Efficient agents for cliff-edge environments with a large set of decision options

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 697-704

  Katz, Ron ^a   Kraus, Sarit ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Opponent modeling; Reinforcement learning; Sealed bid auctions; Ultimatum game

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DECISION MAKING; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CLIFF EDGE (CE) ENVIRONMENTS; OPPONENT MODELING; SEALED BID AUCTIONS; ULTIMATUM GAMES;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 34247273043     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1160633.1160759     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. P. Bourgine and B. Leloup. May learning explain the ultimatum game paradox? Technical Report GRID Working Paper No. 00-03, Ecole Polytechnique, 2000.
2. T. Brenner and N. Vriend. On the behavior of proposers in ultimatum games. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. Forthcoming.
3. A. Byde, C. Preist, and N. Jennings. Decision procedures for multiple auctions. In AAMAS, pages 613-620, 2002.
4. J. DiMicco, A. Greenwald, and P. Maes. Dynamic pricing strategies under a finite time horizon. In EC'01, 2001.
5. S. Fatima, M. Wooldridge, and N. Jennings. Sequential auctions for objects with common and private values. In AAMAS, pages 635-642, 2005.
6. Y. Gal, A. Pfeffer, F. Marzo, and B. Grosz. Learning social preferences in games. In AAAI, pages 226-231, 2004.
7. J. Gittins. Multiarmed Bandits Allocation Indices. Wiley, New York, 1989.
8. B. Grosskopf. Reinforcement and directional learning in the ultimatum game with responder competition. Experimental Economics, 6(2):141-158, 2003.
9. W. Guth and S. Huck. From ultimatum bargaining to dictatorship - an experimental study of four games varying in veto power. Metroeconomica, 48(3):262-279, 1997.
10. V. Krishna and J. Morgan. An analysis of the war of attrition and the all-pay auction. J. Econ. Theory, 72:343-362, 1997.
11. B. Leloup and L. Deveaux. Dynamic pricing on the internet: Theory and simulations. JECR, 1(3):265-276, 2001.
12. L. Niklasson, H. Engstrom, and U. Johansson. An adaptive rock, scissors and paper player based on a tapped delay neural network. In ADCOG21, pages 130-136, 2001.
13. A. Roth and I. Erev. Learning in extensive form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econ. Behav., 8:164-212, 1995.
14. R. Sutton and A. Barto. An Introduction to Reinforcement Learning. MIT Press, 1998.
15. P. Todd and B. Borges. Designing socially intelligent agents for the ultimatum game. In K. Dautenhahn, editor, Socially intelligent agents-Papers from the 1997 Fall Symposium, pages 134-136. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1997.
16. N. Vreind. Will reasoning improve learning? Econ. Lett., 55(1):9-18, 1997.
17. F. Zhong, D. Wu, and S. Kimbrough. Cooperative agent systems: Artificial agents play the ultimatum game. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 11(6):433-447, 2002.