The making of a compound leaf: Genetic manipulation of leaf architecture in tomato

Cell

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 735-744

  Hareven, Dana ^a   Gutfinger, Tamar ^a   Parnis, Ania ^a   Eshed, Yuval ^b   Lifschitz, Eliezer ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEOXYURIDINE TRIPHOSPHATE PYROPHOSPHATASE; MESSENGER RNA;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC MANIPULATION; HOMEOBOX; MAIZE; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; TOMATO;

ARABIDOPSIS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0029921002     PISSN: 00928674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81051-X     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moor, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A., and Struhl, K., eds. (1988). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (New York: Wiley).
2. Becraft, P.W., and Freeling, M. (1994). Genetic analysis of Rough sheath1 developmental mutants of maize. Genetics 136, 295-311.
3. Benfey, P.N., and Chua, N.-H. (1990). The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter: combinatorial regulation of transcription in plants. Science 250, 959-966.
4. Bevan, M. (1984). Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucl. Acids Res. 12, 8711-8721.
5. Carroll, S.B. (1995).Homeotic genes and the evolution of anthropods and chordates. Nature 376, 479-485.
6. Caruso, J.L. (1968). Morphogenetic aspects of a leafless mutant in tomato. I. General patterns of development. Am. J. Bot. 55, 1169-1176.
7. Cutter, E.G. (1971). The leaf. In Plant Anatomy: Experiment and Interpretation: Organs (London:Edward Arnold Publishers, Limited), pp. 117-196.
8. Dengler, N.G. (1984). Comparison of leaf development in normal (+/+), entire (e/e), and lanceolate (La/+)plants of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum "Ailsa Craig". Bot. Gaz. 145, 66-77.
9. Dolan, L., and Poethig, R.S. (1991). Genetic analysis of leaf development in cotton. Development Suppl. 113, 39-46.
10. Freeling, M. (1992). A conceptual framework for maize leaf development. Dev. Biol. 53, 44-58.
11. Freeling, M., and Hake, S. (1985). Developmental genetics of mutants that specify Knotted leaves in maize. Genetics 111, 617-634.
12. Hake, S. (1992). Unraveling the knots in plant development. Trends Genet. 8, 109-114.
13. Hake, S., Volbrecht, E., and Freeling, M. (1989). Cloning Knotted, the dominant morphological mutant in maize using Ds2 as a transposon tag. EMBO J. 8, 15-22.
14. Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Pnueli, L., Bauch, L., Cohen, O., and Lifschitz, E. (1994). The floral system of tomato. Euphytica 79, 235-243.
15. Helm, J. (1951). Vergleichende Betrachtungen über die Entwicklung der Infloreszenz bei Lycopersicon esculentum Mill und bei einer Röntgemutante. Zuchter 21, 89-95.
16. Horsch, R.B., Fry, J.E., Hoffmann, N.L., Eichholtz, D., Rogers, S.G., and Fraley, R.T. (1985). A simple and general method for transfering genes into plants. Science 227, 1229-1231.
17. Jackson, D. (1991). In situ hybridization in plants. In Molecular Plant Pathology: A Practical Approach, D.J. Bowles, S.J. Gurr, and M. McPherson, eds. (Oxford: IRL Press).
18. Jackson, D., Veit, B., and Hake, S. (1994). Expression of maize Knotted1-related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 120, 405-413.
19. Kaplan, D. (1973). Comparative developmental analysis of the heteroblastic leaf series of axillary shoots of Acorus calamus L. (Araceae). Cellule 69, 251-290.
20. Kaplan, D. (1983). The development of palm leaves. Sci. Am. 249, 98-105.
21. Kerstetter, R., Volbrecht, E., Lowe, B., Veit, B., Yamaguchi, J., and Hake, S. (1994). Sequence analysis and expression patterns divide the maize Knotted1-like homeobox genes into two classes. Plant Cell 6, 1877-1887.
22. Lincoln, C., Long, J., Yamaguchi, J., Serlkawa, K., and Hake, S. (1994). A Knotted-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 6, 1859-1876.
23. Ma, H., McMullen, M.D., and Finer, J.J. (1994). Identification of a homeobox-containing gene with enhanced expression during soybean (Glycine max L.) somatic embryo development. Plant Mol. Biol. 24, 465-473.
24. Marks, G.A. (1987). A suit of mutants that modify pattern formation in pea leaves. Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 5, 311-335.
25. Mathan, D.S., and Jenkins, J.A. (1962). A morphogenetic study of leaf shape of lanceolate, a leaf-shape mutant in the tomato. Am. J. Bot. 49, 504-514.
26. Matsuoka, M., Ichikawa, H., Saito, A., Tada, Y., Fujimura, T., and Kano-Murakami, Y. (1993). Expression of a rice homeobox gene causes altered morphology of transgenic plants. Plant Cell 5, 1039-1048.
27. McCormick, S. (1991). Transformation of tomato with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Tissue Culture Manual B6, 1-9.
28. Pnueli, L., Hareven, D., Broday, L., Hurwitz, C., and Lifschitz, E. (1994). The TM5 MADS box gene mediates organ differentiation in the three inner whorls of tomato flowers. Plant Cell 6, 175-186.
29. Poethig, R.S. (1987). Clonal analysis of cell lineage patterns in plant development. Am. J. Bot. 74, 581-594.
30. Poethig, S., and Sussex, I.M. (1985). The cellular parameters of leaf development in tobacco: a clonal analysis. Planta 165, 170-184.
31. Pri-Hadash, A., Hareven, D., and Lifschitz, E. (1992). A meristem-related gene from tomato encodes a dUTPase: Analysis of expression in vegetative and floral meristems. Plant Cell 4, 149-159.
32. Sinha, N., and Hake, S. (1994). The Knotted1 leaf blade is a mosaic of blade, sheath and auricle identities. Dev. Genet. 15, 401-414.
33. Sinha, N., Hake, S., and Freeling, M. (1993a). Genetic and molecular analysis of leaf development. Curr. Topics Dev. Biol. 28, 47-80.
34. Sinha, N., Williams, R., and Hake, S. (1993b). Overexpression of the maize homeobox gene, Knotted1, causes a switch from determinate to indeterminate cell fates. Genes Dev. 7, 787-795.
35. Smith, L.G., and Hake, S. (1992). The initiation and determination of leaves. Plant Cell 4, 1017-1027.
36. Smith, L.G., Greene, B., Veit, B., and Hake, S. (1992). A dominant mutation in the maize homeobox gene, Knotted-1, causes its ectopic expression in leaf cells with altered fates. Development 116, 21-30.
37. Steeves, T.A., and Sussex, I.M. (1989). Patterns in Plant Development (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).
38. Stettler, R.F. (1964). Dosage effects of the lanceolate gene in tomato. Am. J. Bot. 51, 253-264.
39. Stevens, A.M.,and Rick, C.M. (1986). Genetics and breeding. In The Tomato Crop, J.G. Atherton and J. Rudick, eds. New York: Chapman and Hall).
40. Sussex, I.M. (1989). Developmental programming of the shoot meristem. Cell 56, 225-229.
41. Volbrecht, E., Veit, B., Sinha, N., and Hake, S. (1991). The developmental gene Knotted-1 is a member of a maize homeobox gene family. Nature 350, 241-243.