Designing tests of the Supreme Court and the separation of powers

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 197-208

  Sala, Brian R ^a   Spriggs II, James F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543093796     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290405700202     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alker, Hayward R., Jr. 1969. ''Statistics and Politics: The Need for Causal Data Analysis." In Seymour Martin Lipset, ed., Politics and the Social Sciences, pp. 244-313. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bailey, Michael. 2002. "Comparing Presidents, Senators, and Justices, 1946-2002."Typescript.
3. Bailey, Michael, and Kelly Chang. 2001. "Comparing Presidents and Senators and Justices: Inter-Institutional Preference Estimation."Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (October): 477-506.
4. Baum, Lawrence. 1977. "Policy Goals in Judicial Gatekeeping: A Proximity Model of Discretionary Jurisdiction." American Journal of Political Science 21: 13-35.
5. Bergara, Mario, Barak Richman, and Pablo T. Spiller, n.d. ''Modeling Supreme Court Preferences in a Strategic Context." Legislative Studies Quarterly: forthcoming.
6. Caldeira, Gregory, and Christopher J. W Zorn. 1998. "Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court." American journal of Political Science 42 (July): 874-902.
7. Dahl, Robert A. 1957. "Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as National Policy-Maker." Journal of Public Law 6 (Fall): 279-95.
8. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Timothy Johson, 1996. "The Claim of Issue Creation on the U.S. Supreme Court." American Political Science Review 90 (December): 845-52.
9. Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Andrew D. Martin. 2001. "The Supreme Court as a Strategic National Policy Maker." Emory Law Journal 50 (Spring): 583-611.
10. Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991. "Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions." Yale University Law Journal 101: 331-455.
11. Ferejohn, John A., and Charles Shipan. 1990. "Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 1-20.
12. Gely, Rafael, and Pablo T. Spiller. 1990. "A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Casts." Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 6: 263-300.
13. Gibson, James. 1997. United States Supreme Court Judicial Data Base - Phase II. Texas, University of Houston.
14. Hansford, Thomas G., and David F. Damore. 2000. "Congressional Preferences, Perceptions of Threat, and Supreme Court Decision Making." American Politics Quarterly 28 (October): 490-510.
15. Hausegger, Lori, and Lawrence Baum. 1999. "Inviting Congressional Action: A Study of Supreme Court Motivations in Statutory Interpretation." American Journal of Political Science 43 (1): 162-85
16. Ignagni, Joseph, and James Meernik. 1994. "Explaining Congressional Attempts to Reverse Supreme Court Decisions." Political Research Quarterly 47: 353-71.
17. Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996a. "On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy." Law & Society Review 30 (1): 87-120.
18. Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996b. "The Norm of Stare Decisis." American Journal of Political Science 40: 1018-35.
19. Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs, II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Marks, Brian A. 1989. A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City v. Bell (1984). Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Washington University in St. Louis.
21. Martin, Andrew D. 2001. "Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers." American Political Science Review 95 (June): 361-78.
22. Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2002. "Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999." Political Analysis 10 (Spring):134-53.
23. Moraski, Byron, and Charles R. Shipan. 1999. "The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices." American Journal of Political Science 43 (October):106995.
24. Poole, Keith T. 1998. "Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales." American Journal of Political Science 42 (July): 954-93.
25. Poole, Keith T, and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A PoliticalEconomic History of Roll Call Voting. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
26. Rehnquist, William H. 1987. The Supreme Court: How it Was How it Is. New York: William Morrow.
27. Rogers, James R. 2001. "Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction." American Journal of Political Science 45 (January): 84-99.
28. Rohde, David W., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W H. Freeman.
29. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1990. "Supreme Court Support for the Solicitor General: The Effect of Presidential Appointments." Western Political Quarterly 43 (March): 137-52.
30. _. 1997. "Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts." American Political Science Review 91: 28-44.
31. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert Cover. 1989. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices," American Political Science Review 83 (June): 557-65.
32. Segal, Jeffrey, A., and Harold J. Spaeth, 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Segal, Jeffrey A., Lee Epstein, Charles M. Cameron, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1995. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited." Journal of Politics 57 (August): 812-23.
34. Songer, Donald R., and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. "Interest Group Success in the Courts: Amicus Participation in the Supreme Court." Political Research Quarterly 46 (June): 339-54.
35. Spaeth, Harold J. 2001. United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1953-2000 Terms. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
36. Spiller, Pablo T., and Emerson H. Tiller. 1996. "Invitations to Override: Congressional Reversals of Supreme Court Decisions." International Review of Law and Economics 16: 503-21.
37. Spiller, Pablo T., and Rafael Gely. 1992. Congressional Control or Judicial Independence. RAND Journal of Economics 23 (Winter): 463-92.
38. Spriggs, James F., II, and Thomas G. Hansford, 2001. "Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent." Journal of Politics 63 (August): 1091-1111.
39. Vanberg, Georg. 2000. "Legislative-Judicial Relations: A GameTheoretic Approach to Constitutional Review." American Journal of Political Science 45 (April): 346-61.
40. Walker, Thomas G., Lee Epstein, and William J. Dixon. 1988. "On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court." Journal of Politics 50 (May): 361-89.