Mechano-sensing and cell migration: A 3D model approach

Physical Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Borau, C ^a,b   Kamm, R D ^b   Garcia Aznar J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL MOTION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METABOLISM; VISCOSITY;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; VISCOSITY;

EID: 82955201867     PISSN: 14783967     EISSN: 14783975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/6/066008     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Lauffenburger D A and Horwitz A F 1996 Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process Cell 84 359-69 (Pubitemid 26058561)
2. Even-Ram S and Yamada K M 2005 Cell migration in 3d matrix Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17 524-32 (Pubitemid 41267167)
3. Ehrbar M, Sala A, Lienemann P, Ranga A, Mosiewicz K, Bittermann A, Rizzi S C, Weber F E and Lutolf M P 2011 Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3d cell migration and remodeling Biophys. J. 100 284-93
4. Ingber D E 2010 From cellular mechanotransduction to biologically inspired engineering Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38 1148-61
5. Discher D E, Janmey P and Wang Y L 2005 Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate Science 310 1139-43 (Pubitemid 41681732)
6. Bershadsky A D, Balaban N Q and Geiger B 2003 Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19 677-95 (Pubitemid 37487365)
7. Yang T Y and Zaman M H 2007 Free energy landscape of receptor-mediated cell adhesion J. Chem. Phys. 126 045103
8. Yang T Y and Zaman M H 2010 Estimation of cellular adhesion forces using mean field theory Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 3 190-4
9. Lo C M, Wang H B, Dembo M and Wang Y L 2000 Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate Biophys. J. 79 144-52 (Pubitemid 30436733)
10. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M and Discher D 2004 Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses Biophys. J. 86 617-28 (Pubitemid 38067491)
11. Yeung T, Georges P C, Flanagan L A, Marg B, Ortiz M, Funaki M, Zahir N, Ming W Y, Weaver V and Janmey P A 2005 Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 60 24-34 (Pubitemid 40066224)
12. Saez A, Ghibaudo M, Buguin A, Silberzan P and Ladoux B 2007 Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 8281-6 (Pubitemid 47175479)
13. Janmey P A, Winer J P, Murray M E and Wen Q 2009 The hard life of soft cells Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 66 597-605
14. Baker E L, Bonnecaze R T and Zaman M H 2009 Extracellular matrix stiffness and architecture govern intracellular rheology in cancer Biophys. J. 97 1013-21
15. Sanz-Herrera J A, Moreo P, Garcia-Aznar J M and Doblare M 2009 On the effect of substrate curvature on cell mechanics Biomaterials 30 6674-86
16. Mitrossilis D, Fouchard J, Guiroy A, Desprat N, Rodriguez N, Fabry B and Asnacios A 2009 Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106 18243-8
17. Harunaga J S and Yamada K M 2011 Cell-matrix adhesions in 3d Matrix Biol. 30 363-8
18. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens D R and Yamada K M 2001 Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension Science 294 1708-12 (Pubitemid 33104840)
19. Bischofs I B and Schwarz U S 2003 Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 9274-9 (Pubitemid 37033919)
20. Schwarz U S and Bischofs I B 2005 Physical determinants of cell organization in soft media Med. Eng. Phys. 27 763-72 (Pubitemid 41318124)
21. Freyman T M, Yannas I V, Yokoo R and Gibson L J 2002 Fibroblast contractile force is independent of the stiffness which resists the contraction Exp. Cell Res. 272 153-62 (Pubitemid 34920683)
22. Saez A, Buguin A, Silberzan P and Ladoux B 2005 Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? Biophys. J. 89 L52-4
23. De R, Zemel A and Safran S A 2008 Do cells sense stress or strain? Measurement of cellular orientation can provide a clue Biophys. J. 94 L29-31
24. Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban N Q, Schwarz U S, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S, Kam Z, Geiger B and Bershadsky A D 2001 Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mdia1-dependent and rock-independent mechanism J. Cell Biol. 153 1175-85 (Pubitemid 34289257)
25. Kaverina I, Krylyshkina O, Beningo K, Anderson K, Wang Y L and Small J V 2002 Tensile stress stimulates microtubule outgrowth in living cells J. Cell Sci. 115 2283-91 (Pubitemid 34752972)
26. Simpson M J, Towne C, McElwain D L S and Upton Z 2010 Migration of breast cancer cells: understanding the roles of volume exclusion and cell-to-cell adhesion Phys. Rev. E 82 041901
27. Fraley S I, Feng Y, Krishnamurthy R, Kim D-H, Celedon A, Longmore G D and Wirtz D 2010 A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility Nature Cell Biol. 12 598-604
28. Hakkinen K M, Harunaga J S, Doyle A D and Yamada K M 2011 Direct comparisons of the morphology, migration, cell adhesions, and actin cytoskeleton of fibroblasts in four different three-dimensional extracellular matrices Tissue Eng. A 17 713-24
29. Friedl P and Brocker E B 2000 The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57 41-64 (Pubitemid 30105329)
30. Cukierman E, Pankov R and Yamada K M 2002 Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14 633-9 (Pubitemid 35247748)
31. Vickerman V, Blundo J, Chung S and Kamm R D 2008 Design, fabrication and implementation of a novel multi-parameter control microfluidic platform for three-dimensional cell culture and real-time imaging Lab Chip 8 1468-77
32. Chung S, Sudo R, Vickerman V, Zervantonakis I K and Kamm R D 2010 Microfluidic platforms for studies of angiogenesis, cell migration, and cell-cell interactions Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38 1164-77
33. Zaman M H, Kamm R D, Matsudaira P and Lauffenburger D A 2005 Computational model for cell migration in three-dimensional matrices Biophys. J. 89 1389-97 (Pubitemid 41099020)
34. Rangarajan R and Zaman M H 2008 Modeling cell migration in 3d: status and challenges Cell Adhes. Migr. 2 106-9
35. Harjanto D and Zaman M H 2010 Computational study of proteolysis-driven single cell migration in a three-dimensional matrix Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38 1815-25
36. Groh A and Wagner M 2011 Biased three-dimensional cell migration and collagen matrix modification Math. Biosci. 231 105-19
37. Manoussaki D 2003 A mechanochemical model of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis Esaim: Math. Modelling Numer. Anal. 37 581-99 (Pubitemid 37513125)
38. Moreo P, Garcia-Aznar J M and Doblare M 2008 Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells Acta Biomater. 4 613-21 (Pubitemid 351461285)
39. Häcker A 2011 A mathematical model for mesenchymal and chemosensitive cell dynamics J. Math. Biol. doi:10.1007/s00285-011-0415-7
40. Chopard B, Ouared R, Deutsch A, Hatzikirou H and Wolf-Gladrow D 2010 Lattice-gas cellular automaton models for biology: from fluids to cells Acta Biotheoretica 58 329-40
41. Chen N, Glazier J A, Izaguirre J A and Alber M S 2007 A parallel implementation of the cellular Potts model for simulation of cell-based morphogenesis Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 670-81 (Pubitemid 46722711)
42. Merks R M H and Koolwijk P 2009 Modeling morphogenesis in silico and in vitro: towards quantitative, predictive, cell-based modeling Math. Modelling Natural Phenom. 4 149-71
43. Palsson E 2001 A three-dimensional model of cell movement in multicellular systems Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 17 835-52 (Pubitemid 32427222)
44. Sen S, Engler A J and Discher D E 2009 Matrix strains induced by cells: computing how far cells can feel Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2 39-48
45. Petrie R J, Doyle A D and Yamada K M 2009 Random versus directionally persistent cell migration Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10 538-49
46. Friedl P and Wolf K 2010 Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model J. Cell Biol. 188 11-9
47. Buxboim A, Ivanovska I L and Discher D E 2010 Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in? J. Cell Sci. 123 297-308
48. Wang N, Naruse K, Stamenovic D, Fredberg J J, Mijailovich S M, Toric-Norrelykke I M, Polte T, Mannix R and Ingber D E 2001 Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model rid b-6966-2008 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98 7765-70 (Pubitemid 32642635)
49. Heng Y W and Koh C G 2010 Actin cytoskeleton dynamics and the cell division cycle rid a-2215-2011 Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 42 1622-33
50. Damania D, Subramanian H, Tiwari A K, Stypula Y, Kunte D, Pradhan P, Roy H K and Backman V 2010 Role of cytoskeleton in controlling the disorder strength of cellular nanoscale architecture rid b-6689-2009 Biophys. J. 99 989-96
51. Burnette D T, Burnette D T, Manley S, Sengupta P, Sougrat R, Davidson M W, Kachar B and Lippincott-Schwartz J 2011 A role for actin arcs in the leading-edge advance of migrating cells Nature Cell Biol. 13 371-82
52. Astrom J A, Kumar P B S, Vattulainen I and Karttunen M 2008 Strain hardening, avalanches, and strain softening in dense cross-linked actin networks Phys. Rev. E 77 051913
53. Astrom J A, Kumar P B S and Karttunen M 2009 Aster formation and rupture transition in semi-flexible fiber networks with mobile cross-linkers Soft Matter 5 2869-74
54. Kim T, Hwang W and Kamm R D 2009 Computational analysis of a cross-linked actin-like network Exp. Mech. 49 91-104
55. Kim T, Hwang W, Lee H and Kamm R D 2009 Computational analysis of viscoelastic properties of crosslinked actin networks PLoS Comput. Biol. 5 e1000439
56. Deshpande V S, McMeeking R M and Evans A G 2006 A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 14015-20 (Pubitemid 44452972)
57. McGarry J P, Fu J, Yang M T, Chen C S, McMeeking R M, Evans A G and Deshpande V S 2009 Simulation of the contractile response of cells on an array of micro-posts Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367 3477-97
58. Hill A V 1938 The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle Proc. R. Soc. B 126 136-95
59. Rassier D E, MacIntosh B R and Herzog W 1999 Length dependence of active force production in skeletal muscle J. Appl. Physiol. 86 1445-57 (Pubitemid 29230284)
60. Wang J H C, Goldschmidt-Clermont P and Yin F C P 2000 Contractility affects stress fiber remodeling and reorientation of endothelial cells subjected to cyclic mechanical stretching Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28 1165-71 (Pubitemid 32871900)
61. Hayakawa K, Sato N and Obinata T 2001 Dynamic reorientation of cultured cells and stress fibers under mechanical stress from periodic stretching Exp. Cell Res. 268 104-14 (Pubitemid 32678865)
62. Yoshigi M, Hoffman L M, Jensen C C, Yost H J and Beckerle M C 2005 Mechanical force mobilizes zyxin from focal adhesions to actin filaments and regulates cytoskeletal reinforcement J. Cell Biol. 171 209-15 (Pubitemid 41540014)
63. De R, Zemel A and Safran S A 2007 Dynamics of cell orientation Nature Phys. 3 655-9
64. Dokukina I V and Gracheva M E 2010 A model of fibroblast motility on substrates with different rigidities Biophys. J. 98 2794-803
65. Schmidt C E, Horwitz A F, Lauffenburger D A and Sheetz M P 1993 Integrin cytoskeletal interactions in migrating fibroblasts are dynamic, asymmetric, and regulated J. Cell Biol. 123 977-91 (Pubitemid 23333584)
66. Schafer A and Radmacher M 2005 Influence of myosin ii activity on stiffness of fibroblast cells Acta Biomater. 1 273-80 (Pubitemid 43348787)
67. Maskarinec S A, Franck C, Tirrell D A and Ravichandran G 2009 Quantifying cellular traction forces in three dimensions Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106 22108-13
68. Webster K D, Crow A and Fletcher D A 2011 An AFM-based stiffness clamp for dynamic control of rigidity PLoS One 6 e17807
69. Peyton S R and Putnam A J 2005 Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion rid e-8643-2010 J. Cell. Physiol 204 198-209 (Pubitemid 40776823)
70. Harley B A C, Kim H D, Zaman M H, Yannas I V, Lauffenburger D A and Gibson L J 2008 Microarchitecture of three-dimensional scaffolds influences cell migration behavior via junction interactions Biophys. J. 95 4013-24
71. Peyton S R, Ilke Kalcioglu Z, Cohen J C, Runkle A P, Van Vliet K J, Lauffenburger D A and Griffith L G 2011 Marrow-derived stem cell motility in 3d synthetic scaffold is governed by geometry along with adhesivity and stiffness Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108 1181-93
72. Groh A and Louis A K 2010 Stochastic modelling of biased cell migration and collagen matrix modification J. Math. Biol. 61 617-47
73. Roussos E T, Condeelis J S and Patsialou A 2011 Chemotaxis in cancer Nature Rev. Cancer 11 573-87
74. Polacheck W J, Charest J L and Kamm R D 2011 Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 11115-20
75. Wood L B, Das A, Kamm R D and Asada H H 2009 A stochastic broadcast feedback approach to regulating cell population morphology for microfluidic angiogenesis platforms IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56 2299-303
76. Dallon J C, Sherratt J A and Maini P K 1999 Mathematical modelling of extracellular matrix dynamics using discrete cells: fiber orientation and tissue regeneration J. Theor. Biol. 199 449-71 (Pubitemid 29417787)