Evaluation and comparison of protein ultrafiltration test results: Dead-end stirred cell compared with a cross-flow system

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 228-239

  Becht, N O ^a   Malik, D J ^a   Tarleton, E S ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cross flow; Proteins; Stagnant film model; Stirred cell; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

HYDRODYNAMICS; IONIC STRENGTH; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PECLET NUMBER; POLYETHERS; POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; SEPARATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CROSS-FLOW SYSTEM; INDUSTRIAL FEED STREAMS; STAGNANT FILM MODEL; STIRRED-CELL;

PROTEINS;

BOVINAE;

EID: 44749088408     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Burns D.B., and Zydney A.L. Effect of solution pH on protein transport through ultrafiltration membranes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 64 (1999) 27-37
2. Ehsani N., Parkinnen S., and Nyström M. Fractionation of natural and model egg-white protein solutions with modified and unmodified polysulfone UF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 123 (1997) 105-119
3. Iritani E., Mukai Y., and Murase T. Separation of binary protein mixtures by ultrafiltration. Filtr. Separat. 34 (1997) 967-973
4. Nyström M., Aimar P., Luque S., Kulovaara M., and Metsamuuronen S. Fractionation of model proteins using their physiochemical properties. Colloids Surf. A 138 (1998) 185-205
5. Saksena S., and Zydney A.L. Effect of solution pH and ionic-strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (Igg) by selective filtration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43 (1994) 960-968
6. van Eijndhoven R.H.C.M., Saksena S., and Zydney A.L. Protein fractionation using electrostatic interactions in membrane filtration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 48 (1995) 406-414
7. Salgin S. Effects of ionic environments on bovine serum albumin fouling in a cross-flow ultrafiltration system. Chem. Eng. Technol. 30 (2007) 77-86
8. Ghosh R., and Cui Z.F. Fractionation of BSA and lysozyme using ultrafiltration: effect of pH and membrane pretreatment. J. Membr. Sci. 139 (1998) 17-28
9. Faibish R.S., Elimelech M., and Cohen Y. Effect of interparticle electrostatic double layer interactions on permeate flux decline in cross-flow membrane filtration of colloidal suspensions: an experimental investigation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 204 (1998) 77-86
10. Nyström M., Aimar P., Luque S., Kulovaara M., and Metsämuuronen S. Fractionation of model proteins using their physiochemical properties. Colloids Surf. A 138 (1998) 185-205
11. Mosqueda-Jimenez D.B., Narbaitz R.M., and Matsuura T. Membrane fouling test: apparatus evaluation. J. Environ. Eng. 130 (2004) 90-99
12. Schipolowski T., Jezowska A., and Wozny G. Reliability of membrane test cell measurements. Desalination 189 (2006) 71-80
13. Tansel B., Sager J., Rector T., Garland J., Strayer R.F., Levine L., Roberts M., Hummerick M., and Bauer J. Significance of hydrated radius and hydration shells on ionic permeability during nanofiltration in dead end and cross-flow modes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 51 (2006) 40-47
14. Tarabara V.V., Koyuncu I., and Wiesner M.R. Effect of hydrodynamics and solution ionic strength on permeate flux in cross-flow filtration: direct experimental observation of filter cake cross-sections. J. Membr. Sci. 241 (2004) 67-78
15. Zydney A.L., and Xenopoulos A. Improving dextran tests for ultrafiltration membranes: effect of device format. J. Membr. Sci. 291 (2007) 180-190
16. In: Perry R.H., and Green D.W. (Eds). Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (1997), McGraw-Hill, New York
17. Kosvintsev S.R., Gasparini G., Holdich R.G., Cumming I.W., and Stillwell M.T. Liquid-liquid membrane dispersion in a stirred cell with and without controlled shear. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 9323-9330
18. Middleman S. An introduction to mass and heat transfer: principles of analysis and design (1998), John Wiley & Sons, New York
19. Landau L.D., and Lifshitz E.M. Fluid Mechanics (1959), Pergamon Press, London
20. Pujar N.S., and Zydney A.L. Electrostatic effects on protein partitioning in size-exclusion chromatography and membrane ultrafiltration. J. Chromatogr. A 796 (1998) 229-238
21. Mochizuki S., and Zydney A.L. Effect of protein adsorption on the transport characteristics of asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes. Biotechnol. Prog. (1992) 553-561
22. Mehta A., and Zydney A.L. Effect of membrane charge on flow and protein transport during ultrafiltration. Biotechnol. Prog. (2006) 484-492
23. Blatt W.F., Dravid A., Michaels A.S., and Nelsen L. Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: consequences, and control techniques. Membrane Science and Technology-Industrial, Biological, and Waste Treatment Processes (1970), Plenum Press, New York pp. 47-97
24. Granath K.A., and Kvist B.E. Molecular weight distribution analysis by gel chromatography on sephadex. J. Chromatogr. 28 (1967) 68-81
25. Squire P.G. Calculation of hydrodynamic parameters of random coil polymers from size exclusion chromatography and comparison with parameters by conventional methods. J. Chromatogr. 210 (1981) 433-442
26. Pujar N.S., and Zydney A.L. Electrostatic and electrokinetic interactions during protein transport through narrow pore membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33 (1994) 2473-2482
27. Müller C.H., Agarwal G.P., Melin T., and Wintgens T. Study of ultrafiltration of a single and binary protein solution in a thin spiral channel module. J. Membr. Sci. 227 (2003) 51-69