Leaf morphological analyses in four European oak species (Quercus) and their hybrids: A comparison of traditional and geometric morphometric methods

Plant Biosystems

Volumn 143, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 564-574

  Viscosi, V ^a   Lepais, O ^b,c   Gerber, S ^b,c   Fortini, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MOLISE   (Italy)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

Genetic assignment; Geometric morphometrics; Hybridization; Leaf morphology; Nuclear microsatellites; Quercus; Traditional morphometrics

Indexed keywords

QUERCUS; QUERCUS ALBA; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS PUBESCENS; QUERCUS PYRENAICA; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 65549147580     PISSN: 11263504     EISSN: 17245575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11263500902723129     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson E, Stebbins J. 1954. Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8: 378-388.
2. Arnold ML. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Axelrod DJ. 1983. Biogeography of oaks in the Arcto-Tertiary Province. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 70: 629-657.
4. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Kremer A. 1995. Genetical, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. in a mixed stand of northwest of France. Silvae Genet 44: 1-10.
5. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A. 1996. Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mix stand of European oaks. Evolution 50: 900-908.
6. Baudouin L, Piry S, Cornuet JM. 2004. Analytical Bayesian approach for assigning individuals to populations. J Hered 95: 217-224.
7. Belahbib N, Pemonge MH, Ouassou A, Sbay H, Kremer A, Petit RJ. 2001. Frequent cytoplasmic exchanges between oak species that are not closely related: Quercus suber and Q. ilex in Morocco. Mol Ecol 10: 2003-2012.
8. Boavida LC, Silva JP, Feijò JA. 2001. Sexual reproduction in the cork oak (Quercus suber L). II. Crossing intra- and interspecific barriers. Sexual Plant Reprod 14: 143-152.
9. Borazan A, Babac MT. 2003. Morphometric leaf variation in oaks (Quercus) of Bulu, Turkey. Ann Bot Fennici 40: 233-242.
10. Bordacs S, Burg K. 1997. Genetic differentiation by RAPD- markers of oak species in Hungary. In: Steiner KC, editor. Diversity and adaptation in oak species. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University. pp. 121-131.
11. Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Beaulieu JL, Reille M. 2002. The spread of deciduous Quercus throughout Europe since the last glacial period. For Ecol Manage 156: 27-48.
12. Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossoni P. 2000. Morphological and molecular differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) and Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in Northern and Central Italy. Ann Bot 85: 325-333.
13. Burger WC. 1975. The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24: 45-50.
14. Camus A. 1936-1954. Les Chênes: Monographie du genre Quercus. Paris: P. Lechevalier.
15. Congdon P. 2001. Bayesian statistical modeling. New York: Wiley.
16. Curtu AL, Gailing O, Leinemann L, Finkeldey R. 2007. Genetic variation and differentiation within a natural community of five oak species (Quercus spp.). Plant Biol 9: 116-126.
17. Duminil J, Caron H, Scotti I, Cazal S-O, Petit RJ. 2006. Blind population genetics survey of tropical rainforest trees. Mol Ecol 15: 3505-3513.
18. Dupouey JL, Badeau V. 1993. Morphological variability of oaks (Q. robur L., Q. petraea (Matt) Liebl., Q. pubescens Willd.) in northeastern France: Preliminary results. Ann For Sci 50(1): 35-40.
19. Ellis JR, Burke JM. 2007. EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses. Heredity 99: 125-132.
20. Elsner G. 1993. Preliminary variability of oak stands (Quercus petraea and Quercus robur) in northern Germany. Ann For Sci 50: 228-232.
21. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2003. Inference of population structure II. Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587.
22. Filzmoser P. 2005. Identification of multivariate outliers: A performance study. Aus J Stat 34(2): 127-138.
23. Gellini R, Grossoni P. 1997. Botanica Forestale. Vol. 2. Milano: CEDAM. pp. 92-162.
24. Gonzàles-Rodrìguez A, Arias DM, Oyama K. 2004. Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (Fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks. Amer J Bot 91(3): 499-509.
25. Gschwandtner M, Filzmoser P. 2004. Multivariate outlier detection based on robust methods. Mvoutliers package for R 2.2.0. Available: http://www.statistik.tuwien.ac.at/public/filz/. Accessed Dec 2006 27.
26. Gugerli F, Walser JC, Dounavi K, Holderegger R, Finkeldey R. 2007. Coincidence of small-scale spatial discontinuities in leaf morphology and nuclear microsatellite variation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur in a mixed forest. Ann Bot 99: 713-722.
27. Ietswaart JH, Feij AE. 1989. A multivariate analysis of introgression between Quercus robur and Q. petraea in The Netherlands. Acta Bot Neerl 38(3): 313-325.
28. Iwata H, Ukai Y. 2002. SHAPE ver. 1.2. A computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shape based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J Hered 93(5): 384-385.
29. Kampfer S, Lexer C, Glössl J, Steinkellner H. 1998. Characterization of (GA)(n) microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas 129: 183-186.
30. Kashi Y, King DG. 2006. Simple sequence repeats as advantageous mutators in evolution. Trends Genet 22: 253-259.
31. Kleinschmit JRG, Bacilieri R, Kremer A, Roloff A. 1995. Comparison of morphological traits of pedunculate oak (Q. robur L.) and sessile oak (Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl). Silvae Genet 44: 256-269.
32. Kleinschmit J, Kleinschmit JGR. 2000. Quercus robur - Quercus petraea: A critical review of the species concept. Glasnik Za ßumske Pokuse 37: 441-452.
33. Kremer A, Dupouey LJ, Deans JD, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, Finkeldey R, et al. 2002. Morphological variation in mixed oak stands (Quercus robur and Quercus petraea) is stable western European population. Ann For Sci 59: 777-787.
34. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comput Graph Image Process 18: 236-258.
35. Lepais O, Leger V, Gerber S. 2006. Short note: High through- put microsatellite genotyping in oak species. Silvae Genet 55(4-5): 238-240.
36. Lepais O, Petit RJ, Guichoux E, Lavabre JE, Alberto F, Kremer A, Gerber S. 2009. Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Mol Ecol 18(10): 2228-2242.
37. Manos PS, Dojle JJ, Nixon KC. 1999. Phylogeny, biogeography and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 12: 333-349.
38. Mantel NA. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209-220.
39. Muir G, Fleming CC, Schlötterer C. 2000. Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature 405: 1016.
40. Muir G, Schlötterer C. 2005. Evidence for shared ancestral poly- morphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellite loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Mol Ecol 14: 549-561.
41. Pashley CH, Ellis JR, McCauley DE, Burke JM. 2006. EST databases as a source for molecular markers: Lessons from Helianthus. J Hered 97: 381-388.
42. Petit RJ, Bodénès C, Ducousso A, Roussel G, Kremer A. 2003. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol 161: 151-164.
43. Petit RJ, Brewer S, Bordács S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, et al. 2002. Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonisation routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. For Ecol Manage 156: 49-74.
44. Petit RJ, Latouche-Hallé C, Pemonge MH, Kremer A. 2002. Chloroplast DNA variation of oaks in France and the influence of forest fragmentation on genetic diversity. For Ecol Manage 156: 115-129.
45. Petit RJ, Pineau E, Demesure B, Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Kremer A. 1997. Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 9996-10001.
46. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
47. Rasband, WS. 1997-2007. Image J. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of Health. Available: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/
48. Rohlf FJ, Slice D. 1990. Extension of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmark. Syst Zool 39(1): 40-59.
49. Rushton BS. 1983. An analysis of variation of leaf characters in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. population samples from Northern Ireland. Ir For 40: 52-77.
50. Saintagne C, Bodenes C, Barreneche T, Pot D, Plomion C, Kremer A. 2004. Distribution of genomic regions differentiating oak species assessed by QTL detection. Heredity 92: 20-30.
51. Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, Goicoechea PG, Barreneche T, Bodenes C, et al. 2004. Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Genetics 168: 1615-1626.
52. Spellenberg R. 1995. On the hybrid nature of Quercus basaseachi- censis (Fagaceae, sect. Quercus). SIDA 16(3): 427-434.
53. Steinkellner H, Fluch S, Turetschek E, Lexer C, Streiff R, Kremer A, et al. 1997. Identification and characterization of (GA/CT)n-microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Mol Biol 33: 1093-1096.
54. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Glössl J, Kremer A. 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol Ecol 8: 831-841.
55. Valbuena-Carabaña M, González-Martínez SC, Hardy OJ, Gil L. 2007. Fine-scale spatial genetic structure in mixed oak stands with different levels of hybridization. Mol Ecol 16(6): 1207-1219.
56. Valbuena-Carabaña M, Gonzàlez-Martìnez SC, Sork VL, Collada C, Soto A, Goicoechea PG, et al. 2005. Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 95: 457-465.
57. Viscosi V, Fortini P, Slice DE, Loy A, Blasi C. 2009. Geometric morphometric analyses of leaf variation in four oak species of subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst 143(3): 575-587.
58. Williams JH, Williams JB, Howard DJ. 2001. Reproductive processes in two oak (Quercus) contact zones with different levels of hybridisation. Heredity 87: 680-690.