The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court

The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 1-155

  Hansford, Thomas G ^a   Spriggs, James F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85195986141     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (230)

1. Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners. 1947. 332 U.S. 495.
2. Aguilar v. Texas. 1964. 378 U.S. 108.
3. Aldisert, Rugero J. 1990. “Precedent: What It Is and What It Isn’t; When Do We Kiss It and When Do We Kill It?” Pepperdine Law Review 17(April):605–36.
4. Allen, Carleton Kemp. 1964. Law in the Making. 7th ed. New York: Clarendon Press.
5. Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc. 1968. 391 U.S. 308.
6. American Insurance Association v. Garamendi. 2003. 156 L.Ed. 2d 376.
7. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Scheiner. 1987. 483 U.S. 266.
8. Anders v. California. 1967. 386 U.S. 738.
9. AT&T Technologies v. Communications Workers of America. 1986. 475 U.S. 643.
10. Banks, Christopher P. 1992. “The Supreme Court and Precedent: An Analysis of Natural Courts and Reversal Trends.” Judicature 75(February-March): 262–68.
11. Baum, Lawrence. 1988. “Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82(September):905–12.
12. Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michi­gan Press.
13. Baum, Lawrence. 2001. The Supreme Court. 7th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quar­terly Press.
14. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. “Taking Time Se­riously: Time Series-Cross Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Vari­able.” American Journal of Political Science 42(October):1260–88.
15. Benesh, Sara C. 2002. The U.S. Courts of Appeals and the Law of Confessions: Perspectives on the Hierarchy of Justice. New York: LFP Scholarly Publishing.
16. Benesh, Sara, and Malia Reddick. 2002. “Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent.” Journal of Politics 64(May): 534–50.
17. Bhala, Raj. 1999. “The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adju­dication.” Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 9(Fall): 1–151.
18. Bond, Jon R., and Charles A. Johnson. 1982. “Implementing a Permissive Pol­icy: Hospital Abortion Services after Roe v. Wade.” American Journal of Po­litical Science 26(February): 1–24.
19. Boucher, Robert L., and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1995. “Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court.” Journal of Politics 57(August): 824–37.
20. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones. 2004. Event History Model­ing: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Brenner, Saul. 1982. “Strategic Choice and Opinion Assignment on the U.S. Supreme Court: A Reexamination.” Western Political Quarterly 35(June): 204–11.
22. Brenner, Saul, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1988. “Ideological Position as a Variable in the Authoring of Dissenting Opinions on the Warren and Burger Courts.” American Politics Quarterly 16(July): 317–28.
23. Brenner, Saul, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1995. Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1946–1992. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Brenner, Saul, and Marc Stier. 1996. “Retesting Segal and Spaeth’s Stare Decisis Model.” American Journal of Political Science 40(November): 1036–48.
25. Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan, and Matthew Stephenson. 2002. “Informative Prece­dent and Intrajudicial Communication.” American Political Science Review 96(December): 755–66.
26. Bush v. Gore. 2000. 531 U.S. 98.
27. Bush v. Vera. 1996. 517. U.S. 952.
28. Caldeira, Gregory A. 1985. “The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts.” American Political Science Review 79(March): 178–93.
29. Caldeira, Gregory A. 1986. “Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confi­dence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 80(December): 1209–26.
30. Caldeira, Gregory A. 1988. “Legal Precedent: Structures of Communication between State Supreme Courts.” Social Networks 10(March): 29–55.
31. Caldeira, Gregory A., John R. Wright, and Christoper J. W. Zorn. 1999. “Strate­gic Voting and Gatekeeping in the Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Econom­ics, & Organization 15(October): 549–72.
32. Cameron, Charles M., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Donald Songer. 2000. “Strategic Au­diting in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Decisions.” American Political Science Review 94(March): 101–16.
33. Cameron, A. Colin, and Pravin K. Trivedi. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Canon, Bradley C. 1973. “Reactions of State Supreme Courts to a U.S. Supreme Court Civil Liberties Decision.” Law & Society Review 8(Fall): 109–34.
35. Canon, Bradley C. 1977. “Testing the Effectiveness of Civil Liberties Policies at the State and Federal Levels: The Case of the Exclusionary Rule.” American Politics Quarterly 5(January):57–82.
36. Canon, Bradley C., and Charles A. Johnson. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implemen­tation and Impact. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
37. Cardozo, Benjamin. [1921] 1964. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38. Carmines, Edward G., and Richard A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and Validity As­sessment. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
39. Carter, Leif. 1988. Reason in Law. 4th ed. New York: Harper Collins.
40. Central Hardware Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. 1972. 407 U.S. 539.
41. Circuit City Stores v. Adams. 2001. 532 U.S. 105.
42. Clayton, Cornell W., and Howard Gillman, eds. 1999. Supreme Court Decision­ Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Cohen, Jacob. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educa­tion and Psychological Measurement 20(1): 37–46.
44. Comparato, Scott A., and Scott D. McClurg. 2003. “Ambiguity in the Transmis­sion of Precedent: A Team Theoretic Approach to the Relationship between the Supreme Court and State Supreme Courts.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 28–31.
45. Cooter, Robert, Stephen Marks, and Robert Mnookin. 1982. “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 11(June): 225–51.
46. Danelski, David J. 1986. “Causes and Consequences of Conflict and Its Resolu­tion in Supreme Court.” In Judicial Conflict and Consensus: Behavioral Stud­ies of American Appellate Courts, ed. Charles M. Lamb and Sheldon Goldman. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
47. DeJonge v. Oregon. 1937. 229 U.S. 353.
48. Department of Taxation and Finance of New York v. Milhelm Attea and Bros. 1994. 512 U.S. 61.
49. Dometrius, Nelson C., and Lee Sigelman. 1988. “Modeling the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions.” Journal of Politics 50(February):131–49.
50. Douglas, William O. [1949] 1979. “Stare Decisis.” In Courts, Judges, and Politics: An Introduction to the Judicial Process, ed. Walter F. Murphy and C. Herman Pritchett. New York: Random House.
51. Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Epstein, Lee, and Gary King. 2002. “The Rules of Inference.” University of Chicago Law Review 69(Winter): 1–133.
53. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
54. Epstein, Lee, and Joseph F. Kobylka. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
55. Epstein, Lee, and Carol Mershon. 1996. “Measuring Political Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 40(February): 261–94.
56. Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44(January): 66–85.
57. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Timothy Johnson. 1996. “The Claim of Issue Creation on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 90(December): 845–52.
58. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Harold J. Spaeth. 2001. “The Norm of Con­sensus on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 45(April): 362–77.
59. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, Harold J. Spaeth, and Thomas G. Walker. 1996. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions and Developments. Wash­ington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
60. Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpre­tation Decisions.” Yale Law Journal 101 (November): 331–455.
61. Estelle v. McGuire. 1991. 502 U.S. 62.
62. Fenno, Richard F. 1986. “Observation, Context, and Sequence in the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 80(March): 3–15.
63. Flemming, Roy B., John Bohte, and B. Dan Wood. 1997. “One Voice among Many: The Supreme Court’s Influence on Attentiveness to Issues in the United States, 1947–92.” American Journal of Political Science 41(October): 1224–50.
64. Freed, Todd E. 1996. “Is Stare Decisis Still the Lighthouse Beacon of Supreme Court Jurisprudence? A Critical Analysis.” Ohio State Law Journal 57(5): 1767–97.
65. Friedman, Lawrence M. 1985. A History of American Law. 2nd ed. New York: Simon and Schuster.
66. Friedman, Lawrence M., Robert A. Kagan, Bliss Cartwright, and Stanton Wheeler. 1981. “State Supreme Courts: A Century of Style and Citation.” Stanford Law Review 33(May): 773–818.
67. Friedrich, Robert J. 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Re­gression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science 26(November): 797–833.
68. Gates, John B., and Glenn A. Phelps. 1996. “Intentionalism in Constitutional Opinions.” Political Research Quarterly 48(June): 245–61.
69. Gely, Rafael, and Pablo T. Spiller. 1992. “The Political Economy of Supreme Court Constitutional Decisions: The Case of Roosevelt’s Court-Packing Plan.” International Review of Law and Economics 12(March): 45–67.
70. George, Tracey E., and Lee Epstein. 1992. “On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 86(June): 323–37.
71. Gerhardt, Michael J. 1991. “The Role of Precedent in Constitutional Decision­ making and Theory.” George Washington Law Review 60(November): 68–159.
72. Gibson, James, L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law & Society Review 23(3): 469–96.
73. Gibson, James, L. 1997. United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, Phase II: 1953–1993 (Study #6987). ICPSR version. Houston, TX: University of Hous­ton [producer], 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Politi­cal and Social Research [distributor], 1997.
74. Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Sup­port for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (August): 635–64.
75. Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Vanessa A. Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92(June): 343–58.
76. Gill, Jeff. n.d. “Interactions in Generalized Linear Models: Theoretical Issues and an Application to Judicial Decision Making.” University of California, Davis. Typescript.
77. Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
78. Gillman, Howard. 1999. “The Court as an Idea, Not a Building (or a Game): Interpretive Institutionalism and the Analysis of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Cor­nell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79. Gillman, Howard. 2003. “Separating the Wheat from the Chaff in The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited.” Law and Courts Newsletter 13(Summer): 12–18.
80. Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 1990. “Remarks on Writing Separately.” Washington Law Review 65(January): 133–50.
81. Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 1995. “Communicating and Commenting on the Court’s Work.” Georgetown Law Journal 83(July): 2119–28.
82. Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 2004. “Speaking in a Judicial Voice: Reflections on Roe v. Wade.” In Judges on Judging: Views from the Bench. 2nd ed. Ed. David M. O’Brien. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
83. Gitlow v. New York. 1925. 268 U.S. 652.
84. Glick, James. 1994. “The Impact of Permissive Judicial Policies: The U.S. Supreme Court and the Right to Die.” Political Research Quarterly 47(March): 207–22.
85. Goldman, Sheldon. 1975. “Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Ap­peals, Revisited.” American Political Science Review 69(June): 491–506.
86. Grady v. Corbin. 1990. 495 U.S. 508.
87. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle. 2003. 156 L.Ed. 2d 414.
88. Greene, William H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
89. Greenhouse, Linda. 2000. “Another Kind of Bitter Split.” The New York Times, Dec. 14:A1.
90. Grosskopf, Anke, and Jeffery J. Mondak. 1998. “Do Attitudes toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 51(September): 633–54.
91. Grutter v. Bollinger. 2003. 156 L.Ed. 2d 304.
92. Harris v. United States. 2002. 536 U.S. 545.
93. Harris, Peter. 1985. “Ecology and Culture in the Communication of Precedent among State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970.” Law & Society Review 19(3): 449–86.
94. Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 94(March): 89–100.
95. Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2003. Public Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Cam­bridge University Press.
96. Hubbard v. United States. 1995. 514 U.S. 695.
97. Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board. 1976. 424 U.S. 507.
98. Illinois v. Gates. 1983. 462 U.S. 213.
99. Johnson, Charles A. 1979. “Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Deci­sions: A Quantitative Examination.” American Journal of Political Science 23(November): 792–804.
100. Johnson, Charles A. 1985. “Citations to Authority in Supreme Court Opinions.” Law and Policy 7(October): 509–23.
101. Johnson, Charles A. 1986. “Follow-Up Citations in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Western Politi­cal Quarterly 39(September): 538–47.
102. Johnson, Charles A. 1987. “Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making: Lower Federal Court Uses of Supreme Court Decisions.” Law & Society Review 21(2): 325–40.
103. Johnson, Charles A., and Bradley C. Canon. 1984. Judicial Policies: Implemen­tation and Impact. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
104. Johnson, Timothy R. 2004. Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court. Albany: State University of New York Press.
105. Johnson, Timothy R., and Andrew Martin. 1998. “The Public’s Conditional Re­sponse to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 92(June): 299–327.
106. Kahn, Ronald. 1999. “Institutional Norms and Supreme Court Decision Making: The Rehnquist Court on Privacy and Religion.” In Supreme Court Decision­Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
107. Kempin, Frederick G., Jr. 1959. “Precedent and Stare Decisis: The Critical Years, 1800 to 1850.” The American Journal of Legal History 3(January): 28–54.
108. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social In­quiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
109. King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 2001. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Political Analysis 9(Spring): 137–63.
110. Klein, David E. 2002. Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. New York: Cambridge University Press.
111. Klein, David E., and Robert Hume. 2003. “Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance.” Law & Society Review 37(September): 579–606.
112. Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996. “The Norm of Stare Decisis.” American Journal of Political Science 40(November): 1018–35.
113. Kosma, Montgomery N. 1998. “Measuring the Influence of Supreme Court Jus­tices.” Journal of Legal Studies 27(June): 333–72.
114. Krippendorf, Klaus. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodol­ogy. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
115. Kritzer, Herbert M. 2003. “Have Segal and Spaeth Finally Driven a Stake through the Heart of the Legal Model?” Law and Courts Newsletter 13 (Summer): 19–22.
116. Landes, William M., Lawrence Lessig, and Michael E. Solimine. 1998. “Judicial Influence: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges.” Journal of Legal Studies 27(June): 271–332.
117. Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 1976. “Legal Precedent: A Theoret­ical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Law and Economics 19(August): 249–307.
118. Landis, Richard J., and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33(March): 159–74.
119. Leiter, Brian. 1997. “Rethinking Legal Realism: Toward a Naturalized Jurispru­dence.” Texas Law Review 76(December): 267–315.
120. Lemon v. Kurtzman. 1971. 403 U.S. 602.
121. Levi, Edward H. 1949. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: Univer­sity of Chicago Press.
122. Lim, Youngsik. 2000. “An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Justices’ Deci­sion Making.” Journal of Legal Studies 29(June): 721–52.
123. Lloyd Corporation v. Tanner. 1972. 407 U.S. 551.
124. Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
125. Maltz, Earl. 1988. “The Nature of Precedent.” North Carolina Law Review 66(January): 367–92.
126. Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge Uni­versity Press.
127. Maltzman, Forrest, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1996. “May It Please the Chief? Opin­ion Assignments in the Rehnquist Court.” American Journal of Political Science 40(May): 421–43.
128. Mapp v. Ohio. 1961. 367 U.S. 643.
129. Martin, Andrew. 2001. “Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers.” American Political Science Review 95(June): 361–78.
130. Mathews v. Eldridge. 1976. 424 U.S. 319.
131. Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners. 1947. 332 U.S. 495.
132. McCune, David. 1995. “United States v. Dixon: What Does Same Offense Re­ally Mean?” Arkansas Law Review 48(June): 709–53.
133. McGuire, Kevin T., and Michael MacKuen. 2001. “A New Look at Stare Deci­sis: Citation Patterns on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 19–22.
134. Merryman, John Henry. 1954. “The Authority of Authority: What the Califor­nia Supreme Court Cited in 1950.” Stanford Law Review 6(July): 613–73.
135. Merryman, John Henry. 1977. “Toward a Theory of Citations: An Empirical Study of the Cita­tion Practice of the California Supreme Court in 1950, 1960, and 1970.” Southern California Law Review 50(March): 381–428.
136. Minnick v. Mississippi. 1990. 498 U.S. 146.
137. Miranda v. Arizona. 1966. 384 U.S. 436.
138. Moe v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation. 1976. 425 U.S. 463.
139. Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12(December): 363–84.
140. Mondak, Jeffery J. 1994. “Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Con­texts of Legitimation.” Political Research Quarterly 47(September):675–92.
141. Mondak, Jeffery J., and Shannon Ishiyama Smithey. 1997. “The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 59(November): 1114–42.
142. Murphy, Walter F., James E. Fleming, and Sotirios A. Barber. 1995. American Constitutional Interpretation. 2nd ed. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
143. Murphy, Walter F., and C. Herman Pritchett. 1979. Courts, Judges, and Politics: An Introduction to the Judicial Process. New York: Random House.
144. Nalls, Charles H., and Paul R. Bardos. 1991. “Stare Decisis and the U.S. Court of International Trade: Two Case Studies of a Perennial Issue.” Fordham In­ternational Law Journal 14(1): 139–85.
145. Neal v. United States. 1996. 516 U.S. 284.
146. Nicholson, Stephen P., and Robert M. Howard. 2002. “Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore.” Journal of Politics 65 (August): 676–95.
147. Pacelle, Richard L., and Lawrence Baum. 1992. “Supreme Court Authority in the Judiciary: A Study of Remands.” American Politics Quarterly 29(April): 169–91.
148. Padden, Amy L. 1994. “Overruling Decisions in the Supreme Court: The Role of a Decision’s Vote, Age, and Subject Matter in the Application of Stare Decisis after Payne v. Tennessee.” Georgetown Law Journal 82(April): 1689–1732.
149. Payne v. Tennessee. 1991. 501 U.S. 808.
150. Peczenik, Aleksander. 1997. “The Binding Force of Precedent.” In Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study, ed. D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
151. Phelps, Glenn A., and John B. Gates. 1991. “The Myth of Jurisprudence: Inter­pretive Theory in the Constitutional Opinions of Justices Rehnquist and Bren­nan.” Santa Clara Law Review 31(3): 567–96.
152. Phillips, Scott, and Ryken Grattet. 2000. “Judicial Rhetoric, Meaning-Making, and the Institutionalization of Hate Crime Law.” Law & Society Review 34(3): 567–606.
153. Planned Parenthood v. Casey. 1992. 505 U.S. 833.
154. Powell, Lewis F., Jr. 1990. “Stare Decisis and Judicial Restraint.” Washington and Lee Law Review 47(Spring): 281–90.
155. Priest, George, and Bejamin Klein. 1976. “The Selection of Disputes for Litiga­tion.” Journal of Legal Studies 13(January): 1–55.
156. Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937–1947. New York: MacMillan.
157. Rasmusen, Eric. 1994. “Judicial Legitimacy as a Repeated Game.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 10(April): 63–83.
158. Rehnquist, James C. 1986. “The Power That Shall Be Vested in a Precedent: Stare Decisis, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court.” Boston University Law Review 66(March): 345–76.
159. Richards, Mark J., and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96(June): 305–20.
160. Rohde, David W. 1972. “Policy Goals, Strategic Choice, and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 16(November):652–82.
161. Rohde, David W., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
162. Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
163. Rowland, C. K., and Robert A. Carp. 1996. Politics and Judgment in the Federal District Courts. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
164. Scalia, Antonin. 1994. “The Dissenting Opinion.” Journal of Supreme Court History 1994: 33–44.
165. Schaefer, Walter V. 2004. “Precedent and Policy: Judicial Opinions and Decision Making.” In Judges on Judging: Views from the Bench. 2nded. Ed. David M. O’Brien. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
166. Schauer, Frederick. 1987. “Precedent.” Stanford Law Review 39(February): 571–605.
167. Schwartz, Bernard. 1996. Decision: How the Supreme Court Decides Cases. New York: Oxford University Press.
168. Scheb, John M., and William Lyons. 2001. “Judicial Behavior and Public Opin­ion: Popular Expectations Regarding the Factors that Influence Supreme Court Decisions.” Political Behavior 32(June): 181–94.
169. Schmidhauser, John R. 1962. “Stare Decisis, Dissent, and the Background of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.” University of Toronto Law Journal 14(2): 194–212.
170. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1984. “Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962–1981.” American Political Science Review 78(December):891–900.
171. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1985. “Measuring Change on the Supreme Court: Examining Alterna­tive Models.” American Journal of Political Science 29(August): 461–79.
172. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Atti­tudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
173. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1996. “The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices.” American Journal of Political Science 40(November): 971–1003.
174. Segal, Jeffrey A. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
175. Segal, Jeffrey A. 2003. “Reply to the Critics of the Supreme Court Attitudinal Model Re­visited.” Law and Courts Newsletter 13(Summer): 31–38.
176. Shapiro, Martin. 1965. “Stability and Change in Judicial Decision-Making: In­crementalism or Stare Decisis.” Law in Transition Quarterly 2(Summer): 134–57.
177. Shapiro, Martin. 1972. “Toward a Theory of ‘Stare Decisis.’” Journal of Legal Studies 1(January): 125–34.
178. Shepard’s Company. 1993. Shepard’s Citations In-House Training Manual. Photocopy.
179. Smith v. Robbins. 2000. 528 U.S. 259.
180. Songer, Donald R. 1987. “The Impact of the Supreme Court on Trends in Eco­nomic Policy Making in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Pol­itics 49(August): 830–41.
181. Smith v. Robbins. 1988. “Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Impact: Miranda in Five State Courts.” American Politics Quarterly 16(October): 425–44.
182. Songer, Donald R., and Susan Haire. 1992. “Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Courts of Ap­peals.” American Journal of Political Science 36(November): 963–82.
183. Songer, Donald R., and Stefanie A. Lindquist. 1996. “Not the Whole Story: The Impact of Justices’ Values on Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 40(November): 1049–63.
184. Songer, Donald R., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Charles M. Cameron. 1994. “The Hier­archy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38(August): 673–96.
185. Songer, Donald R., and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1990. “Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Western Political Quarterly 43(June):297–316.
186. Songer, Donald R., Reginald S. Sheehan, and Susan B. Haire. 2000. Continuity and Change on the United States Courts of Appeals. Ann Arbor, MI: Univer­sity of Michigan Press.
187. Spaeth, Harold J. 1965. “Jurimetrics and Professor Mendelson: A Troubled Re­lationship.” Journal of Politics 27(November):875–80.
188. Spaeth, Harold J. 1995. Expanded United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1946–1968 Terms. 1st Release. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
189. Spaeth, Harold J. 2001. United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1953–2000 Terms. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
190. Spaeth, Harold J., and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1999. Majority Rule or Minority Will. New York: Cambridge University Press.
191. Spinelli v. United States. 1969. 393 U.S. 410.
192. Spriggs, James F., II. 1996. “The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies: A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact.” Ameri­can Journal of Political Science 40(November): 1122–51.
193. Spriggs, James F. 1997. “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions.” Political Research Quarterly 50(September): 567–93.
194. Spriggs, James F. 2003. “The Attitudinal Model: An Explanation of Case Dispositions, Not Substantive Policy Outcomes.” Law and Courts Newsletter 13(Summer): 23–26.
195. Spriggs, James F., II, and Thomas G. Hansford. 2000. “Measuring Legal Change: The Reliability and Validity of Shepard’s Citations.” Political Research Quar­terly 53(June): 327–41.
196. Spriggs, James F. 2001. “Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent.” Journal of Politics 63(August): 1091–11.
197. Spriggs, James F. 2002. “The U.S. Supreme Court’s Incorporation and Interpretation of Precedent.” Law & Society Review 36(1): 139–60.
198. Stern, Nat. 1989. “State Action, Establishment Clause, and Defamation: Blue­prints for Civil Liberties in the Rehnquist Court.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 57(4): 1175–242.
199. Stevens, John Paul. 1983. “The Life Span of a Judge-Made Rule.” New York University Law Review 58(April): 1–21.
200. Traut, Carol Ann, and Craig F. Emmert. 1998. “Expanding the Integrated Model of Judicial Decision Making: The California Justices and Capital Punish­ment.” Journal of Politics 60(November): 1166–80.
201. Tuan Anh Nguyen v. I.N.S. 2001. 533 U.S. 53.
202. Tushnet, Mark. 1988. Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitu­tional Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
203. Tyler, Tom R. 1984. “The Role of Perceived Injustice in Defendants’ Evaluations of Their Courtroom Experience.” Law & Society Review 18(1): 51–74.
204. Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
205. Tyler, Tom R., and Gregory Mitchell. 1994. “Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority: The United States Supreme Court and Abor­tion Rights.” Duke Law Journal 43(February): 703–802.
206. Tyler, Tom R., and Kenneth Rasinski. 1991. “Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law & Society Review 25(3): 621–29.
207. Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1959. “An Empirical Analysis of Selected Aspects of Lawmak­ing of the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Public Law 8(Fall): 414–36.
208. Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1970. “Dissent Behavior and the Social Background of Supreme Court Justices.” Journal of Politics 32(August): 580–98.
209. Unger, Roberto. 1983. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
210. United States v. Bauer. 1947. 331 U.S. 532.
211. United States v. Bramblett, 1955. 348 U.S. 503.
212. United States v. Felix. 1992. 503 U.S. 378.
213. United States v. Morrison. 2000. 529 U.S. 598.
214. Van Hees, Martin, and Bernard Steunenberg. 2000. “The Choices Judges Make: Court Rulings, Personal Values, and Legal Constraints.” Journal of Theoreti­cal Politics 12(July): 305–23.
215. Vasquez v. Hillery. 1986. 474 U.S. 254.
216. Vinson, Fred. M. 1949. “Work of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Texas Bar Journal 12(December):551–52, 576–78.
217. Wahlbeck, Paul J. 1997. “The Life of the Law: Judicial Politics and Legal Change.” Journal of Politics 59(August): 778–802.
218. Wahlbeck, Paul J. 1998. “The Development of a Legal Rule: The Federal Common Law of Public Nuisance.” Law & Society Review 32(3): 613–37.
219. Wahlbeck, Paul J., James. F. Spriggs II, and Forrest Maltzman. 1999. “The Poli­tics of Dissents and Concurrences on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Pol­itics Quarterly 27(October): 488–514.
220. Wald, Patricia M. 1995. “The Rhetoric and the Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings.” University of Chicago Law Review 62(Fall): 1371–419.
221. Walsh, David J. 1997. “On the Meaning and Pattern of Legal Citations: Evi­dence from State Wrongful Discharge Precedent Cases.” Law & Society Re­view 31(2): 337–60.
222. Warren Trading Post v. Arizona Tax Commission. 1965. 380 U.S. 685.
223. Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 73(November): 1–35.
224. Weeks v. United States. 1914. 232 U.S. 383.
225. Westerland, Chad. 2003. “Who Owns the Majority Opinion? An Examination of Policy Making on the Supreme Court.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 28–31.
226. White, Halbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48(May): 817–38.
227. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker. 1980. 448 U.S. 136.
228. Wolf v. Colorado. 1949. 338 U.S. 25.
229. Wood, B. Dan, and James E. Anderson. 1993. “The Politics of U.S. Antitrust Reg­ulation.” American Journal of Political Science 37(February): 1–39.
230. Yates v. Evatt. 1991. 500 U.S. 391.