Matrices of science and technology interactions and patterns of structured growth: Implications for development

Scientometrics

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 55-75

  Ribeiro, Leonardo Costa ^a   Ruiz, Ricardo Machado ^a   Bernardes, Américo Tristão ^b   Albuquerque, Eduardo Motta ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF OURO PRETO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Science and technology linkages; Stages of economic development; Systems of innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952319442     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0020-3     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bassecoulard, E., & Zitt, M. (2004). Patents and publications: The lexical connection. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S& T systems (pp. 665-694). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Bernardes, A. T., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2003). Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: Lessons for less-developed countries. Research Policy, 32(5), 865-885.
3. Bhattacharya, S., & Meyer, M. (2003). Large firms and the science-technology interface: Patent, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films. Scientometrics, 58(2), 265-279.
4. Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Grupp, H. (1996). The weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989-1993 (part I). Scientometrics, 33(3), 263-293.
5. Callaert, J., van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thus, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3-20.
6. Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public R& D on industrial research. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
7. Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R., Rosenberg, N., et al. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48(1), 61-72.
8. Freeman, C. (1994). The economics of technical change: Critical survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, 463-514.
9. Freeman, C. (1995). The "National System of Innovation" in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
10. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economis of industrial innovation. London: Pinter.
11. Guan, J., & He, Y. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72(3), 403-425.
12. Klevorick, A., Levin, R., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1995). On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185-205.
13. Lundvall. (1992). National System of Innovation. London: Pinter Publications.
14. Mazzoleni, R., & Nelson, R. (2007). The roles of research at universities and public labs in economic catch-up. Research Policy, 36(10), 1512-1528.
15. Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. (2005). Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U. S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.
17. Narin, F., & Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 369-381.
18. National Science Board. (2002). Science and engineering indicators 2002 (http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/seind02/).
19. National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators 2004 (http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/seind04/).
20. National Science Board. (2006). Science and engineering indicators 2006 (http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/seind06/).
21. Nelson, R. (1988). Institutions supporting technical change in the United States. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 312-329). London: Pinter.
22. Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques. (2006). Science & technologie: indicateurs 2006. Paris: Economica (http://www. obs-ost. fr/le-savoir-faire/etudes-en-ligne/etudes-2006/rapport-2006. html).
23. Rapini, M. (2007). Interação Universidade-Empresa no Brasil: Evidências do Diretório dos Grupos de Pesquisa do CNPq. Estudos Econômicos, 37(1), 212-233.
24. Ribeiro, L. C., Ruiz, R. M., Albuquerque, E. M., & Bernardes, A. T. (2006a). National systems of innovation and technological differentiation: A multi-country model. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 17(2), 247-257.
25. Ribeiro, L. C., Ruiz, R. M., Bernardes, A. T., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2006b). Science in the developing world: Running twice as fast? Computing in Science and Engineering, 8, 81-87.
26. Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
27. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
28. Schmoch, U. (1997). Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics, 38(1), 103-116.
29. Tijsen, R. (2004). Measuring and evaluating science-technology connections and interactions. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S& T systems (pp. 695-715). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Tijssen, R. J., Buter, R. K., & van Leeuwen, N. (2000). Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389-412.
31. USPTO. Site: http://www. uspto. gov.
32. Verbeek, A., Callaert, J., Andries, P., Ebackere, K., Luwel, M., & Veugelers, R. (2002). Science and technology interplay-A modelling approach on a regional level. Final Report to the EC DG Research, Brussels.
33. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Luwel, M. (2003). Science cited in patents: A geographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents. Scientometrics, 58(2), 241-263.
34. Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecoulard, E., & Laville, F. (2003). Potential science-technology spillovers in regions: An insight on geographic co-location of knowledge activities in the EU. Scientometrics, 57(2), 295-320.