Species delimitation and global biosecurity

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Volumn 2011, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1-37

  Boykin, Laura M ^a   Armstrong, Karen F ^a   Kubatko, Laura ^b   de Barro, Paul ^c  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOSAFETY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENEALOGICAL SORTING INDEX; GENERAL MIXED YULE COALESCENT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GLOBAL BIOSECURITY; GYPSY MOTH; INVASIVE SPECIES; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; ROSENBERG RECIPROCAL MONOPHYLY; SPECIES DELIMITATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; SWEET POTATO WHITEFLY; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

EID: 83655197547     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11769343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/EBO.S8532     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Rosenberg NA. Statistical tests for taxonomic distinctiveness from observations of monophyly. Evolution. 2007;61(2):317-23.
2. Rodrigo A, Bertels F, Heled J, Noder R, Shearman H, Tsai P. The perils of plenty: what are we going to do with all these genes? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1512):3893-902.
3. Cummings MP, Neel MC, Shaw KL. A genealogical approach to quantifying lineage divergence. Evolution. 2008;62(9):2411-22.
4. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, et al. Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst Biol. 2006; 55(4):595-609.
5. Monaghan MT, Wild R, Elliot M, et al. Accelerated species inventory on Madagascar using coalescent-based models of species delineation. Syst Biol. 2009;58(3):298-311.
6. Mayr E. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia: University Press; 1942.
7. De Queiroz K. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102 Suppl 1:6600-7.
8. Hey J. On the failure of modern species concepts. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21(8):447-50.
9. De Queiroz K. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst Biol. 2007; 56(6):879-86.
10. Wiens JJ, Servedio MR. Species delimitation in systematics: inferring diagnostic differences between species. Proc Biol Sci. 2000;267(1444): 631-6.
11. De Queiroz K. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria and the process of speciation. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, editors. Endless forms Species and Speciation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998:57-75.
12. Frost DR, Kluge AR. A consideration of epistemology in systematic biology, with special reference to species. Cladistics. 1994;10:259-94.
13. Nixon KC, Wheeler WC. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics. 1990;6:211-23.
14. Sites JW, Marshall JC. Delimiting species: a Renaissance issue in systematic biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18(9):462-70.
15. Sites JW, Marshall JC. Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2004;35:199-227.
16. Armstrong KF, Ball SL. DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360(1462):1813-23.
17. Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(1512):313-21.
18. Floyd R, Lima J, deWaard JR, Humble LM, Hanner RH. Common goals: policy implications of DNA barcoding as a protocol for identification of arthropod pests. Biol Invasions. 2010;12(9):2947-54.
19. Jérôme M, Lemaire C, Verrez-Bagnis V, Etienne M. Direct sequencing method for species identification of canned sardine and sardine-type products. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(25):7326-32.
20. Sullivan JP, Lavoue S, Hopkins CD. Discovery and phylogenetic analysis of a riverine species flock of African electric fishes (Mormyridae: Teleostei). Evolution. 2002;56(3):597-616.
21. Abebe E, Mekete T, Thomas WK. A critique of current methods in nematode taxonomy. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(3):312-23.
22. Floyd R, Abebe E, Papert A, Blaxter M. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Mol Ecol. 2002;11(4):839-50.
23. Goker M, Garcia-Blazquez G, Voglmayr H, Telleria MT, Martin MP. Molecular taxonomy of phytopathogenic fungi: a case study in Peronospora. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6319.
24. Grube M, Kroken S. Molecular approaches and the concept of species and species complexes in lichenized fungi. Mycol Res. 2000;104(11): 1284-94.
25. Barraclough TG, Hughes M, Ashford-Hodges N, Fujisawa T. Inferring evolutionarily significant units of bacterial diversity from broad environmental surveys of single-locus data. Biol Lett. 2009;5(3):425-8.
26. Janda JM, Abbott SL. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(9):2761-4.
27. Carstens BC, Dewey TA. Species delimitation using a combined coalescent and information-theoretic approach: an example from North American Myotis bats. Syst Biol. 2010;59(4):400-14.
28. O'Meara BC. New heuristic methods for joint species delimitation and species tree inference. Syst Biol. 2010;59(1):59-73.
29. Yang Z, Rannala B. Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(20):9264-9.
30. Goker M, Grimm GW, Auch AF, Aurahs R, Kucera M. A Clustering Optimization Strategy for Molecular Taxonomy Applied to Planktonic Foraminifera SSU rDNA. Evol Bioinformatics. 2010;6:97-112.
31. Ross HA, Murugan S, Li WL. Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation. Syst Biol. 2008;57(2):216-30.
32. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16(2):111-20.
33. Cywinska A, Hunter FF, Hebert PD. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med Vet Entomol. 2006;20(4):413-24.
34. Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Hallwachs W, Hebert PD. Dna barcodes of closely related (but morpholigcally and ecologically distinct) species of skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae) can differ by only one to three nucleotides. J of Lep Soc. 2007;61(3):138-53.
35. Meyer CP, Paulay G. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(12):e422.
36. Nielsen R, Matz M. Statistical approaches for DNA barcoding. Syst Biol. 2006;55(1):162-9.
37. Knowles LL, Kubatko LS, editors. Estimating Species Trees. Practical and Theoretical Aspects: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
38. Kubatko LS. Identifying hybridization events in the presence of coalescence via model selection. Syst Biol. 2009;58(5):478-88.
39. Kubatko LS, Carstens BC, Knowles LL. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(7):971-3.
40. Huang H, He Q, Kubatko LS, Knowles LL. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods. Syst Biol. 2010;59(5):573-83.
41. Liu L. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(21):2542-3.
42. Liu L, Yu L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst Biol. 2009;58(5):468-77.
43. Ane C, Larget B, Baum DA, Smith SD, Rokas A. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(2):412-26.
44. Than C, Nakhleh L. Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5(9):e1000501.
45. Than C, Ruths D, Nakhleh L. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:322.
46. Than C, Sugino R, Innan H, Nakhleh L. Efficient inference of bacterial strain trees from genome-scale multilocus data. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(13): i123-31.
47. Funk DJ, Omland KE. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34:397-423.
48. Knowles LL, Carstens BC. Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Syst Biol. 2007;56(6):887-95.
49. Belfiore NM, Liu L, Moritz C. Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Syst Biol. 2008;57(2): 294-310.
50. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention, Rome; 2007:341-52.
51. Goldson SL. Biosecurity, risk and policy: a New Zealand perspective. J of Consum Protect and Food Safety. 2011;6:41-7.
52. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. International standards for phytosanitary measures. In: Diagnostic Protocols for Regulated Pests. 2006:27.
53. Rossman AY. The impact of invasive fungi on agricultural ecosystems in the United States. In: Langor DW, Sweeney J, editors. Ecological impacts of Non-Native Invertebrates and Fungi on Terrestrial Ecosystems. U.S. Government; 2008:97-107.
54. Carnegie AJ, Lidbetter JR, Walker J, et al. Uredo rangelii, a taxon in the guava rust complex, newly recorded on Myrtaceae in Australia. Australas Plant Path. 2010;39:463-6.
55. Simpson JA, Thomas K, Grgurinovic CA. Uredinales species pathogenic on species of Myrtaceae. Australas Plant Path. 2006;35:549-62.
56. Glen M, Alfenas AC, Zauza V, Wingfield MJ, Mohammed C. Puccinia psidii: a threat to the Australian environment and economy-a review. Australas Plant Path. 2007;36:1-16.
57. Ramsfield T, Dick M, Bulman L, Ganley R. Briefing document on myrtle rust, a member of the guava rust complex, and the risk to New Zealand. In: Scion, Next Generation Biomaterials. www.scionresearch.com; 2010.
58. Van der Merwe MM, Walker J, Ericson L, Burdon JJ. Coevolution with higher taxonomic host groups within the Puccinia/Uromyces rust lineage obscured by host jumps. Mycol Res. 2008;112:1387-408.
59. Smith-Caldas MRB, McPheron BA, Silva JG, Zucchi R. Phylogenetic relationships among species of the fracterculus group (Anastrepha: Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I. Neotrop Entomol. 2001;30(4):565-73.
60. Virgilio M, Backeljau T, Barr N, Meyer MD. Molecular evaluation of nominal species in the Ceratitis fasciventris, C. anonae, C. rosa complex (Diptera: Tephritidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008;48(1):270-80.
61. Clarke AR, Armstrong KF, Carmichael AE, et al. Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50: 293-319.
62. Cantrell BK, Chadwick B, Cahill A. Fruit fly fighters: eriadication of papaya fruit fly. In.: CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia; 2002.
63. De Barro PJ, Liu SS, Boykin LM, Dinsdale AB. Bemisia tabaci: A Statement of Species Status. Ann Rev Entomol. 2011;56:1-19.
64. de Waard JR, Mitchell A, Keena MA, et al. Towards a global barcode library for Lymantria (Lepidoptera: Lymantriinae) tussock moths of biosecurity concert. PLoS Biol. 2010;5(12):e14280.
65. Pimental D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. Update of the environmental and economics costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ. 2005;52:273-88.
66. Byrne DN, Bellows TS Jr. Whitefly biology. Ann Rev Entomol. 1991;36: 431-57.
67. Oliveira MRV, Henneberry TJ, Anderson PK. History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Protection. 2001; 20:709-23.
68. Drogue S, Gozlan E. Are SPS-TBT regulations in the European union discriminating agricultural trade from Africa? The case of live plants and cut flowers. Int J Business Res. 2009;9(3):70-91.
69. Boykin LM, Shatters RG Jr, Rosell RC, et al. Global relationships of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) revealed using Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial COI DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;44(3): 1306-19.
70. Dinsdale A, Cook L, Riginos C, Buckley YM, De Barro P. Refined global analysis of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyroidea) mitochondrial CO1 to identify species level genetic boundries. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2010;103(2):196-208.
71. Hu J, De Barro P, Zhao H, Wang J, Nardi F, Liu SS. An extensive field survey combined with a phylogenetic analysis reveals rapid and widespread invasion of two alien whiteflies in China. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16061.
72. Elbaz M, Lahav N, Morin S. Evidence for pre-zygotic reproductive barrier between the B and Q biotypes of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Bull Entomol Res. 2010;100(5):581-90.
73. Liu SS, Colvin J, De Barro P. Species concepts as applied to the whitefly Bemisia tabaci systematics: how many species are there? Agricul Sci in China. 2011;10.
74. Sun DB, Xu J, Luan JB, Liu SS. Reproductive incompatibility between the B and Q biotypes of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci in China: genetic and behavioural evidence. Bull Entomol Res. 2010:1-10.
75. Wang P, Sun DB, Qiu BL, Lui SS. The presence of six cryptic species of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci complex in China as revealed by crossing experiments. Insect Sci. 2011:18(67-77).
76. Wang Z, Yan H, Yang Y, Wu Y. Biotype and insecticide resistance status of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci from China. Pest Manag Sci. 2010;66(12): 1360-6.
77. Xu J, De Barro PJ, Liu SS. Reproductive incompatibility among genetic groups of Bemisia tabaci supports the proposition that the whitefly is a cryptic species complex. Bull Entomol Res. 2010;100(3):359-66.
78. Liebhold AM, Elkinton JS. Gypsy moth dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol. 1991; 6(8):263-4.
79. Liebhold AM, Tobin PC. Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:387-408.
80. Schintlmeister A. The Taxonomy of the genus Lymantria HÜBNER, [1819] (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Quadrifina. 2004;Band 7:1-248.
81. Pogue MG, Schaefer PW. A review of selected species of Lymantria (Hubner [1819]) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Lymantriinae) from subtropical and temperate regions of Asia including the description of three new speces, some potentially invasive to North America. Publication FHTET-2006-7, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado: Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team; 2007.
82. Baranchikov YN. Ecological basis of the evolution of host relationships in Eurasian gypsy moth populations. In: Wallner WE, McManus KA, editors. Proceedings, Lymantriidae: A Comparison of Features of New and Old World Tussock Moths. U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1989.
83. Koshio C. Pre-ovipositional behaviour of female gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae). Appl Entomol Z. 1996;31:1-10.
84. Schaefer PW, Weseloh RM, Sun X, Wallner WE, Yan J. Gypsy moth Lymantria (=Ocneria) dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), in the People's Republic of China. Env Entomol. 1984;13:1535-41.
85. Keena MA, Cote MJ, Grinberg PS, Wallner WE. World distribution of female flight and genetic variation in Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Environ Entomol. 2008;37(3):636-49.
86. Keena MA, Grinberg PS, Wallner WE. Inheritance of female flight in Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Environ Entomol. 2007; 36(2):484-94.
87. Carde RT, Charlton RE, Wallner WE, Baranchikov YN. Pheromone-mediated diel activity rhythms of male Asian gypsy moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in relations to female eclosion and temperature. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1996; 89:745-53.
88. Wallner WE, Humble LM, Levin RE, Baranchikov YN, Carde RT. Response of adult lymantriid moths to illuminiation devices in the Russian Far East. J Econ Entomol. 1995;88:337-42.
89. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572-4.
90. Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci. 1992;7:457-511.
91. Masters BC, Fan V, Ross HA. Species delimitation-a geneious plugin for the exploration of species boundaries. Mol Ecol Resourc. 2010;11(1):154-7.
92. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, et al. Geneious v5.1, Available from: http://www.geneious.com; 2010.
93. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:214.
94. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. Tracer v1.5. [Online]. Available from: http://beastbioedacuk/Tracer; 2007.
95. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Suchard M. LogCombiner v1.5.4 [Online]. Available from: http://beastbioedacuk/LogCombiner; 2010.
96. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Suchard M. TreeAnnotator v1.5.4 [Online]. Available from: http://beastbioedacuk/TreeAnnotator; 2010.
97. Abdo Z, Golding GB. A step toward barcoding life: a model-based, decision-theoretic method to assign genes to preexisting species groups. Syst Biol. 2007;56(1):44-56.
98. Teletchea F. After 7 years and 1000 citations: comparative assessment of the DNA barcoding and the DNA taxonomy proposals for taxonomists and non-taxonomists. Mitochondrial DNA. 2010;21(6):206-26.
99. Armstrong KF. DNA barcoding for plant biosecurity: a new module in New Zealand's diagnostic toolbox. EPPO Bulletin. 2010;40(1):91-100.
100. Prabhaker N, Courdriet DL, Toscano NC. Effect of synergists on organophosphate and permethrin resistance in sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). J Econ Entomol. 1998:81(34-9).
101. De Barro P, Ahmed M. Genetic Networking of the Bemisia tabaci Cryptic Species Complex Reveals Pattern of Biological Invasions. PLoS Biol. 2011;6(10):e25579.
102. Cognato AI. Standard percent DNA sequence difference for insects does not predict species boundaries. J Econ Entomol. 2006;99(4):1037-45.
103. Dasmahapatra KK, Elias M, Hill RI, Hoffman JI, Mallet J. Mitochondrial DNA barcoding detects some species that are real, and some that are not. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(2):264-73.
104. Padial JM, Miralles A, De la Riva I, Vences M. The integrative future of taxonomy. Front Zool. 2010;7:16.
105. Hudson RR, Coyne JA. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution. 2002;56(8):1557-65.
106. Linnen CR, Farrell BD. Mitonuclear discordance is caused by rampant mitochondrial introgression in Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) sawflies. Evolution. 2007;61(6):1417-38.
107. Shaw KL. Conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: what mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(25):16122-7.
108. Bogdanowicz SM, Schaefer PW, Harrison RG. Mitochondrial DNA variation among worldwide populations of gypsy moths, Lymantria dispar. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000;15(3):487-95.
109. Ball SL, Armstrong KF. DNA barcodes for insect pest identification: a test case with tussock moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Can J Forest Res. 2006;36:337-50.
110. Avise JC, Walker D. Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: perspectives from an asexually transmitted genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(3):992-5.
111. Ence DD, Carstens BC. SpedeSTEM: a rapid and accurate method for species delimitation. Mol Ecol Resourc. 2010:1-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02947.x.
112. Kubatko LS, Gibbs HL, Bloomquist EW. Inferring Species-Level Phylogenies and Taxonomic Distinctiveness Using Multilocus Data In Sistrurus Rattlesnakes. Syst Biol. 2011;60(4):393-409.
113. Kingman JFC. The coalescent. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications. 1982;13:235-48.
114. Galtier N, Nabholz B, Glemin S, Hurst GD. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol Ecol. 2009;18(22): 4541-50.
115. Gueguen G, Vavre F, Gnankine O, et al. Endosymbiont metacommunities, mtDNA diversity and the evolution of the Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) species complex. Mol Ecol. 2010;(19):4365-76.
116. Forister ML, Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Compert Z, Shapiro AM. Considering evolutionary processes in the use of single-locus genetic data for conservation, with examples from the Lepidoptera. J of Insect Conserv. 2008;12:37-51.
117. Gompert Z, Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Forister ML, Shapiro AM. Identifying units for conservation using molecular systematics: the cautionary tale of the Karner blue butterfly. Mol Ecol. 2006;15(7):1759-68.
118. Heled J, Drummond AJ. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(3):570-80.
119. Waage JK, Mumford JD. Agricultural biosecurity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1492):863-76.