Manipulating objects and telling words: A study on concrete and abstract words acquisition

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue FEB, 2011, Pages

  Borghi, Anna M ^a,b   Flumini, Andrea ^a   Cimatti, Felice ^c   Marocco, Davide ^d   Scorolli, Claudia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Categorization; Concepts; Embodied cognition; Grounded cognition; Language acquisition; Language grounding

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861773740     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., and Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 31, 578-602.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577-660.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617-645.
4. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2008). " Language and simulation in conceptual processing," in Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning, eds M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 245-284.
5. Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 84-91.
6. Barsalou, L. W., and Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). " Situating abstract concepts," in Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thought, eds D. Pecher and R. Zwaan (New York: Cambridge University Press), 129-163.
7. Boot, I., and Pecher, D. (2009). Similarity is closeness: metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 29, 1-13.
8. Borghi, A. M., and Barsalou, L. W. (2001). Perspective in the Conceptualization of Categories, Abstracts. Orlando: Psychonomic Society
9. Borghi, A., and Caramelli, N. (2001). " Taxonomic relations and cognitive economy in conceptual organization," in Proceedings of 23rd Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, eds J. D. Moore and K. Stenning (London: Erlbaum), 98-103.
10. Borghi, A. M. (2004). Objects concepts and action: extracting affordances from objects' parts. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 115, 1, 69-96.
11. Borghi, A. M., Caramelli, N., and Setti, A. (2005). Conceptual information on objects' locations. Brain Lang. 93, 140-151.
12. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2009). " Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings," in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds N. Taatgen and H. van Rijn (Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society), 2304-2309.
13. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48, 763-773.
14. Casasanto, D., and Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: using space to think about time. Cognition 106, 579-593.
15. Clark, A. (1998). " Magic words: how language augments human computation," in Language and Thought. Interdisciplinary Themes, eds P. Carruthers and J. Boucher (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 162-183.
16. Crutch, S. J., and Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain 128, 615-627.
17. Crystal, D. (1995). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2010). Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 20, 468-478.
19. Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: a call for representational pluralism. Cognition 110, 412-431.
20. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts. Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., and Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 905-919.
22. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335-346.
23. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Louwerse, M. M., and Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition 114, 96-104.
25. Marocco, D., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, K., and Belpaeme, T. (2010). Grounding action words in the sensorimotor interaction with the world: experiments with a simulated iCub humanoid robot. Front. Neurorobot. 4:7. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2010.00007
26. Mirolli, M., and Parisi, D. (in press). Towards a vygotskyan cognitive robotics: the role of language as a cognitive tool. N. Ideas Psychol.
27. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., and Madigan, S. A. (1986). Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 words. J. Exp. Psychol. 76(Suppl.), 1-25.
28. Rüschemeyer, S. A., Brass, M., and Friederici, A. D. (2007). Comprehending prehending: neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems source. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 855-865.
29. Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., and Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neuroimage 27, 188-200.
30. Scorolli, C., and Borghi, A. (2007). Sentence comprehension and action: effector specific modulation of the motor system. Brain Res. 1130, 119-124.
31. Scorolli, C., Jacquet, P., Binkofski, F., Nicoletti, R., Tessari, A., and Borghi, A. M. (2010). " Processing Abstract and concrete sentences: a role of primary motor cortex?" in Fourth Annual Rovereto workshop on Concepts Actions and Objects, Functional and Neural perspective (Rovereto: CAOS).
32. Setti, A., and Caramelli, N. (2005). " Different domains in abstract concepts," in Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds B. Bara, L. Barsalou, and M. Bucciarelli (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 1997-2002.
33. Steels, L. (2003). Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 308-312.
34. Sugita, Y., and Tani, J. (2005). Learning semantic combinatoriality from the interaction between linguistic and behavioral processes. Adapt. Behav. 13, 211-225.
35. Tikhanoff, V., Cangelosi, A., Fitzpatrick, P., Metta, G., Natale, L., and Nori, F. (2008). " An open-source simulator for cognitive robotics research: the prototype of the iCub humanoid robot simulator," in Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop (PerMIS08), Gaithersburg, MD.
36. Wauters, L. N., Tellings, A. E. J. M., Van Bon, W. H. J., and Van Haaften, A. W. (2003). Mode of acquisition of word meanings: the viability of a theoretical construct. Appl. Psycholinguist. 24, 385-406.
37. Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J., and Xu, X. (2001). " Imagery, context availability, contextual constraint and abstractness," in Proceedings of the XXIII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Edinburgh, Scotland, August 1-4, 2001 (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Blackwell.
39. Wu, L. L., and Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. Acta Psychol. 132, 173-189.