Justices and legal clarity: Analyzing the complexity of U.S. Supreme Court opinions

Law and Society Review

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1027-1061

  Owens, Ryan J ^a   Wedeking, Justin P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 83255170558     PISSN: 00239216     EISSN: 15405893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00464.x     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Anders, David B. (1992) "Justices Harlan and Black Revisited: The Emerging Dispute between Justice O'Connor and Justice Scalia over Unenumerated Fundamental Rights," 61 Fordham Law Rev. 895-933.
2. Axelrod, Robert M. (1970) Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics. Chicago, IL: Markham Publishing Company.
3. Baird, Vanessa A. (2004) "The Effect of Politically Salient Decisions on the U.S. Supreme Court's Agenda," 66 Journal of Politics 755-772.
4. Bergara, Mario, Barak Richman, & Pablo T. Spiller (2003) "Modeling Supreme Court Decision Making: The Congressional Constraint," 28 Legislative Studies Q. 247-280.
5. Bickel, Alexander, M. (1962) The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven, CT: Bobbs-Merrill.
6. Brenner, Saul (1983) "Another Look at Freshman Indecisiveness on the United States Supreme Court," 16 Polity 320-328.
7. Collins, Paul M., Jr. (2008) Friends of the Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
8. Corley, Pamela C. (2008) "The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Influence of Parties' Briefs," 61 Political Research Q. 468-478.
9. Cray, Ed, ed. (1997) Chief Justice: A Biography of Earl Warren. New York: Simon & Schuster.
10. Dickey, Walter, David Schultz, & James L. Fullin (1989) "The Importance of Clarity in the Law of Homicide: The Wisconsin Revision," 1989 Wisconsin Law Rev. 1323-1394.
11. Dolbeare, Kenneth, & Phillip E. Hammond (1971) The School Prayer Decisions from Court Policy to Local Practice. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
12. Douglas, William O. (1960) America Challenged. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
13. Dworkin, Ronald (1986) Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
14. Epstein, Lee, Barry Friedman, & Nancy Staudt (2008) "On the Capacity of the Roberts Court to Generate Consequential Precedent," 86 North Carolina Law Rev. 1299-1332.
15. Epstein, Lee & Jack Knight (1998) The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
16. Epstein, Lee & Jeffrey A. Segal (2000) "Measuring Issue Salience," 44 American J. of Political Science 66-83.
17. Evans, Michael, etal. (2006) "Recounting the Courts? Applying Automated Content Analysis to Enhance Empirical Legal Research," Paper presented at the 2006 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, August 28th 2006 in Austin, Texas.
18. Faigman, David L. (1992) "Constitutional Adventures in Wonderland: Exploring the Debate Between Rules and Standards through the Looking Glass of the First Amendment," 44 Hastings Law J. 829.
19. Friedman, Barry (2002) "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Party Two: Reconstruction's Political Court," 91 Georgetown Law J. 1-65.
20. Fuller, Lon (1964) The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
21. Gates, John B., & Glenn A. Phelps (1996) "Intentionalism in Constitutional Opinions," 48 Political Research Q. 245-261.
22. Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, & Vanessa A. Baird (1998) "On the Legitimacy of National High Courts," 92 American Political Science Rev. 343-358.
23. Gruenfeld, Deborah H. (1995) "Status, Ideology, and Integrative Complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the Politics of Political Decision Making," 68 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 5-20.
24. Gruenfeld, Deborah H. & Jared Preston (2000) "Upending the Status Quo: Cognitive Complexity in U.S. Supreme Court Justices Who Overturn Legal Precedent," 26 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1013-1022.
25. Hagle, Timothy M. (1993) "'Freshman Effects' for Supreme Court Justices," 37 American J. of Political Science 1142-1157.
26. Hansford, Thomas G., & James F. Spriggs, II (2006) The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
27. Hart, Herbert L. A. (1963) Law, Liberty, and Morality. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
28. Harvey, Anna, & Barry Friedman (2006) "Pulling Punches: Congressional Constraint on the Supreme Court's Constitutional Rulings, 1987-2000," 31 Legislative Studies Q. 533-562.
29. Heck, Edward V., & Melinda Gann Hall (1981) "Bloc Voting and the Freshman Justice Revisited," 43 J. of Politics 852-860.
30. Howard, J. Woodford, Jr. (1968) "On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice," 62 American Political Science Rev. 43-56.
31. Hurwitz, Mark S., & Oseph V. Stefko (2004) "Acclimation and Attitudes: "Newcomer" Justices and Precedent Conformance on the Supreme Court," 57 Political Research Q. 121-129.
32. Kaplow, Louis (1992) "Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis," 42 Duke Law J. 557-629.
33. Knight, Jack, & Lee Epstein (1996) "The Norm of Stare Decisis," 40 American Journal of Political Science 1018-1035.
34. Korobkin, Russell B. (2000) "Behavioral Analysis and Legal Form: Rules vs. Standards Revisited," 79 Oregon Law Rev. 23.
35. Law, David S., & David Zaring (2010) "Law Versus Ideology: The Supreme Court and the Use of Legislative History," 51 William and Mary Law Rev. 1-62.
36. Lewis, David E. (2003) Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946-1997. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
37. Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs, II, & Paul J. Wahlbeck (2000) Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
38. Martin, Andrew D., & Kevin M. Quinn (2002) "Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999," 10 Political Analysis 134-153.
39. Moe, Terry M. (1989) "The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure," in Chubb, John E., & Paul E. Peterson, eds., Can the Government Govern? Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
40. Murphy, Walter F. (1964) Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
41. Newman, Matthew L, etal. (2003) "Lying Words: Predictin Deception From Linguistic Styles," 29 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 665-675.
42. Oakes, James L. (1992) "Keynote Address-Conference on Compelling Government Interests: Introduction by Hon. James L. Oakes," 55 Albany Law Rev. 535-538.
43. Overton, Spencer (2002) "Rules, Standards, and Bush v. Gore: Form and the Law of Democracy," 37 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Rev. 65-102.
44. Owens, Ryan (2010) "The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting," 54 American Journal of Political Science 412-427.
45. Pennebaker, James W., & Laura A. King (1999) "Linguistic Styles: Language Use as an Individual Difference," 77 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1296-1312.
46. Pennebaker, James W. & Thomas C. Lay (2002) "Linguistic Styles: Language Use and Personality During Crises: Analyses of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's Press Conferences," 36 J. of Research in Personality 271-282.
47. Pennebaker, James W., Tracy J. Mayne, & Martha E. Francis (1997) "Linguistic Predictors of Adaptive Bereavement," 72 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 863-871.
48. Pennebaker, James W., Richard B. Slachter, & Cindy K. Chung (2005) "Linguistic Markers of Psychological State through Media Interviews: John Kerry and John Edwards in 2004, Al Gore in 2000," 5(1) Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 197-204.
49. Phelps, Glenn A., & John B. Gates (1991) "The Myth of Jurisprudence: Interpretative Theory in the Constitutional Opinions of Justice Rehnquist and Brennan," 31 Santa Clara Law Rev. 567-596.
50. Posner, Eric A. (1997) "Standards, Rules, and Social Norms," 21 Harvard J. of Law and Public Policy 101.
51. Priest, George L., & Benjamin Klein (1984) "The Selection of Disputes for Litigation," 13 J. of Legal Studies 1-55.
52. Radin, Margaret Jane (1989) "Reconsidering the Rule of Law," 69 Boston University Law Rev. 781.
53. Rehnquist, William H. (1987) The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is. New York: William Morrow and Company.
54. Rehnquist, William H. (1992) "Remarks on the Process of Judging," 49 Washington and Lee Law Rev. of Economic Studies 263-270.
55. Rohde, David W. (1972) "Policy Goals, Strategic, Choice and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U. S. Supreme Court," 16 Midwest J. of Political Science 652-682.
56. Rosen, Jeffrey (2001) "A Majority of One," The New York Times Section 6: Column 1: June 3, 32.
57. Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
58. Rubin, Edward L. (2008) "Question Regarding D.C. v. Heller: As a Justice, Antonin Scalia Is (A) Great, (B) Acceptable, (C) Injudicious," 54 The Wayne Law Rev. 1105-1130.
59. Sala, Brian R., & James F. Spriggs, II (2004) "Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers," 57 Political Research Q. 197-208.
60. Scalia, Antonin S. (1989) "The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules," 56 University of Chicago Law Rev. 1175-1181.
61. Scalia, Antonin S. (1998) "Dissents," 13 OAH Magazine of History 18-23.
62. Schauer, Frederick (1991) "Rules and the Rule of Law," 14 Harvard J. of Law and Public Policy 645.
63. Schwartz, Bernard (1983) Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court, a Judicial Biography. New York: New York Univ. Press.
64. Segal, Jeffrey A. (1997) "Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts," 91 American Political Science Rev. 28-44.
65. Segal, Jeffrey A. & Harold J. Spaeth (2002) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
66. Smith, Steven S. (1989) Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings.
67. Sorauf, Frank J. (1959) "Zorach v. Clauson: The Impact of a Supreme Court Decision," 53 American Political Science Rev. 777-791.
68. Spaeth, Harold J. (2008a) "Expanded Burger Court Judicial Database,": Michigan State University.
69. Spaeth, Harold J. (2008b) "The Original United States Supreme Court Judicial Database 1953-2007 Terms," Downloaded from JURI, University of South Carolina in 2008.
70. Spiller, Pablo T., & Rafael Gely (1992) "Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949-1988," 23 RAND Journal of Economics 463-492.
71. Spriggs, James F., II (1996) "The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies: A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact," 40 American J. of Political Science 1122-1151.
72. Staton, Jeffrey K., & Georg Vanberg (2008) "The Value of Vagueness, Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions," 52 American J. of Political Science 504-519.
73. Staudt, Nancy, Barry Friedman, & Lee Epstein (2008) "On the Role of Ideological Homogeneity in Generating Consequential Constitutional Decisions," 10 University of Pennsylvania J. of Constitutional Law 361-386.
74. Stirman, Shannon W., & James W. Pennebaker (2001) "Word Use in the Poetry of Suicidal and Non-Suicidal Poets," 63 Psychosomatic Medicine 517-522.
75. Suedfeld, Peter, & A. Dennis Rank (1976) "Revolutionary Leaders: Long-Term Success as a Function of Changes in Conceptual Complexity," 34 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 169-178.
76. Sulam, Ian (2010) "Editor In Chief: Opinion Authorship and Clerk Inuence on the Supreme Court," Unpublished paper presented at the 2010 Midwestern Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, Ill.
77. Sullivan, Kathleen M. (1992) "The Justices of Rules And Standards," 106 Harvard Law Rev. 22-123.
78. Sunstein, Cass R. (1996) "Forward: Leaving Things Undecided," 110 Harvard Law Rev. 4-101.
79. Tausczik, Yla R., & James W. Pennebaker (2010) "The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods," 29 J. of Language and Social Psychology 24-54.
80. Tetlock, Philip E. (1981a) "Personality and Isolationism: Content Analysis of Senatorial Speeches," 41 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 737-743.
81. Tetlock, Philip E. (1981b) "Pre- to Postelection Shifts in Presidential Rhetoric: Impression Management or Cognitive Adjustment?," 41 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 207-212.
82. Tetlock, Philip E. (1984) "Cognitive Style and Political Belief Systems in the British House of Commons," 46 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 365-375.
83. Tetlock, Philip E., Jane Bernzweig, & Jack L. Gallant (1985) "Supreme Court Decision Making: Cognitive Style as a Predictor of Ideological Consistency of Voting," 48 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 1227-1239.
84. Thayer, James B. (1901) John Marshall. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
85. Wahlbeck, Paul J., James F. Spriggs, II, & Lee Sigelman (2002) "Ghostwriters on the Court? A Stylistic Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Draft Opinions," 30 American Politics Research 166-192.
86. Wald, Patricia M. (1995) "The Rhetoric and Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings," 62 University of Chicago Law Rev. 1371-1419.
87. Ward, Artemus, & David L. Weiden (2006) Sorcerers' Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court. New York: New York Univ. Press.
88. Woodward, Bob, & Scott Armstrong (1979) The Brethern: Inside the Supreme Court. New York: Simon & Schuster.
89. Wright, Ronald F., & Mark A. Hall (2008) "Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions," 96 California Law Rev. 63-122.
90. Zullow, Harold M., etal. (1988) "Pessimistic Explanatory Style in the Historical Record," 43 American Psychologist 673-682.