SERAPhiC: A benchmark for in silico fragment-based drug design

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2882-2896

  Favia, Angelo D ^a   Bottegoni, Giovanni ^a   Nobeli, Irene ^b   Bisignano, Paola ^a   Cavalli, Andrea ^a,c  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEINS; SOFTWARE TESTING;

DOCKING PROCEDURES; DRUG DESIGN; ENERGY MINIMA; HIGH QUALITY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN FRAGMENTS; SCORING FUNCTIONS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; FACTUAL DATABASE; FUNGUS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DRUG DISCOVERY; FUNGI; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 82355168413     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci2003363     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Shuker, S. B.; Hajduk, P. J.; Meadows, R. P.; Fesik, S. W. Discovering high-affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR Science 1996, 274, 1531-4 (Pubitemid 26403929)
2. Warr, W. A., Fragment-based drug discovery. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2009.
3. Retra, K.; Irth, H.; van Muijlwijk-Koezen, J. E. Surface Plasmon Resonance biosensor analysis as a useful tool in FBDD Drug Discovery Today: Technol. 2010, 7, e181-e187
4. Dalvit, C. NMR methods in fragment screening: theory and a comparison with other biophysical techniques Drug Discovery Today 2009, 14, 1051-7
5. Chessari, G.; Woodhead, A. J. From fragment to clinical candidate - a historical perspective Drug Discovery Today 2009, 14, 668-75
6. Turnbull, W. B.; Daranas, A. H. On the value of c: can low affinity systems be studied by isothermal titration calorimetry? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14859-66 (Pubitemid 37475576)
7. Hartshorn, M. J.; Murray, C. W.; Cleasby, A.; Frederickson, M.; Tickle, I. J.; Jhoti, H. Fragment-based lead discovery using X-ray crystallography J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 403-13 (Pubitemid 40139783)
8. Jorgensen, W. L. The many roles of computation in drug discovery Science 2004, 303, 1813-8 (Pubitemid 38374866)
9. Chen, Y.; Shoichet, B. K. Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment-based inhibitor discovery Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 358-64
10. Dymock, B. W.; Barril, X.; Brough, P. A.; Cansfield, J. E.; Massey, A.; McDonald, E.; Hubbard, R. E.; Surgenor, A.; Roughley, S. D.; Webb, P.; Workman, P.; Wright, L.; Drysdale, M. J. Novel, potent small-molecule inhibitors of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 discovered through structure-based design J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4212-5 (Pubitemid 40884922)
11. Teotico, D. G.; Babaoglu, K.; Rocklin, G. J.; Ferreira, R. S.; Giannetti, A. M.; Shoichet, B. K. Docking for fragment inhibitors of AmpC beta-lactamase Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 7455-60
12. Warner, S. L.; Bashyam, S.; Vankayalapati, H.; Bearss, D. J.; Han, H.; Mahadevan, D.; Von Hoff, D. D.; Hurley, L. H. Identification of a lead small-molecule inhibitor of the Aurora kinases using a structure-assisted, fragment-based approach Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 1764-73 (Pubitemid 44323244)
13. Marcou, G.; Rognan, D. Optimizing fragment and scaffold docking by use of molecular interaction fingerprints J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 195-207 (Pubitemid 46237537)
14. Whittaker, M.; Law, R. J.; Ichihara, O.; Hesterkamp, T.; Hallett, D. Fragments: past, present and future Drug Discovery Today: Technol. 2010, 7, e163-e171
15. Sandor, M.; Kiss, R.; Keseru, G. M. Virtual fragment docking by Glide: a validation study on 190 protein-fragment complexes J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1165-72
16. Kawatkar, S.; Wang, H.; Czerminski, R.; Joseph-McCarthy, D. Virtual fragment screening: an exploration of various docking and scoring protocols for fragments using Glide J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2009, 23, 527-539
17. Favia, A. D.; Nobeli, I. Using chemical structure to infer biological function. In Computational Approaches in Cheminformatics and Bioinformatics; Bender, A.; Rajarshi, G., Eds.; Wiley: New York, in press.
18. Friedman, R.; Caflisch, A. Discovery of plasmepsin inhibitors by fragment-based docking and consensus scoring ChemMedChem 2009, 4, 1317-26
19. Gleeson, M. P.; Gleeson, D. QM/MM as a tool in fragment based drug discovery. A cross-docking, rescoring study of kinase inhibitors J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1437-48
20. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-48 (Pubitemid 27170693)
21. Chen, Y.; Pohlhaus, D. T. In silico docking and scoring of fragments Drug Discovery Today: Technol. 2010, 7, e149-e156
22. Berman, H.; Henrick, K.; Nakamura, H. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 980 (Pubitemid 37500485)
23. Orengo, C. A.; Pearl, F. M.; Thornton, J. M. The CATH domain structure database Methods Biochem. Anal. 2003, 44, 249-71
24. Hartshorn, M. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Brewerton, S. C.; Mooij, W. T.; Mortenson, P. N.; Murray, C. W. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 726-41 (Pubitemid 46332985)
25. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J. D. The impact of structural genomics on the protein data bank Am. J. Pharmacogenomics 2004, 4, 247-52 (Pubitemid 39145472)
26. Allen, K. N.; Bellamacina, C. R.; Ding, X.; Jeffery, C. J.; Mattos, C.; Petsko, G. A.; Ringe, D. An Experimental Approach to Mapping the Binding Surfaces of Crystalline Proteins J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 2605-2611 (Pubitemid 126793213)
27. Babaoglu, K.; Shoichet, B. K. Deconstructing fragment-based inhibitor discovery Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 720-723 (Pubitemid 44764214)
28. Bottegoni, G.; Kufareva, I.; Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. A new method for ligand docking to flexible receptors by dual alanine scanning and refinement (SCARE) J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 311-25
29. Hawkins, P. C.; Warren, G. L.; Skillman, A. G.; Nicholls, A. How to do an evaluation: pitfalls and traps J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 179-90
30. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2977-80 (Pubitemid 38702694)
31. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Yang, C. Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4111-9 (Pubitemid 40800619)
32. Wimmerova, M.; Mitchell, E.; Sanchez, J. F.; Gautier, C.; Imberty, A. Crystal structure of fungal lectin: six-bladed beta-propeller fold and novel fucose recognition mode for Aleuria aurantia lectin J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 27059-67 (Pubitemid 36876860)
33. Vogt, J.; Perozzo, R.; Pautsch, A.; Prota, A.; Schelling, P.; Pilger, B.; Folkers, G.; Scapozza, L.; Schulz, G. E. Nucleoside binding site of herpes simplex type 1 thymidine kinase analyzed by X-ray crystallography Proteins 2000, 41, 545-53
34. Bernacki, K.; Kalyanaraman, C.; Jacobson, M. P. Virtual ligand screening against Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: improving docking enrichment using physics-based methods J. Biomol. Screen. 2005, 10, 675-81 (Pubitemid 41476801)
35. Favia, A. D.; Nobeli, I.; Glaser, F.; Thornton, J. M. Molecular docking for substrate identification: the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 375, 855-74
36. Hermann, J. C.; Ghanem, E.; Li, Y.; Raushel, F. M.; Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. Predicting substrates by docking high-energy intermediates to enzyme structures J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15882-91 (Pubitemid 44894131)
37. Hermann, J. C.; Marti-Arbona, R.; Fedorov, A. A.; Fedorov, E.; Almo, S. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Raushel, F. M. Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function Nature 2007, 448, 775-9 (Pubitemid 47266333)
38. Kalyanaraman, C.; Bernacki, K.; Jacobson, M. P. Virtual screening against highly charged active sites: identifying substrates of alpha-beta barrel enzymes Biochemistry 2005, 44, 2059-71 (Pubitemid 40223633)
39. Macchiarulo, A.; Nobeli, I.; Thornton, J. M. Ligand selectivity and competition between enzymes in silico Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 1039-45 (Pubitemid 39014486)
40. Knox, C.; Law, V.; Jewison, T.; Liu, P.; Ly, S.; Frolkis, A.; Pon, A.; Banco, K.; Mak, C.; Neveu, V.; Djoumbou, Y.; Eisner, R.; Guo, A. C.; Wishart, D. S. DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugs Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D1035-41
41. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Hirakawa, M. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D355-60
42. Gasteiger, J. Of molecules and humans J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6429-34 (Pubitemid 44657437)
43. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Irwin, J. J. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6789-801 (Pubitemid 44749746)
44. Durrant, J. D.; McCammon, J. A. BINANA: A novel algorithm for ligand-binding characterization J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2011, 29, 888-93
45. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Protein-Ligand docking as an energy optimization problem. In Drug-receptor thermodynamics: introduction and applications; Raffa, R. B., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, New York, 2001; pp 603-624.
46. Cole, J. C.; Murray, C. W.; Nissink, J. W.; Taylor, R. D.; Taylor, R. Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult Proteins 2005, 60, 325-32 (Pubitemid 41061629)
47. Verdonk, M. L.; Giangreco, I.; Hall, R. J.; Korb, O.; Mortenson, P. N.; Murray, C. W. Docking performance of fragments and druglike compounds J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 5422-31
48. Deng, Z.; Chuaqui, C.; Singh, J. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 337-44 (Pubitemid 38057878)
49. Brewerton, S. C. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2008, 11, 356-64 (Pubitemid 351572445)
50. Morphy, R.; Rankovic, Z. Fragments, network biology and designing multiple ligands Drug Discovery Today 2007, 12, 156-60 (Pubitemid 46176667)
51. Hann, M. M.; Leach, A. R.; Harper, G. Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 856-64
52. Hopkins, A. L.; Groom, C. R.; Alex, A. Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection Drug Discovery Today 2004, 9, 430-1 (Pubitemid 38510559)
53. Velankar, S.; Alhroub, Y.; Alili, A.; Best, C.; Boutselakis, H. C.; Caboche, S.; Conroy, M. J.; Dana, J. M.; van Ginkel, G.; Golovin, A.; Gore, S. P.; Gutmanas, A.; Haslam, P.; Hirshberg, M.; John, M.; Lagerstedt, I.; Mir, S.; Newman, L. E.; Oldfield, T. J.; Penkett, C. J.; Pineda-Castillo, J.; Rinaldi, L.; Sahni, G.; Sawka, G.; Sen, S.; Slowley, R.; Sousa da Silva, A. W.; Suarez-Uruena, A.; Swaminathan, G. J.; Symmons, M. F.; Vranken, W. F.; Wainwright, M.; Kleywegt, G. J. PDBe: Protein Data Bank in Europe Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D402-10
54. Kleywegt, G. J.; Harris, M. R.; Zou, J. Y.; Taylor, T. C.; Wahlby, A.; Jones, T. A. The Uppsala Electron-Density Server Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 2004, 60, 2240-9 (Pubitemid 41742776)
55. Nemethy, G.; Gibson, K. D.; Palmer, K. A.; Yoon, C. N.; Paterlini, G.; Zagari, A.; Rumsey, S.; Scheraga, H. A. Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 6472-6484
56. Halgren, T. A. Merck molecular force field. I -V J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 490-641
57. QikProp, version 3.3; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, 2010.
58. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. The contour-buildup algorithm to calculate the analytical molecular surface J. Struct. Biol. 1996, 116, 138-43 (Pubitemid 26093135)
59. An, J.; Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 752-61 (Pubitemid 40873004)
60. Abagyan, R.; Frishman, D.; Argos, P. Recognition of distantly related proteins through energy calculations Proteins 1994, 19, 132-40 (Pubitemid 24188422)
61. Abagyan, R.; Totrov, M. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 983-1002 (Pubitemid 24047836)
62. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Derivation of sensitive discrimination potential for virtual screening, RECOMB '99. Proceedings of the Third Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, Lyon, France; ACM Press: New York, 1999; pp 37-38.
63. Bottegoni, G.; Kufareva, I.; Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 397-406
64. Abagyan, R.; Kufareva, I. The flexible pocketome engine for structural chemogenomics Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 575, 249-79
65. Abagyan, R.; Orry, A.; Raush, E.; Totrov, M. ICM Manual 3.7; Molsoft LCC: La Jolla, CA, 2010.
66. Maestro, version 9.1; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, 2010.
67. Schrödinger Suite 2010 Protein Preparation Wizard, Epik, version 2.1; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, 2010. Impact, version 5.6; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, 2010. Prime, version 2.2; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, 2010.
68. Sanner, M. F. Python: a programming language for software integration and development J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1999, 17, 57-61 (Pubitemid 30029318)
69. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14 (33-8) 27-8