang D., Liu H., Chen J. Purification and characterization of transglutaminase from a newly isolated Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Food Chem. 2007, 105:612-618.
35. Cortez E.V., Pessoa A. Xylanase and b-xylosidase separation by fractional precipitation. Process Biochem. 1999, 35:277-283.