The co-evolution of universities' academic research and knowledge-transfer activities: The case of South Korea

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 493-503

  Kwon, Ki Seok ^a,b  

^a Kyungil University   (South Korea)

^b Korean Women's Development Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; DEVELOPING WORLD; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; HIGHER EDUCATION; INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 80755125672     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234211X12960315267930     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Albuquerque, E M 2001. Scientific infrastructure and catching-up process: notes about a relationship illustrated by science and technology statistics. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 55(4), 545-566.
2. Altbach, P G 1989. Higher education and scientific development: the promise of newly industrializing countries. In Scientific Development and Higher Education, eds P G Altbach et al., pp. 3-29. New York: Praeger.
3. Altbach, P G 2004. The past and future of Asian universities: twenty-first century challenges. In Asian Universities: Historical Perspective and Contemporary Challenges, eds P G Altbach and T Umakoshi. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Amsden, A H 1989. Asia's Next Giant. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Anprotec 2007. Anprotec 20 anos: aventura do possoível. Brasília: Associação Nacional de Entidades Promotoras de Empreendimentos Inovadores (ANPROTEC).
6. Balaguer, A et al. 2004. Technological Specialization in Small and Open Economies, STIC Eurocores Working Paper Series, Taipei: STIC-NSC.
7. Ben-David, J 1984. The Scientist's Role in Society: a Comparative Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Bernardes, A T and EMAlbuquerque 2003. Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries. Research Policy, 32, 865-885.
9. Bok, D 2003. Universities in the Market Place: the Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. Braun, T, W Glanzel and H Grupp 1995. The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989-1993, Part I. Scientometrics, 33, 263-293.
11. Charle, C and J Verger 1989. Histoire des Universités. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
12. Dagnino, R and L Velho 1998. University-industry-government relations on the periphery: the University of Campinas, Brazil. Minerva, 36, 229-251.
13. David, P A 2002. The economic logic of 'open science' and the balance between private property rights and the public domain in scientific data and information: a primer. National Research Council Symposium on the Role of the Public Domain in Scientific and Technical Data and Information National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
14. Eom, B and K Lee 2010. Determinants of industry-academy linkages and their impact on firm performance: the case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization. Research Policy, 39, 625-639.
15. Etzkowitz, H 2008. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government. New York and London: Routledge.
16. Etzkowitz, H and L Leydesdorff eds 1997. Universities in the Global Economy: a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Cassell Academic.
17. Etzkowitz, H, A Webster, C Gebhardt and B R C Terra 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
18. Etzkowitz, H, J M C De Mello and M Almeida 2005. Towards 'meta-innovation' in Brazil: the evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34, 411-424.
19. Freeman, C 1987. Technology, Policy, and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London and New York: Pinter.
20. Geuna, A 1999. The Economics of Knowledge Production: Funding and the Structure of University Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
21. Gibbons, M, CLimoges, H Nowotny, S Schwartzman, P Scott andM Trow 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London:Sage.
22. Guston, D H and K Keniston 1994. The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Hershberg, E, K Nabeshima and S Yusuf 2007. Opening the ivory tower to business: university-industry linkages and the development of knowledge-intensive clusters in Asian cities. World Development, 35(6), 931-940.
24. Kim, Linsu 1997. Imitation to Innovation: the Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Harvard Business School Press.
25. Kim, Linsu 2000. Korea's national innovation system in transition. In Technology, Learning, and Innovation, eds L Kim and R R Nelson, pp. 335-360. Cambridge University Press.
26. Kim, Linsu and Gihong Yi 1997. The dynamics of R&D in industrial development: lessons from the Korean experience. Industry and Innovation, 4(2), 218-233.
27. KIPO 2007. The Patent Trends in Korea 2007. KIPO.
28. KRF, Korea Research Foundation 2008. The achievement of the Brain Korea 21 programme, the website of KRF: , last accessed 25 April 2008.
29. Kwon, K-S 2009. Emergence of Research and Entrepreneurial Activities of Korean Universities. Paper presented at the conference on University-Industry Linkages and Economic Performance, College of Social Sciences, Seoul National University, 27 February 2009.
30. Lall, S 2000. Technological change and industrialization in the Asian newly industrializing economies: achievements and challenges. In Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies, eds L Kim and R R Nelson. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
31. Lattimore, R and J Revesz 1996. Australian Science: Performance from Published Papers, Bureau of Industry Economics. Report 96r3, Australian Government Printing Office.
32. Lee, J S 2009. Korea's science and technology policy. Paper presented at the AAAS Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
33. Lee, H, K Choi, J Yoon and G Kim 1998. A Study on the History of Modern Education after Liberation from Japanese Rule. Korean Educational Development Institute.
34. Lundvall, B-Å ed. 1992. National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter.
35. Martin, B R 2003. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for funding and Governance, eds Aldo Geuna, Ammon J Salter and W Edward Steinmueler. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
36. Martin, B R and H Etzkowitz 2001. The origin and evolution of the university species. Journal for Science and Technology Studies (VEST), 13(3/4), 9-34.
37. Mazzoleni, R 2003. The role of universities and public research in the catching-up process. Globelics.
38. Mazzoleni, R and R R Nelson 2007. Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy, 36, 1512-1528.
39. Merton, R 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press.
40. MEST, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology 2008. National Project towards Building World Class Universities 2008-2012. Korean MEST.
41. Mowery, D C and B N Sampat 2005. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry-technology transfer: a model for other OECD government? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1/2), 115-127.
42. Nelson, R R 2004. The market economy and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471.
43. Nelson, R R ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Okimoto, D I and G R Saxonhouse 1987. Technology and the future of economy. In The Political Economy of Japan, Vol. 1 The Domestic Transformation, eds K Yamamura and Y Yasuba. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
45. Pack, H 2000. Research and development in the industrial development process. In Technology, Learning, and Innovation, eds L Kim and R R Nelson, pp. 69-94. Cambridge University Press.
46. Pavitt, K 1998. The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy, 27, 793-805.
47. Pavitt, K 2001. Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice (and what they should not learn?)? Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 761-779.
48. Seung, J and W Kim 2010. Post catch-up innovation and development of creative talent in Korea: limitations and challenges. STI Policy Review, 1(3), 39-51.
49. Shin, Jang-Sup 1996. The Economics of the Latecomers: Catching-Up, Technology Transfer and Institutions in Germany, Japan and South Korea. London: Routledge.
50. Slaughter, S and G Rhoades 1996. The emergence of a competitiveness R&D policy coalition and the commercialisation of academic science and technology, science. Technology and Human Values, 21(3), 303-339.
51. Song, W and H-R Hwang 2006. The technological innovation patterns of component suppliers in the post catching-up period: the case study of component suppliers in mobile phone industry. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 9(3), 435-450.
52. Sutz, J 2000. The university-industry-government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 29, 279-290.
53. Tan, J 2004. Singapore: small nation, big plans. In Asian Universities: Historical Perspective and Contemporary Challenges, eds P G Altbach and T Umakoshi. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54. Van Looy, B, J Callaert and K Debackere 2006. Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596-608.
55. Wong, P-K, Y-P Ho and A Singh 2007. Towards an 'entrepreneurial university' model to support knowledge-based economic development: the case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941-958.
56. Yun, M and K Ahn 2002. The characteristics of structure and level of science activity in Korea: an analysis by SCI. STEPI policy report, Science and Technology Policy Institute.