Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?

Scientometrics

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 361-377

  Schmoch, Ulrich ^a   Schubert, Torben ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43149096891     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1818-5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. J. D. Adams C. G. Black J. R. Clemmons P. Stephan 2005 Scientific teams and institutional collaboration: Evidence from U.S. universities 1981–1999 Research Policy 34 259 285 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.014 Adams, J. D., Black, C. G., Clemmons, J. R., Stephan, P. (2005), Scientific teams and institutional collaboration: Evidence from U.S. universities 1981–1999, Research Policy, 34: 259–285.
2. D. Aksnes R. Taxt 2004 Peer review and bibliometric indicators: A comparative study at a Norwegian university Research Evaluation 13 1 33 41 10.3152/147154404781776563 Aksnes, D., Taxt, R. (2004), Peer review and bibliometric indicators: A comparative study at a Norwegian university, Research Evaluation, 13(1): 33–41.
3. P. Bourdieu 2004 Science of Science and Reflexivity The University of Chicago Press Chicago Bourdieu, P. (2004), Science of Science and Reflexivity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. B. Bozeman S. Lee 2005 The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity Social Science Studies 35 5 673 702 10.1177/0306312705052359 Bozeman, B., Lee, S. (2005), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Science Studies, 35(5): 673–702.
5. J. R. Cole S. Cole 1971 Measuring the quality of sociological research: problems in the use of the Science Citation Index The American Sociologist 6 23 29 Cole, J. R., Cole, S. (1971), Measuring the quality of sociological research: problems in the use of the Science Citation Index, The American Sociologist, 6(23): 29.
6. Cole, S. (1989), Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, p. 9 ff.
7. S. Cozzens 1989 What do citations count? The rhetorical-first model Scientometrics 15 437 447 10.1007/BF02017064 Cozzens, S. (1989), What do citations count? The rhetorical-first model, Scientometrics, 15: 437–447.
8. H.-D. Daniel 2001 Wissenschaftsevaluation Center for Science and Technology Studies, CEST Bern Daniel, H.-D. (2001), Wissenschaftsevaluation. Center for Science and Technology Studies, CEST, Bern.
9. D. Deb. Beaver R. Rosen 1978 Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The Professional origins of scientific co-authorship Scientometrics 1 65 84 10.1007/BF02016840 Deb. Beaver, D., Rosen, R. (1978), Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The Professional origins of scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, 1: 65–84.
10. D. Deb. Beaver 2001 Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future Scientiometrics 52 3 365 377 10.1023/A:1014254214337 Deb. Beaver D. (2001), Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future, Scientiometrics, 52(3): 365–377.
11. G. Gilbert 1977 Referencing as persuasion Social Science Studies 17 113 122 10.1177/030631277700700112 Gilbert, G. (1977), Referencing as persuasion, Social Science Studies, 17: 113–122.
12. W. Glänzel 2001 National characteristics in international and scientific co-authorship relations Scientometrics 51 1 69 115 10.1023/A:1010512628145 Glänzel, W. (2001), National characteristics in international and scientific co-authorship relations, Scientometrics, 51(1): 69–115.
13. W. Glänzel C. Lange De 2002 A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration Scientometrics 54 75 89 10.1023/A:1015684505035 Glänzel, W., De Lange, C. (2002), A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration, Scientometrics, 54: 75–89.
14. W. Glänzel A. Schubert 2001 Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry Scientometrics 50 2 199 214 10.1023/A:1010561321723 Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2001), Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry, Scientometrics, 50(2): 199–214.
15. W. Glänzel A. Schubert 2004 Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 257 276 Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2004), Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 257–276.
16. F. Hayashi 2000 Econometrics Princeton University Press New York 0994.62107 Hayashi, F. (2000), Econometrics. Princeton University Press, New York.
17. Jäger, M. (2006), Leistungsorientierte Budgetierung: Analyse der Umsetzung an ausgewählten Universitäten und Fakultäten/Fachbereichen, Hochschulinformationsystem A1/2006.
18. D. Jansen A. Wald K. Franke U. Schmoch T. Schubert 2007 Third party research funding and performance in research. On the effects of institutional conditions on research performance of teams Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 59 125 149 10.1007/s11577-007-0006-1 Jansen, D., Wald, A., Franke, K., Schmoch, U., Schubert, T. (2007), Third party research funding and performance in research. On the effects of institutional conditions on research performance of teams, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 59: 125–149.
19. J. S. Katz B. R. Martin 1997 What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26 1 18 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1 Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1–18.
20. J. Korevaar H. Moed 1996 Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics Scientometrics 37 1 117 130 10.1007/BF02093488 Korevaar, J., Moed, H. (1996), Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics, Scientometrics, 37(1): 117–130.
21. C.-E. Kruytbosch 1989 The role and effectiveness of peer review D. Evered S. Harnett The evaluation of Scientific Research Wiley Chichester UK 69 85 Kruytbosch, C.-E. (1989), The role and effectiveness of peer review. In: David Evered and Sara Harnett (Eds), The evaluation of Scientific Research. Chichester UK, Wiley, pp. 69–85.
22. B. Latour S. Woolgar 1979 Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts Sage Publishing Los Angeles Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publishing, Los Angeles.
23. G. Laudel 2002 What do we measure by co-authorship Research Evaluation 11 3 15 10.3152/147154402781776961 Laudel, G. (2002), What do we measure by co-authorship, Research Evaluation, 11: 3–15.
24. B. Latour S. Wolgar 1979 Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts Sage Publishing Los Angeles Latour, B., Wolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publishing, Los Angeles.
25. R. Merton 1979 Foreword E. Garfield Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, vii-xi John Wiley and Sons New York Merton, R. (1979), Foreword. In: E. Garfield (Ed.), Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, vii-xi. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
26. H. F. Moed 2005 Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation Information Science and Knowledge Managemen., Springer Dordrecht Moed, H. F. (2005), Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation, Information Science and Knowledge Managemen., Springer, Dordrecht.
27. A.-J. Nederhoff 1988 The validity and reliability of evaluation of scholarly performance A. F. J. Raan Van Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology Elsevier Amsterdam 193 228 Nederhoff, A.-J. (1988), The validity and reliability of evaluation of scholarly performance. In: Van Raan, A. F. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 193–228.
28. E. Rinia T. Leeuwen Van H. Vuren Van A. Raan Van 1998 Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands Research Policy 27 95 107 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00026-2 Rinia. E., Van Leeuwen, T., Van Vuren, H., Van Raan, A. (1998), Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands, Research Policy, 27: 95–107.
29. P.-M. Roeder J. Baumert J. Naumann L. Trommer 1988 Institutionelle Bedingungen wissenschaftlicher Produktivität H.-D. Daniel R. Fisch Evaluation von Forschung Universitäts-Verlag Konstanz 457 494 Roeder, P.-M., Baumert, J., Naumann, J., Trommer, L. (1988), Institutionelle Bedingungen wissenschaftlicher Produktivität. In: DANIEL, H.-D., FISCH, R. (Eds), Evaluation von Forschung. Universitäts-Verlag, Konstanz, pp. 457–494.
30. Schmoch, U. (2005), Leistungsfähigkeit und Strukturen der Wissenschaft im Internationalen Vergleich 2004, Bericht zur Technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit, Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 6-2005, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
31. G. D. L. Travis H. M. Collins 1991 New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system Science, Technology, & Human Values 16 322 342 10.1177/016224399101600303 Travis, G. D. L., Collins, H. M. (1991), New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16: 322–342.
32. Weingart, P. (2003), Wissenschaftssoziologie, Themen der Soziologie. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld.
33. P. Weingart 2005 Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics 62 117 131 10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7 Weingart, P. (2005), Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, 62: 117–131.
34. J. M. Wooldridge 2002 Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, Massachusetts The MIT Press London Wooldridge, J. M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, Massachusetts. The MIT Press, London.
35. P. Woulters 1997 Citation cycles and peer review cyles Scientometrics 38 1 39 55 10.1007/BF02461122 Woulters, P. (1997), Citation cycles and peer review cyles, Scientometrics, 38(1): 39–55.