Effective connectivity analysis of fMRI and MEG data collected under identical paradigms

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1156-1165

  Plis, Sergey M ^a,b   Weisend, Michael P ^a   Damaraju, Eswar ^a   Eichele, Tom ^c   Mayer, Andy ^a   Clark, Vincent P ^a   Lane, Terran ^b   Calhoun, Vince D ^a,b  

^a MIND RESEARCH NETWORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Bayesian networks; Effective connectivity; FMRI; MEG

Indexed keywords

BRAIN NETWORKS; BRAIN REGIONS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; CONNECTIVITY ANALYSIS; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITY; FMRI; FMRI DATA; FUNCTIONAL DATAS; FUNCTIONAL MRI; LIMITED INFORMATION; MEG; MULTIPLE MODALITIES;

BRAIN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 82955233833     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Hillis W.D. The Connection Machine 1989, The MIT Press.
2. E.T. Rolls, G. Deco, The noisy brain: stochastic dynamics as a principle of brain function, 2010.
3. Le Bihan D., Mangin J.F., Poupon C., Clark C.A., Pappata S., Molko N., Chabriat H. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2001, 13(4):534-546.
4. Hagmann P., Kurant M., Gigandet X., Thiran P., Wedeen V.J., Meuli R., Thiran J.P. Mapping human whole-brain structural networks with diffusion MRI. PLoS One 2007, 2(7):597.
5. Hagmann P., Cammoun L., Gigandet X., Meuli R., Honey C.J., Wedeen V.J., Sporns O. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biology 2008, 6(7):159.
6. Sporns R., Tononi O., Kötter G. PLoS Computational Biology 2005, 1(4):e42. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042〉. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042.
7. Deco G., Jirsa V., McIntosh A.R., Sporns O., Kötter R. Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 2009, 106(25):10302-10307. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901831106〉.
8. Van Dijk K.R.A., Hedden T., Venkataraman A., Evans K.C., Lazar S.W., Buckner R.L. Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103(1):297.
9. Hämäläinen M.S., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics 1993, 65:413-497.
10. Huettel S.A., Song A.W., McCarthy G. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2004, Sinauer Associates Publishers, Sunderland, MA, USA.
11. Y.O. Halchenko, S.J. Hanson, B.A. Pearlmutter, Multimodal integration: fMRI, MRI, EEG, and MEG, Signal Processing and Communications, Dekker, 2005, pp. 223-265 (Chapter 8).
12. Jordan M.I. Learning in Graphical Models (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning) 1998, The MIT Press.
13. Friston K.J. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Human Brain Mapping 1994, 2(1-2):56-78.
14. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference 1988, Morgan Kaufmann.
15. Friston K.J., Harrison L., Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 2003, 19(4):1273-1302. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03) 00202-7〉.
16. Geweke J. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1982, 77(378):304-313.
17. Roebroeck A., Formisano E., Goebel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage 2005, 25(1):230-242.
18. Cowell R.G., Dawid A.P., Lauritzen S.L., Spiegelhalter D.J. Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems 1999, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
19. Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference 2000, Cambridge University Press.
20. Grzegorczyk M., Husmeier D. Improving the structure MCMC sampler for Bayesian networks by introducing a new edge reversal move. Machine Learning 2008, 71(2-3):265-305. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10994-008-5057-7〉.
21. J. Burge, T. Lane, H. Link, S. Qiu, V.P. Clark, Discrete dynamic Bayesian network analysis of fMRI data, Human Brain Mapping 〈〉, doi:10.1002/hbm.20490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20490.
22. Kim D., Burge J., Lane T., Pearlson G.D., Kiehl K.A., Calhoun V.D. Hybrid ICA-Bayesian network approach reveals distinct effective connectivity differences in schizophrenia. NeuroImage 2008, 42(4):1560-1568.
23. Koller D., Friedman N. Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques 2009, The MIT Press.
24. Jensen F.V., Nielsen T.D. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 2007, Springer-Verlag.
25. Rubinov M., Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 2010, 52(3):1059-1069. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003.
26. D.M. Chickering, D. Geiger, D. Heckerman, Learning Bayesian networks is NP-hard, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-94-17, 1994.
27. Liu J.S. Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing 2002, Springer.
28. Gilks W.R. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice 1995, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
29. K.P. Murphy, The Bayes net toolbox for MATLAB.
30. Shah A., Woolf P. Python environment for Bayesian learning: inferring the structure of Bayesian networks from knowledge and data. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2009, 10:159-162.
31. Bollobás B. Random Graphs 2001, Cambridge University Press.
32. Newman M.E.J. Detecting community structure in networks. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter 2004, 38(2):321. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00124-y〉. 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00124-y.
33. Girvan M., Newman M.E.J. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2002, 99(12):7821. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799〉. 10.1073/pnas.122653799.
34. Newman M.E.J. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E 2001, 64(1):016132. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132〉. 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132.
35. Logothetis N.K., Wandell B.A. Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annual Review of Physiology 2004, 66(1):735-769. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.082602.092845〉. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.082602. 092845.
36. Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S., Poeppel D., Marantz A., Miyashita Y. Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2001, 48(7):760-771.
37. Jun S.-C., George J.S., Pare-Blagoev J., Plis S.M., Ranken D.M., Schmidt D.M., Wood C.C. Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data. NeuroImage 2005, 28(1):84-98. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.003〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.003.
38. Fox M.D., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Corbetta M., Van Essen D.C., Raichle M.E. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(27):9673-9678. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504136102〉. 10.1073/pnas.0504136102.
39. S.M. Smith, K.L. Miller, G. Salimi-Khorshidi, M. Webster, C.F. Beckmann, T.E. Nichols, J.D. Ramsey, M.W. Woolrich, Network modelling methods for fMRI, NeuroImage 〈〉. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063.
40. Calhoun V.D., Eichele T., Pearlson G. Functional brain networks in schizophrenia: a review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2009, 3:1-12.
41. Marreiros A.C., Kiebel S.J., Friston K.J. Dynamic causal modelling for fMRI: a two-state model. NeuroImage 2008, 39(1):269-278. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.019〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.019.
42. Li J., Wang Z.J., Palmer S.J., McKeown M.J. Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of fMRI: a comparison of group-analysis methods. NeuroImage 2008, 41(2):398-407. 〈http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18406629〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.068.
43. Kiebel S.J., Kloppel S., Weiskopf N., Friston K.J. Dynamic causal modeling: a generative model of slice timing in fMRI. NeuroImage 2007, 34(4):1487-1496. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.026〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.026.
44. Kiebel S.J., David O., Friston K.J. Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses in EEG/MEG with lead field parameterization. NeuroImage 2006, 30(4):1273-1284. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.055〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.055.
45. Clark V.P., Fannon S., Lai S., Benson R., Bauer L. Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 83(5):3133-3139.
46. Cox R.W., et al. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research 1996, 29(3):162-173.
47. Hauk O. Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. NeuroImage 2004, 21(4):1612-1621.
48. Lin F.H., Belliveau J.W., Dale A.M., Hämäläinen M.S. Distributed current estimates using cortical orientation constraints. Human Brain Mapping 2006, 27(1):1-13.
49. Fischl B., Van Der Kouwe A., Destrieux C., Halgren E., Segonne F., Salat D.H., Busa E., Seidman L.J., Goldstein J., Kennedy D., et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(1):11.
50. Daunizeau J., Grova C., Marrelec G., Mattout J., Jbabdi S., Pélégrini-Issac M., Lina J.M., Benali H. Symmetrical event-related EEG/fMRI information fusion in a variational Bayesian framework. NeuroImage 2007, 36(1):69-87. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.044〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.044.
51. Eichele T., Specht K., Moosmann M., Jongsma M.L.A., Quiroga R.Q., Nordby H., Hugdahl K. Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102(49):17798.
52. Bledowski C., Prvulovic D., Hoechstetter K., Scherg M., Wibral M., Goebel R., Linden D.E.J. Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: a combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(42):9353-9360. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1897-04.2004〉. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1897-04.2004.
53. Eichele T., Calhoun V.D., Moosmann M., Specht K., Jongsma M.L.A., Quiroga R.Q., Nordby H., Hugdahl K. Unmixing concurrent EEG-fMRI with parallel independent component analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 2008, 67(3):222-234. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.010〉. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.010.
54. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1992, 9(4):456.
55. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24(4):375-425.
56. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., Alho K. The mismatch negativity in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118(12):2544-2590. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026〉. 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026.
57. Burge J., Lane T. Learning class-discriminative dynamic Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning 2005, 97-104. ACM.
58. Li J., Wang Z.J., McKeown M.J. Dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNS) demonstrate impaired brain connectivity during performance of simultaneous movements in Parkinson's disease. 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006 2006, 964-967. IEEE.
59. S.M. Plis, V.D. Calhoun, M.P. Weisend, T. Eichele, E. Besada-Portas, T. Lane, Efficient sequential inference in DBNs: steps towards joint MEG/fMRI connectivity analysis, 2009.
60. Chen R., Herskovits E.H. Network analysis of mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage 2006, 29(4):1252-1259. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.020〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08. 020.
61. A.L. Delcher, S. Kasif, H.R. Goldberg, W.H. Hsu, Protein secondary structure modelling with probabilistic networks, in: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems and Molecular Biology, 1993, pp. 109-117.
62. Friedman N., Linial M., Nachman I., Pe'er D. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. Journal of Computational Biology 2000, 7(3-4):601-620.
63. Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science 2004, 303(5659):799.
64. Segal E., Shapira M., Regev A., Pe'er D., Botstein D., Koller D., Friedman N. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nature Genetics 2003, 34(2):166-176.
65. Jansen R., Yu H., Greenbaum D., Kluger Y., Krogan N.J., Chung S., Emili A., Snyder M., Greenblatt J.F., Gerstein M. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 2003, 302(5644):449.
66. Gelman A., Carlin J.B., Stern H.S., Rubina D.B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2003, Chapman & Hall/CRC. second ed.
67. Havlicek M., Jan J., Brazdil M., Calhoun V.D. Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data. NeuroImage 2010, 53(1):65-77. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.063〉. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.063.
68. Plis S.M., Calhoun V.D., Eichele T., Weisend M.P., Lane T. MEG and fMRI fusion for nonlinear estimation of neural and BOLD signal changes. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 2010, 4:12. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2010.00114〉. 10.3389/fninf.2010.00114.