Quantitative genetics of shape in cricket wings: Developmental integration in a functional structure

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2935-2951

  Klingenberg, Christian Peter ^a   Debat, Vincent ^b   Roff, Derek A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental constraint; Geometric morphometrics; Gryllus firmus; Modularity; Procrustes superimposition; Selection

Indexed keywords

CRICKET; CYTOGENETICS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HERITABILITY; MORPHOMETRY; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SELECTION; WING MORPHOLOGY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FORELIMB; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; GRYLLIDAE; HISTOLOGY; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; GRYLLIDAE; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC; WING;

GRYLLUS FIRMUS;

EID: 77955924596     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01030.x     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Ackermann, R. R., and J. M. Cheverud 2004. Detecting genetic drift versus selection in human evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:17946-17951.
2. Agrawal, A. F., and J. R. Stinchcombe 2009. How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:1183-1191.
3. Albertson, R. C., and T. D. Kocher 2006. Genetic and developmental basis of cichlid trophic diversity. Heredity 97:211-221.
4. Albertson, R. C., J. T. Streelman, T. D. Kocher, and P. C. Yelick 2005. Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: The molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:16287-16292.
5. Alfaro, M. E., D. I. Bolnick, and P. C. Wainwright 2005. Evolutionary consequences of many-to-one mapping of jaw morphology to mechanics in labrid fishes. Am. Nat. 165:E140-E154.
6. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
7. Arthur, W. 1997. The origin of animal body plans: A study in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
8. Arthur, W. 2001. Developmental drive: An important determinant of the direction of phenotypic evolution. Evol. Dev. 3:271-278.
9. Arthur, W. 2002. The interaction between developmental bias and natural selection: From centipede segments to a general hypothesis. Heredity 89:239-246.
10. Badyaev, A. V., and K. R. Foresman 2004. Evolution of morphological integration. I. Functional units channel stress-induced variation in shrew mandibles. Am. Nat. 163:868-879.
11. Bégin, M., and D. A. Roff 2004. From microto macroevolution through quantitative genetic variation: Positive evidence from field crickets. Evolution 58:2287-2304.
12. Bégin, M., D. A. Roff, and V. Debat 2004. The effect of temperature and wing morphology on quantitative genetic variation in the cricket Gryllus firmus, with an appendix examining the statistical properties of the Jackknife-MANOVA method of matrix comparison. J. Evol. Biol. 17:1255-1267.
13. Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield 2002. Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416:844-847.
14. Bennet-Clark, H. C. 1999. Resonators in insect sound production: How insects produce loud pure-tone songs. J. Exp. Biol. 202:3347-3357.
15. Bennet-Clark, H. C. 2003. Wing resonances in the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. J. Exp. Biol. 206:1479-1496.
16. Bennet-Clark, H. C., and W. J. Bailey 2002. Ticking of the clockwork cricket: The role of the escapement mechanism. J. Exp. Biol. 205:613-625.
17. Blair, S. S. 2007. Wing vein patterning in Drosophila and the analysis of intercellular signaling. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23:293-319.
18. Bock, W. J., and G. von Wahlert 1965. Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19:269-299.
19. Bookstein, F. L. 1989. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11:567-585.
20. Breuker, C. J., V. Debat, and C. P. Klingenberg 2006a. Functional evo-devo. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:488-492.
21. Breuker, C. J., J. S. Patterson, and C. P. Klingenberg 2006b. A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape. PLoS ONE 1:e7.
22. Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 110:155-171.
23. Cheverud, J. M. 1988. A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42:958-968.
24. Debat, V., and P. David 2001. Mapping phenotypes: Canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:555-561.
25. Debat, V., P. Alibert, P. David, E. Paradis, and J.-C. Auffray 2000. Independence between developmental stability and canalization in the skull of the house mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267:423-430.
26. Debat, V., C. C. Milton, S. Rutherford, C. P. Klingenberg, and A. A. Hoffmann 2006. Hsp90 and the quantitative variation of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60:2529-2538.
27. Debat, V., R. Cornette, A. B. Korol, E. Nevo, D. Soulet, and J. R. David 2008. Multidimensional analysis of Drosophila wing variation in Evolution Canyon. J. Genet. 87:407-419.
28. Debat, V., A. Debelle, and I. Dworkin 2009. Plasticity, canalization, and developmental stability of the Drosophila wing: Joint effects of mutations and developmental temperature. Evolution 63:2864-2876.
29. Drake, A. G., and C. P. Klingenberg 2010. Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: Disparity and modularity. Am. Nat. 175:289-301.
30. Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
31. Elliott, C. J. H., and U. T. Koch 1985. The clockwork cricket. Naturwissenschaften 72:150-153.
32. Escoufier, Y. 1973. Le traitement des variables vectorielles. Biometrics 29:751-760.
33. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Essex.
34. Fusco, G. 2001. How many processes are responsible for phenotypic evolution? Evol. Dev. 3:279-286.
35. Goodall, C. R. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 53:285-339.
36. Gould, S. J. 1989. A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments on the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution. Evolution 43:516-539.
37. Gould, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Groeneveld, E., M. Kovač, and N. Mielenz 2008. VCE user's guide and reference manual, version 6.0. Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Neustadt, Germany.
39. Hallgrímsson, B., K. Willmore, C. Dorval, and D. M. L. Cooper 2004. Craniofacial variability and modularity in macaques and mice. J. Exp. Zool. 302B:207-225.
40. Hansen, T. F., and D. Houle 2008. Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1201-1219.
41. Hayes, J. F., and W. G. Hill 1981. Modification of estimates of parameters in the construction of genetic selection indices ('bending'). Biometrics 37:483-493.
42. Heming, B. S. 2003. Insect development and evolution. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
43. Hill, W. G., and R. Thompson 1978. Probabilities of non-positive definite between-group or genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 34:429-439.
44. Hine, E., and M. W. Blows 2006. Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 173:1135-1144.
45. Hoekstra, H. E., J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, A. Hoang, C. E. Hill, P. Beerli, and J. G. Kingsolver 2001. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9157-9160.
46. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
47. Jolliffe, I. T. 2002. Principal component analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.
48. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
49. Kirkpatrick, M. 2009. Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica (Dordr.) 136:271-284.
50. Klingenberg, C. P. 2003a. A developmental perspective on developmental instability: Theory, models and mechanisms. Pp. 14-34 in M. Polak, ed. Developmental instability: Causes and consequences. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
51. Klingenberg, C. P. 2003b. Developmental instability as a research tool: Using patterns of fluctuating asymmetry to infer the developmental origins of morphological integration. Pp. 427-442 in M. Polak, ed. Developmental instability: Causes and consequences. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
52. Klingenberg, C. P. 2003c. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape: Heritability and the pitfalls of the univariate approach. Evolution 57:191-195.
53. Klingenberg, C. P. 2005. Developmental constraints, modules and evolvability. Pp. 219-247 in B. Hallgrímsson and B. K. Hall, eds. Variation: A central concept in biology. Elsevier, Burlington, MA.
54. Klingenberg, C. P. 2008a. MorphoJ. Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester. http://www.flywings.org.uk/MorphoJ_page.htm
55. Klingenberg, C. P. 2008b. Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39:115-132.
56. Klingenberg, C. P. 2009. Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: Tools for evaluating a-priori hypotheses. Evol. Dev. 11:405-421.
57. Klingenberg, C. P., and L. J. Leamy 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55:2342-2352.
58. Klingenberg, C. P., and G. S. McIntyre 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: Analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52:1363-1375.
59. Klingenberg, C. P., and L. R. Monteiro 2005. Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: Implications for morphometric applications. Syst. Biol. 54:678-688.
60. Klingenberg, C. P., and S. D. Zaklan 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54:1273-1285.
61. Klingenberg, C. P., A. V. Badyaev, S. M. Sowry, and N. J. Beckwith 2001. Inferring developmental modularity from morphological integration: Analysis of individual variation and asymmetry in bumblebee wings. Am. Nat. 157:11-23.
62. Klingenberg, C. P., M. Barluenga, and A. Meyer 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: Quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56:1909-1920.
63. Klingenberg, C. P., K. Mebus, and J.-C. Auffray 2003. Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: How distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible? Evol. Dev. 5:522-531.
64. Koch, U. T., C. J. H. Elliott, K.-H. Schäffner, and H.-U. Kleindienst 1988. The mechanics of stridulation of the field cricket Gryllus campestris. J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 162:213-223.
65. Kruuk, L. E. B., J. Slate, and A. J. Wilson 2008. New answers for old questions: The evolutionary quantitative genetics of wild animal populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39:525-548.
66. Laffont, R., E. Renvoisé, N. Navarro, P. Alibert, and S. Montuire 2009. Morphological modularity and assessment of developmental processes within the vole dental row (Microtus arvalis, Arvicolinae, Rodentia). Evol. Dev. 11:302-311.
67. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
68. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
69. Laubichler, M. D., and J. Maienschein, eds. 2009. Form and function in developmental evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
70. Leamy, L. 1993. Morphological integration of fluctuating asymmetry in the mouse mandible. Genetica 89:139-153.
71. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
72. Marroig, G., L. T. Shirai, A. Porto, F. B. de Oliveira, and V. De Conto 2009. The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull II: Evolutionary consequences. Evol. Biol. 36:136-148.
73. Martínez-Abadías, N., C. Paschetta, S. de Azevedo, M. Esparza, and R. González-José 2009. Developmental and genetic constraints on neurocranial globularity: Insights from analyses of deformed skulls and quantitative genetics. Evol. Biol. 36:37-56.
74. McGuigan, K., and M. W. Blows 2007. Phenotypic and genetic covariance structure of drosophilid wings. Evolution 61:902-911.
75. Meyer, K. 2007. WOMBAT-A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 8:815-821.
76. Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:1027-1038.
77. Montealegre-Z, F. 2009. Scale effects and constraints for sound production in katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): Correlated evolution between morphology and signal parameters. J. Evol. Biol. 22:355-366.
78. Montealegre-Z, F., J. F. C. Windmill, G. K. Morris, and D. Robert 2009. Mechanical phase shifters for coherent acoustic radiation in the stridulating wings of crickets: The plectrum mechanism. J. Exp. Biol. 212:257-269.
79. Mousseau, T. A., and D. A. Roff 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181-197.
80. Myers, E. M., F. J. Janzen, D. C. Adams, and J. K. Tucker 2006. Quantitative genetics of plastron shape in slider turtles (Trachemys scripta). Evolution 60:563-572.
81. Nocke, H. 1971. Biophysik der Schallerzeugung durch die Vorderflügel der Grillen. Z. Vgl. Physiol. 74:272-314.
82. Perez, S. I., and L. R. Monteiro 2009. Nonrandom factors in modern human morphological diversification: A study of craniofacial variation in southern South American populations. Evolution 63:978-993.
83. Prestwich, K. N., K. M. Lenihan, and D. M. Martin 2000. The control of carrier frequency in cricket calls: A refutation of the subalar-tegminal resonance/auditory feedback model. J. Exp. Biol. 203:585-596.
84. Raff, R. A. 1996. The shape of life: Genes, development and the evolution of animal form. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
85. Riedl, R. 1975. Die Ordnung des Lebendigen: Systembedingungen der Evolution. Parey, Hamburg.
86. Roff, D. A. 1986. The genetic basis of wing dimorphism in the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus and its relevance to the evolution of wing dimorphisms in insects. Heredity 57:221-231.
87. Roff, D. A. 1992. The evolution of life histories: Theory and analysis. Chapman & Hall, New York.
88. Roff, D. A. 1995. The estimation of genetic correlations from phenotypic correlations: A test of Cheverud's conjecture. Heredity 74:481-490.
89. Roff, D. A. 1996. The evolution of genetic correlations: An analysis of patterns. Evolution 50:1392-1403.
90. Roff, D. A. 1997. Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York.
91. Roff, D. A. 2000. The evolution of the G matrix: Selection or drift? Heredity 84:135-142.
92. Roff, D. A. 2007. A centennial celebration for quantitative genetics. Evolution 61:1017-1032.
93. Roff, D. A., and T. A. Mousseau 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: Lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58:103-118.
94. Santos, M., P. Fernández Iriarte, and W. Céspedes 2005. Genetics and geometry of canalization and developmental stability in Drosophila subobscura. BMC Evol. Biol. 5:7.
95. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:1766-1774.
96. Simmons, L. W. 1995. Correlates of male quality in the field cricket, Gryllus campestris L.: Age, size, and symmetry determine pairing success in field populations. Behav. Ecol. 6:376-381.
97. Simmons, L. W., and M. G. Ritchie 1996. Symmetry in the song of crickets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:305-311.
98. Simmons, L. W., and M. Zuk 1992. Variability in call structure and pairing success of male field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus: The effects of age, size and parasite load. Anim. Behav. 44:1145-1152.
99. Stige, L. C., B. David, and P. Alibert 2006. On hidden heterogeneity in directional asymmetry-can systematic bias be avoided? J. Evol. Biol. 19:492-499.
100. Tinghitella, R. M. 2008. Rapid evolutionary change in a sexual signal: Genetic control of the mutation 'flatwing' that renders male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute. Heredity 100:261-267.
101. Veazey, J. N., C. A. R. Kay, T. J. Walker, and W. H. Whitcomb 1976. Seasonal abundance, sex ratio, and mactroptery of field crickets in northern Florida. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69:375-380.
102. Visscher, P. M., W. G. Hill, and N. R. Wray 2008. Heritability in the genomics era-concepts and misconceptions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9:255-266.
103. Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg 1996. Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967-976.
104. Wainwright, P. C. 2009. Innovation and diversity in functional morphology. Pp. 132-152 in M. D. Laubichler and J. Maienschein, eds. Form and function in developmental evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
105. Waitt, D. E., and D. A. Levin 1998. Genetic and phenotypic correlations in plants: A botanical test of Cheverud's conjecture. Heredity 80:310-319.
106. Walsh, B., and M. W. Blows 2009. Abundant genetic variation + strong selection = multivariate genetic constraints: A geometric view of adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:41-59.
107. Weaver, T. D., C. C. Roseman, and C. B. Stringer 2007. Were neanderthal and modern human cranial differences produced by natural selection or genetic drift? J. Hum. Evol. 53:135-145.
108. Webb, K. L., and D. A. Roff 1992. The quantitative genetics of sound production in Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav. 44:823-832.
109. Whyte, L. L. 1965. Internal factors in evolution. Tavistock Publications, London.
110. Willis, J. H., J. A. Coyne, and M. Kirkpatrick 1991. Can one predict the evolution of quantitative characters without genetics? Evolution 45:441-444.
111. Willmore, K. E., C. P. Klingenberg, and B. Hallgrímsson 2005. The relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and environmental variance in rhesus macaque skulls. Evolution 59:898-909.
112. Zelditch, M. L., A. R. Wood, R. M. Bonett, and D. L. Swiderski 2008. Modularity of the rodent mandible: Integrating bones, muscles, and teeth. Evol. Dev. 10:756-768.
113. Zuk, M., J. T. Rotenberry, and R. M. Tinghitella 2006. Silent night: Adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol. Lett. 2:521-524.