Modeling Supreme court strategic decision making: The congressional constraint

Legislative Studies Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 247-280

  Bergara, Mario ^a,c,d   Richman, Barak ^b,e,f   Spiller, Pablot ^b,e,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF URUGUAY   (Uruguay)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c U Reguladora de Serv de Comun   (Uruguay)

^d Central Bank of Uruguay   (Uruguay)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f Federal Courthouse Room 311 ^*  (United States)

^g FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142710985     PISSN: 03629805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3162/036298003x200881     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Akaike, Hirotsugu. 1974. "A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification." IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control AC-9, 716-23.
2. Chi, P., and C.T. Russell. 1999. Statistical Methods for Data Analysis in Space Physics. Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire, England.
3. Dahl, Robert A. 1957. "Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker." Journal of Public Law 6:179-295.
4. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1995. "Positive Approaches to Supreme Court Decision Making." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
5. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington: CQ Press.
6. Epstein, Lee, and Carol Mershon. 1996. "Measuring Political Preferences." American Journal of Political Science 40:261-94.
7. Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G. Walker. 1995. "The Role of the Supreme Court on American Society: Playing the Reconstruction Game." In Contemplating Courts, ed. Lee Epstein. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
8. Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991a. "Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions." Yale Law Journal 101:825-41.
9. Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991b. "Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/ President Civil Rights Game." California Law Review 79:613-84.
10. Funston, Richard. 1975. "The Supreme Court and Critical Elections." American Political Science Review 69:795-811.
11. Gely, Rafael, and Pablo T. Spiller. 1990. "A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6:263-300.
12. Groseclose, Timothy, Steven D. Levitt, and James M. Snyder, Jr. 1999. "Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress." American Political Science Review 93:33-50.
13. Harvey, Andrew C. 1981. Time Series Models. New York: Wiley.
14. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Marks, Brian A. 1988. "A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: 'Grove City College v. Bell.'" Working Paper in Political Science P-88-7, Hoover Institution.
16. Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Pritchett, C. Herman. 1941. "Divisions of Opinion among Justices of the Supreme Court, 1939-1941." American Political Science Review 35:890-98.
18. Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. "The Roosevelt Court: Votes and Values." American Political Science Review 42:53-67.
19. Schubert, Glendon A. 1965. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
20. Schwartz, Edward P. 1992. "Policy, Precedent, and Power: A Positive Theory of Supreme Court Decision-Making." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8:219-52.
21. Schwartz, Edward P., Pablo T. Spiller, and S. Urbiztondo. 1994. "A Positive Theory of Legislative Intent." Law and Contemporary Problems 57:51-74.
22. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. "Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts." American Political Science Review 91:28-44.
23. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices." American Political Science Review 83:557-65.
24. Segal, Jeffrey A., Lee Epstein, Charles M. Cameron, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1995. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited." Journal of Politics 57:812-23.
25. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Segal, Jeffrey A., and C-L. Wang. 2001. "Inducing Apparently Strategic Behavior in Models of Bounded Discretion: The Case of Regime-Change Switching Regressions." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
27. Snyder, James M., Jr. 1992. "Committee Power, Structure-Induced Equilibria, and Roll Call Votes." American Journal of Political Science 36:1-30.
28. Spiller, Pablo T. 1992. "Agency Discretion under Judicial Review." Mathematical and Computer Modeling 16:185-200.
29. Spiller, Pablo T. 1996. "A Positive Political Theory of Regulatory Instruments - Contracts, Administrative Law or Regulatory Specificity." Southern California Law Review 69:477-515.
30. Spiller, Pablo T., and Rafael Gely. 1992. "Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949-1988." Rand Journal of Economics 23:463-92.
31. Spiller, Pablo T., and Matthew L. Spitzer. 1992. "Judicial Choice of Legal Doctrines." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8:8-46.
32. Spiller, Pablo T., and Emerson H. Tiller. 1996. "Invitations to Override: Congressional Reversals of Supreme Court Decisions." International Review of Law and Economics 16:503-21.