Introduction to the special topic Embodied and Grounded Cognition

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue AUG, 2011, Pages

  Borghi, Anna M ^a   Pecher, Diane ^b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955244377     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00187     Document Type: Editorial

References (31)

1. Barbey, A., and Patterson, R. (2011). Architecture of explanatory inference in the human prefrontal cortex. Front. Psychol. 2:162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00162
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577-660.
3. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2008). "Language and simulation in conceptual processing," in Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning, eds M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 245-283.
4. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2009). "Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings," in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds N. Taatgen and H. van Rijn (Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society), 2304-2309
5. Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D., and Scorolli, C. (2011). Manipulating objects and telling words: a study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Front. Psychol. 2:15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015
6. Collins, J., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., and Coulson, S. (2011). Modality switching in a property verification task: an ERP study of what happens when candles flicker after high heels click. Front. Psychol. 2:10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00010
7. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schutz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., and Liepelt, R. (2011). How 'social' is the social Simon effect? Front. Psychol. 2:84. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2011.00084
8. Dove, G. (2011). On the need for embodied and disembodied cognition. Front. Psychol. 1:242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242
9. Flusberg, S. J., Thibodeau, P. H., Sternberg, D. A., and Glick, J. J. (2010). A connectionist approach to embodied conceptual metaphor. Front. Psychol. 1:197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00197
10. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behav. Brain Sci. 20, 1-55.
11. Hald, L. A., Marshall, J., Janssen, D. P., and Alan, G. (2011). Switching modalities in a sentence verification task: ERP evidence for embodied language processing. Front. Psychol. 2:45. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045
12. Hemeren, P. E., and Thill, S. (2011). Deriving motor primitives through action segmentation. Front. Psychol. 1:243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00243
13. Kessler, K., and Rutherford, H. (2010). The two forms of visuo-spatial perspective taking are differently embodied and subserve different spatial prepositions. Front. Psychol. 1:213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00213
14. Kranjec, A., and Chatterjee, A. (2010). Are temporal concepts embodied? A challenge for cognitive neuroscience. Front. Psychol. 1:240. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2010.00240
15. Lynott, D., and Connell, L. (2010). Embodied conceptual combination. Front. Psychol. 1:212. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2010.00212
16. Mahon, B., and Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J. Physiol. Paris 102, 59-70.
17. Marsh, E. R., and Glenberg, A. M. (2010). The embodied statistician. Front. Psychol. 1:184. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2010.00184
18. Mizelle, J. C., and Wheaton, L. A. (2010). The neuroscience of storing and molding tool action concepts: How "plastic" is grounded cognition? Front. Psychol. 1:195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00195
19. Parisi, D. (2011). The other half of the embodied mind. Front. Psychol. 2:69. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00069
20. Pecher, D., and Boot, I. (2011). Numbers in space: differences between concrete and abstract situations. Front. Psychol. 2:121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00121
21. Pecher, D., Boot, I., and van Dantzig, S. (2011). "Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond," in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 54, ed. B. Ross (Burlington: Academic Press), 217-248.
22. Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., Spivey, M., and McRae, K. (2011). The mechanics of embodiment: a dialogue on embodiment and computational modeling. Front. Psychol. 2:5. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2011.00005
23. Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 253-336.
24. Rothkopf, C. A., and Ballard, D. H. (2010). Credit assignment in multiple goal embodied visuomotor behavior. Front. Psychol. 1:173. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2010.00173
25. Rueschemeyer, S., Glenberg, A. M., Kaschak, M. P., Mueller, K., and Friederici, A. D. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up contributions to understanding sentences describing objects in motion. Front. Psychol. 1:183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00183
26. Ursino, M., Cuppini, C., and Magosso, E. (2010). A computational model of the lexical-semantic system, based on a grounded cognition approach. Front. Psychol. 1:221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00221
27. van Dam, W. O., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Lindemann, O., and Bekkering, H. (2010). Context effects in embodied lexical-semantic processing. Front. Psychol. 1:150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00150
28. van Elk, M., Slors, M., and Bekkering, H. (2010). Embodied language understanding requires an enactivist paradigm of cognition. Front. Psychol. 1:234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00234
29. Vlainic, E., Liepelt, R., Colzato, L. S., Prinz, W., and Hommel, B. (2010). The virtual co-actor: the social Simon effect does not rely on online feedback from the other. Front. Psychol. 1:208. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2010.00208
30. Wellsby, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., and Owen, W. J. (2010). Some insults are easier to detect: the embodied insult detection effect. Front. Psychol. 1:198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00198
31. Zwaan, R. A., and Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychol. Bull. 123, 162-185.