Developmental plasticity, morphological variation and evolvability: A multilevel analysis of morphometric integration in the shape of compound leaves

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 115-129

  Klingenberg, C P ^a   Duttke, S ^b   Whelan, S ^a   Kim, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allometry; Compound leaf; Fluctuating asymmetry; Geometric morphometrics; Leaf shape; Phylogenetic uncertainty; Plasticity; Principal component analysis; Procrustes fit; Rosaceae

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; BOOTSTRAPPING; DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; PHYLOGENETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SHRUB; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT LEAF; POTENTILLA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT LEAVES; POTENTILLA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

POTENTILLA; ROSACEAE;

EID: 83555179120     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02410.x     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Albarrán-Lara, A.L., Mendoza-Cuenca, L., Valencia-Avalos, S., González-Rodríguez, A. & Oyama, K. 2010. Leaf fluctuating asymmetry increases with hybridization and introgression between Quercus magnoliifolia and Quercus resinosa (Fagaceae) through an altitudinal gradient in Mexico. Int. J. Plant Sci. 171: 310-322.
2. Arthur, W. 2001. Developmental drive: an important determinant of the direction of phenotypic evolution. Evol. Dev. 3: 271-278.
3. Bensmihen, S., Hanna, A.I., Langlade, N.B., Micol, J.L., Bangham, A. & Coen, E. 2008. Mutational spaces for leaf shape and size. HFSP J. 2: 110-120.
4. Blein, T., Pulido, A., Vialette-Guiraud, A., Nikovics, K., Morin, H., Hay, A. et al. 2008. A conserved molecular framework for compound leaf development. Science 322: 1835-1839.
5. Breuker, C.J., Patterson, J.S. & Klingenberg, C.P. 2006. A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape. PLoS ONE 1: e7.
6. Campbell, N.A. & Atchley, W.R. 1981. The geometry of canonical variate analysis. Syst. Zool. 30: 268-280.
7. Cheverud, J.M. 1982. Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 59: 139-149.
8. Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray, London.
9. Debat, V., Alibert, P., David, P., Paradis, E. & Auffray, J.-C. 2000. Independence between developmental stability and canalization in the skull of the house mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267: 423-430.
10. Dobeš, C. & Paule, J. 2010. A comprehensive chloroplast DNA-based phylogeny of the genus Potentilla (Rosaceae): implications for its geographic origin, phylogeography and generic circumscription. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 56: 156-175.
11. Drake, A.G. & Klingenberg, C.P. 2008. The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St. Bernard dogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275: 71-76.
12. Drake, A.G. & Klingenberg, C.P. 2010. Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am. Nat. 175: 289-301.
13. Dryden, I.L. & Mardia, K.V. 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
14. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York.
15. Efroni, I., Eshed, Y. & Lifschitz, E. 2010. Morphogenesis of simple and compound leaves: a critical review. Plant Cell 22: 1019-1032.
16. Eriksson, T., Hibbs, M.S., Yoder, A.D., Delwiche, C.F. & Donoghue, M.J. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the TRNL/F region of chloroplast DNA. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 197-211.
17. Felsenstein, J. 1985a. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1985b. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
19. Feng, X., Wilson, Y., Bowers, J., Kennaway, R., Bangham, A., Hannah, A. et al. 2009. Evolution of allometry in Antirrhinum. Plant Cell 21: 2999-3007.
20. Figueirido, B., Serrano-Alarcón, F.J., Slater, G.J. & Palmqvist, P. 2010. Shape at the cross-roads: homoplasy and history in the evolution of the carnivoran skull towards herbivory. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 2579-2594.
21. Freeman, D.C., Brown, M.L., Dobson, M., Jordan, Y., Kizy, A., Micallef, C. et al. 2003. Developmental instability: measures of resistance and resilience using pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 78: 27-41.
22. Goldblatt, P. & Johnson, D.E. (eds) 1979. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO.
23. Goodall, C.R. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 53: 285-339.
24. Hansen, K.T., Elven, R. & Brochmann, C. 2000. Molecules and morphology in concert: tests of some hypotheses in arctic Potentilla (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87: 1466-1479.
25. Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Parnis, A., Eshed, Y. & Lifschitz, E. 1996. The making of a compound leaf: genetic manipulation of leaf architecture in tomato. Cell 84: 735-744.
26. Hasson, A., Blein, T. & Laufs, P. 2010. Leaving the meristem behind: the genetic and mlecular control of leaf patterning and morphogenesis. C. R. Biol. 333: 350-360.
27. Hay, A. & Tsiantis, M. 2006. The genetic basis for differences in leaf form between Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relative Cardamine hirsuta. Nat. Genet. 38: 942-947.
28. Hay, A., Barkoulas, M. & Tsiantis, M. 2006. ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and auxin activities converge to repress BREVIPEDICELLUS expression and promote leaf development in Arabidopsis. Development (Camb.) 133: 3955-3961.
29. Huber, H. 1996. Plasticity of internodes and petioles in prostrate and erect Potentilla species. Funct. Ecol. 10: 401-409.
30. Hunt, G. 2007. Evolutionary divergence in directions of high phenotypic variance in the ostracode genus Poseidonamicus. Evolution 61: 1560-1576.
31. Ivanović, A. & Kalezić, M.L. 2010. Testing the hypothesis of morphological integration on a skull of a vertebrate with a biphasic life cycle: a case study of the alpine newt. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 314: 527-538.
32. Janssen, B.-J., Lund, L. & Sinha, N. 1998. Overexpression of a homeobox gene, LeT6, reveals indeterminate features in the tomato compound leaf. Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 117: 771-786.
33. Jensen, R.J. 1990. Detecting shape variation in oak leaf morphology: a comparison of rotational-fit methods. Am. J. Bot. 77: 1279-1293.
34. Jensen, R.J., Ciofani, K.M. & Miramontes, L.C. 2002. Lines, outlines, and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid. Taxon 51: 475-492.
35. Jojić, V., Blagojević, J. & Vujošević, M. 2011. B chromosomes and cranial variability in yellow-necked field mice (Apodemus flavicollis). J. Mammal. 92: 396-406.
36. Jolliffe, I.T. 2002. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York.
37. Jones, C.S. 1992. Comparative ontogeny of a wild cucurbit and its derived cultivar. Evolution 46: 1827-1847.
38. Kim, M., Canio, W., Kessler, S. & Sinha, N. 2001. Developmental changes due to long-distance movement of a homeobox fusion transcript in tomato. Science 293: 287-289.
39. Kim, M., McCormick, S., Timmermans, M. & Sinha, N. 2003a. The expression domain of PHANTASTICA determines leaflet placement in compound leaves. Nature (Lond.) 424: 438-443.
40. Kim, M., Pham, T., Hamidi, A., McCormick, S., Kuzoff, R.K. & Sinha, N. 2003b. Reduced leaf complexity in tomato wiry mutants suggests a role for PHAN and KNOX genes in generating compound leaves. Development (Camb.) 130: 4405-4415.
41. Klingenberg, C.P. 2003a. Developmental instability as a research tool: using patterns of fluctuating asymmetry to infer the developmental origins of morphological integration. In: Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences (M. Polak, ed.), pp. 427-442. Oxford University Press, New York.
42. Klingenberg, C.P. 2003b. A developmental perspective on developmental instability: theory, models and mechanisms. In: Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences (M. Polak, ed.), pp. 14-34. Oxford University Press, New York.
43. Klingenberg, C.P. 2008. Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39: 115-132.
44. Klingenberg, C.P. 2009. Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a-priori hypotheses. Evol. Dev. 11: 405-421.
45. Klingenberg, C.P. 2010. Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 623-635.
46. Klingenberg, C.P. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11: 353-357.
47. Klingenberg, C.P. & Ekau, W. 1996. A combined morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of an ecomorphological trend: pelagization in Antarctic fishes (Perciformes: Nototheniidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 143-177.
48. Klingenberg, C.P. & Gidaszewski, N.A. 2010. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syst. Biol. 59: 245-261.
49. Klingenberg, C.P. & McIntyre, G.S. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52: 1363-1375.
50. Klingenberg, C.P. & Zimmermann, M. 1992. Static, ontogenetic, and evolutionary allometry: a multivariate comparison in nine species of water striders. Am. Nat. 140: 601-620.
51. Klingenberg, C.P., Barluenga, M. & Meyer, A. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56: 1909-1920.
52. Klingenberg, C.P., Debat, V. & Roff, D.A. 2010. Quantitative genetics of shape in cricket wings: developmental integration in a functional structure. Evolution 64: 2935-2951.
53. Koenig, D. & Sinha, N. 2010. Evolution of leaf shape: a pattern emerges. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 91: 169-183.
54. Koenig, D., Bayer, E., Kang, J., Kuhlemeier, C. & Sinha, N. 2009. Auxin patterns Solanum lycopersicum leaf morphogenesis. Development (Camb.) 136: 2997-3006.
55. Langlade, N.B., Feng, X., Dransfield, T., Copsey, L., Hanna, A.I., Thébaud, C. et al. 2005. Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 10221-10226.
56. Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H. et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics (Oxf.) 23: 2947-2948.
57. Lundberg, M., Töpel, M., Eriksen, B., Nylander, J.A.A. & Eriksson, T. 2009. Allopolyploidy in Fragariinae (Rosaceae): comparing four DNA sequence regions, with comments on classification. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 51: 269-280.
58. Maddison, W.P. 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst. Zool. 40: 304-314.
59. Mardia, K.V., Kent, J.T. & Bibby, J.M. 1979. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, London.
60. Meade, C. & Parnell, J. 2003. Multivariate analysis of leaf shape patterns in Asian species of the Uvaria group (Annonaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 143: 231-242.
61. Miller, J.S. & Venable, D.L. 2003. Floral morphometrics and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Lycium (Solanaceae). Evolution 57: 74-86.
62. Monteiro, L.R. 1999. Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Syst. Biol. 48: 192-199.
63. Preston, K.A. & Ackerly, D.D. 2004. The evolution of allometry in modular organisms. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (M. Pigliucci & K.A. Preston, eds), pp. 80-106. Oxford University Press, New York.
64. Puerta-Piñero, C., Gómez, J.M. & Hódar, J.A. 2008. Shade and herbivory influence fluctuating asymmetry in a Mediterranean oak. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169: 631-635.
65. Rohlf, F.J. & Slice, D.E. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39: 40-59.
66. Royer, D.L., Meyerson, L.A., Robertson, K.M. & Adams, J.M. 2009. Phenotypic plasticity of leaf shape along a temperature gradient in Acer rubrum. PLoS ONE 4: e7653.
67. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 1766-1774.
68. Sidlauskas, B. 2008. Continuous and arrested morphological diversification in sister clades of characiform fishes: a phylomorphospace approach. Evolution 62: 3135-3156.
69. Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P. & Rougemont, J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 57: 758-771.
70. Stuefer, J.F. & Huber, H. 1998. Differential effects of light quantity and spectral light quality on growth, morphology and development of two stoloniferous Potentilla species. Oecologia (Berl.) 117: 1-8.
71. Töpel, M., Lundberg, M., Eriksson, T. & Eriksen, B. 2011. Molecular data and ploidal levels indicate several putative allopolyploidization events in the genus Potentilla (Rosaceae). PLoS Curr. 3: RRN1237.
72. Tsukaya, H. 2005. Leaf shape: genetic controls and environmental factors. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 49: 547-555.
73. Viscosi, V., Fortini, P., Slice, D.E., Loy, A. & Blasi, C. 2009a. Geometric morphometric analyses of leaf variation in four oak species of the subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst. 143: 575-587.
74. Viscosi, V., Lepais, O., Gerber, S. & Fortini, P. 2009b. Leaf morphological analyses in four European oak species (Quercus) and their hybrids: a comparison of traditional and geometric morphometric methods. Plant Biosyst. 143: 564-574.
75. Weight, C., Parnham, D. & Waites, R. 2008. LeafAnalyser: a computational method for rapid and large-scale analyses of leaf shape variation. Plant J. 53: 578-586.
76. Willmore, K.E., Klingenberg, C.P. & Hallgrímsson, B. 2005. The relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and environmental variance in rhesus macaque skulls. Evolution 59: 898-909.
77. Wolf, T. 1908. Monographie der Gattung Potentilla. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.
78. Young, R.L. & Badyaev, A.V. 2006. Evolutionary persistence of phenotypic integration: influence of developmental and functional relationships on complex trait evolution. Evolution 60: 1291-1299.
79. Young, J.P., Dickinson, T.A. & Dengler, N.G. 1995. A morphometric analysis of heterophyllous leaf development in Ranunculus flabellaris. Int. J. Plant Sci. 156: 590-602.
80. Zelditch, M.L., Swiderski, D.L., Sheets, H.D. & Fink, W.L. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier, San Diego.