Direct Push technologies-an efficient investigation method for subsurface characterization;Direct-Push-Technologien - Effiziente Untersuchungsmethoden für die Untergrunderkundung

Grundwasser

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 221-234

  Leven, Carsten ^a   Weiß, Hansjörg ^b   Vienken, Thomas ^c   Dietrich, Peter ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Imw Innovative Messtechnik Dr Weiß ^*  (Germany)

^c HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Direct Push; Direct sensing; Sampling; Site characterization; Subsurface investigation

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY; FIELD SURVEY; SAMPLING; SENSOR; SITE INVESTIGATION; SURFACE STRUCTURE;

GERMANY;

EID: 81855207540     PISSN: 1430483X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00767-011-0175-8     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Aboumatar, H., Goble, G. G.: SPT dynamic analysis and measurements. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123(10), 921-928 (1997).
2. Akca, N.: Correlation of SPT-CPT data from the United Arab Emirates. Eng. Geol. 67(3-4), 219-231 (2003).
3. Anastasiadis, P., Xefteris, A., Latinopoulos, P.: Monitoring a contaminant unconfined aquifer with a multilevel sampler. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 12(10), 1158-1166 (2003).
4. Anderson, N., Thitimakorn, T., Ismail, A., Hoffman, D.: A comparison of four geophysical methods for determining the shear wave velocity of soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13(1), 11-23 (2007).
5. Ardalan, H., Eslami, A., Nariman-Zadeh, N.: Piles shaft capacity from Cpt and Cptu data by polynomial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Comput. Geotech. 36(4), 616-625 (2009).
6. Asten, M. W., Stephenson, W. R., Davenport, P. N.: Shear-wave velocity profile for holocene sediments measured from microtremor array studies. Scpt, and seismic refraction. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 10(3), 235-242 (2005).
7. Baermann, A., Bahrig, B., Bücherl, K., Klaas, N.: ITVA-Vergleichsprobennahme - ein Ringversuch für Rammkernsondierungen. Altlasten-Spektrum 2, 65-69 (2005).
8. Banikowski, J. E., Kaczmar, S. W., Hunt, J. F.: Field validation of helium as a tracer gas during soil vapor sample collection. Soil Sediment Contam. 18(3), 243-263 (2009).
9. Beck, F. P., Clark, P. J., Puls, R. W.: Location and characterization of subsurface anomalies using a soil conductivity probe. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 20(2), 55-59 (2000).
10. Borden, R. C.: Effective distribution of emulsified edible oil for enhanced anaerobic bioremediation. J. Contam. Hydrol. 94(1-2), 1-12 (2007).
11. Bray, J. D., Sancio, R. B., Durgunoglu, T., Onalp, A., Youd, T. L., Stewart, J. P., Seed, R. B., Cetin, O. K., Bol, E., Baturay, M. B., Christensen, C., Karadayilar, T.: Subsurface characterization at ground failure sites in Adapazari, Turkey. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130(7), 673-685 (2004).
12. Breul, P., Gourves, R.: In field soil characterization: approach based on texture image analysis. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(1), 102-107 (2006).
13. Bronders, J., van Keer, I., Touchant, K., Vanermen, G., Wilczek, D.: Application of the membrane interphase probe (Mip): an evaluation. J. Soils Sediments 9(1), 74-82 (2009).
14. Butler, J. J.: The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1997).
15. Butler, J. J., Healey, J. M., McCall, G. W., Garnett, E. J., Loheide, S. P.: Hydraulic tests with direct-push equipment. Ground Water 40(1), 25-36 (2002).
16. Butler, J. J., Dietrich, P., Wittig, V., Christy, T.: Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter. Ground Water 45(4), 409-419 (2007).
17. Campanella, R. G., Weemees, I.: Development and use of an electrical-resistivity cone for groundwater contamination studies. Can. Geotech. J. 27(5), 557-567 (1990).
18. Cetin, K. O., Ozan, C.: Cpt-based probabilistic soil characterization and classification. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135(1), 84-107 (2009).
19. Charette, M. A., Allen, M. C.: Precision ground water sampling in coastal aquifers using a direct-push, shielded-screen well-point system. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 26(2), 87-93 (2006).
20. Chen, X. H.: Hydrologic connections of a stream-aquifer-vegetation zone in south-central platte river Valley, Nebraska. J. Hydrol. 333(2-4), 554-568 (2007).
21. Chen, X. H., Burbach, M., Cheng, C.: Electrical and hydraulic vertical variability in channel sediments and its effects on streamflow depletion due to groundwater extraction. J. Hydrol. 352(3-4), 250-266 (2008).
22. Chiang, C. Y., Loos, K. R., Klopp, R. A.: Field determination of geological chemical-properties of an aquifer by cone penetrometry and headspace analysis. Ground Water 30(3), 428-436 (1992).
23. Cho, J. S., Wilson, J. T., Beck, F. P.: Measuring vertical profiles of hydraulic conductivity with in situ direct-push methods. J. Environ. Eng. 126(8), 775-777 (2000).
24. Conant, B., Cherry, J. A., Gillham, R. W.: A PCE groundwater plume discharging to a river: influence of the streambed and near-river zone on contaminant distributions. J. Contam. Hydrol. 73(1-4), 249-279 (2004).
25. Costanza, J., Davis, W. M.: Rapid detection of volatile organic compounds in the subsurface by membrane introduction into a direct sampling ion-trap mass spectrometer. Field Anal. Chem. Technol. 4(5), 246-254 (2000).
26. D'Affonseca, F. M., Blum, P., Finkel, M., Melzer, R., Grathwohl, P.: Field scale characterization and modeling of contaminant release from a coal tar source zone. J. Contam. Hydrol. 102(1-2), 120-139 (2008).
27. Davis, W. M., Cespedes, E. R., Lee, L. T., Powell, J. F., Goodson, R. A.: Rapid delineation of subsurface petroleum contamination using the site characterization and analysis penetrometer system. Environ. Geol. 29(3-4), 228-237 (1997).
28. Davis, W. M., Wise, M. B., Furey, J. S., Thompson, C. V.: Rapid detection of volatile organic compounds in groundwater by in situ purge and direct-sampling ion-trap mass spectrometry. Field Anal. Chem. Technol. 2(2), 89-96 (1998).
29. Dehnert, J., Leven, C., Trabitzsch, R., Weiss, H.: Determination of high-resolution concentration profiles of nitrate in groundwater by means of direct push soundings. Grundwasser 15(4), 221-230 (2010).
30. DeJong, J. T., Frost, J. D., Cargill, P. E.: Effect of surface texturing on cpt friction sleeve measurements. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127(2), 158-168 (2001).
31. Diem, S., Vogt, T., Hoehn, E.: Spatial characterization of hydraulic conductivity in alluvial gravel-and-sand aquifers: a comparison of methods. Grundwasser 15(4), 241-251 (2010).
32. Dietrich, P., Leven, C.: Direct Push-Technologies. Groundwater Geophysics. A Tool for Hydrogeology, pp. 321-340. Springer, Berlin (2006).
33. Dietrich, P., Butler, J. J., Faiss, K.: A rapid method for hydraulic profiling in unconsolidated formations. Ground Water 46(2), 323-328 (2008).
34. Deutsches Institut für Normung: DIN4021 - Aufschluss durch Schürfe und Bohrungen sowie Entnahme von Proben (1990).
35. Deutsches Institut für Normung: DIN22476-2 - Geotechnische Erkundung und Untersuchung - Felduntersuchungen - Teil 2: Rammsondierungen (ISO 22476-2: 2005); Deutsche Fassung En Iso 22476-2: 2005 (2005).
36. Deutsches Institut für Normung: DIN22476-1 - Geotechnische Erkundung und Untersuchung - Felduntersuchungen - Teil 1: Drucksondierungen mit elektrischen Messwertaufnehmern und Messeinrichtungen für den Porenwasserdruck (Iso/Dis 22476-1: 2009); Deutsche Fassung (2009).
37. Douglas, B. J., Olsen, R. S.: Soil Classification Using Electric Cone Penetrometer. Cone Penetration and Experience (ASCE National Convention), pp. 209-227. American Society of Engineers (ASCE), St. Louis (1981).
38. Edelman, S. H., Holguin, A. R.: Cone penetrometer testing for characterization and sampling of soil and groundwater. Sampling Environ. Media 1282, 192-206 (1996).
39. Edge, R. W., Cordry, K.: The hydropunch-an insitu sampling tool for collecting ground-water from unconsolidated sediments. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 9(3), 177-183 (1989).
40. Einarson, M. D., Cherry, J. A.: A new multilevel ground water monitoring system using multichannel tubing. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 22(4), 52-65 (2002).
41. Elgun, S. N., van Isselt, C. A. H. M., Jansch, R.: Safely uncovering deep foundations and services with magnetometer cone. In: 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. Huntington Beach, California, USA, International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paper No. 1-02 (2010).
42. Ellis, D. V., Schweitzer, J. S., Ullo, J. J.: Nuclear techniques for subsurface geology. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 213-241 (1987).
43. Elsworth, D., Lee, D. S.: Permeability determination from on-the-fly piezocone sounding. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131(5), 643-653 (2005).
44. Elsworth, D., Lee, D. S.: Limits in determining permeability from on-the-fly Ucpt sounding. Geotechnique 57(8), 679-685 (2007).
45. Eslami, A., Fellenius, B. H.: CPT and CPTu data for soil profile interpretation: review of methods and a proposed new approach. Iran. J. Sci. Technol., Trans. A, Sci. 28(B1), 69-86 (2004).
46. Geoprobe-Systems: Probing times. Salina, Kansas (Spring) 14-15 (2010).
47. Gilkerson, R. C.: Groundwater collection takes a different twist-direct-push technology used in combination with mobile laboratories is an option for groundwater collection and sampling. Pollut. Eng. 27(1), 46-48 (1995).
48. Grandel, S., Dahmke, A.: Leitfaden Natürliche Schadstoffminderung bei LCKW-kontaminierten Standorten: Methoden, Empfehlungen und Hinweise zur Untersuchung und Beurteilung. BMBF-Förderschwerpunkt "Kontrollierter natürlicher Rückhalt und Abbau von Schadstoffen bei der Sanierung kontaminierter Grundwässer und Böden" (KORA); [KORA-Themenverbund 3 - chemische Industrie, Metallverarbeitung], S. 364. Kiel (2008).
49. Griffin, T. W., Watson, K. W.: A comparison of field techniques for confirming dense nonaqueous phase liquids. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 22(2), 48-59 (2002).
50. Grundl, T. J., Aldstadt, J. H., Harb, J. G., Germain, R. W. S., Schweitzer, R. C.: Demonstration of a method for the direct determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in submerged sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(6), 1189-1197 (2003).
51. Hannappel, S., Braun, P.: Conception and realization of a groundwater monitoring by direct push in Northern Brandenburg. Grundwasser 15(3), 191-201 (2010).
52. Hart, S. J., Chen, Y. M., Kenny, J. E., Lien, B. K., Best, T. W.: Field demonstration of a multichannel fiber-optic laser-induced fluorescence system in a cone penetrometer vehicle. Field Anal. Chem. Technol. 1(6), 343-355 (1997).
53. Hawthorne, S. B., St Germain, R. W., Azzolina, N. A.: Laser-induced fluorescence coupled with solid-phase microextraction for in situ determination of pahs in sediment pore water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(21), 8021-8026 (2008).
54. Herold, M., Ptak, T., Grathwohl, P.: A comparison of mass flow rate estimates based on point scale and integral measurements. Grundwasser 13(4), 231-240 (2008).
55. Herold, M., Ptak, T., Bayer-Raich, M., Wendel, T., Grathwohl, P.: Integral quantification of contaminant mass flow rates in a contaminated aquifer: conditioning of the numerical inversion of concentration-time series. J. Contam. Hydrol. 106(1-2), 29-38 (2009).
56. Hettiarachchi, H., Brown, T.: Use of SPT blow counts to estimate shear strength properties of soils: energy balance approach. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135(6), 830-834 (2009).
57. Hilhorst, M. A.: A pore water conductivity sensor. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64(6), 1922-1925 (2000).
58. Hinsby, K., Bjerg, P. L., Andersen, L. J., Skov, B., Clausen, E. V.: A mini slug test method for determination of a local hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined sandy aquifer. J. Hydrol. 136(1-4), 87-106 (1992).
59. HLUG: Altlastenannual 2008 - Hessisches Landesamt für Umwelt und Geologie (2009).
60. Hoffmann, S., Beilecke, T., Werban, U., Leven, C., Engeser, B., Polom, U.: Joint application of shear wave seismics and direct push methods in the site investigation of an urban aquifer. Grundwasser 13(2), 78-90 (2008).
61. Hofmann, T., Darsow, A., Groning, M., Aggarwal, P., Suckow, A.: Direct-push profiling of isotopic and hydrochemical vertical gradients. J. Hydrol. 385(1-4), 84-94 (2010).
62. Jackson, R. E., Meinardus, H. W.: Discussion of a comparison of field techniques for confirming dense nonaqueous phase liquids. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 23(2), 28 (2003).
63. Jaume, S. C.: Shear wave velocity profiles via seismic cone penetration test and refraction microtremor techniques at anss strong motion sites in Charleston. Seismol. Res. Lett. 77(6), 771-779 (2006).
64. Jefferies, M. G., Davies, M. P.: Soil classification by the cone penetration test-discussion. Can. Geotech. J. 28(1), 173-176 (1991).
65. Johnson, A. N., Boer, B. R., Woessner, W. W., Stanford, J. A., Poole, G. C., Thomas, S. A., O'Daniel, S. J.: Evaluation of an inexpensive small-diameter temperature logger for documenting ground water-river interactions. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 25(4), 68-74 (2005).
66. Kalbus, E., Reinstorf, F., Schirmer, M.: Measuring methods for groundwater-surface water interactions: a review. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 10(6), 873-887 (2006).
67. Kalbus, E., Schmidt, C., Reinstorf, F., Krieg, R., Schirmer, M.: How streambed temperatures can contribute to the determination of aquifer heterogeneity. Grundwasser 13(2), 91-100 (2008).
68. Kim, C. G., Lockington, D., Clarke, W. P., Kim, C. W.: Preliminary determination of pollutants plume in groundwater at hazardous solid waste disposal site by employing cpt and rig. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21(1), 17-30 (2000).
69. Kim, Y. S., Oh, M. H., Park, J.: Laboratory study on the dielectric properties of contaminated soil using CPT deployed probe. Geosci. J. 11(2), 121-130 (2007).
70. Köber, R., Hornbruch, G., Leven, C., Tischer, L., Grossmann, J., Dietrich, P., Weiss, H., Dahmke, A.: Evaluation of combined direct-push methods used for aquifer model generation. Ground Water 47(4), 536-546 (2009).
71. Kodesova, R., Gribb, M. M., Simunek, J.: Estimating soil hydraulic properties from transient cone permeameter data. Soil Sci. 163(6), 436-453 (1998).
72. Kögler, S.: Direct-Push-basierte Erkundungstechniken - Stand der Technik und Evaluierung der Methoden. Diplomarbeit, Fachhochschule Weihenstephan, Abteilung Triesdorf (2009).
73. Kraemer, C. A., Penn, W. E., Busa, M. D.: Use of the hydropunch for groundwater plume delineation: a case study. Sampl. Environ. Media 1282, 179-191 (1996).
74. Kram, M. L., Keller, A. A.: Complex NAPL site characterization using fluorescence, Part 2. Analysis of soil matrix effects on the excitation/emission matrix. Soil Sediment Contam. 13(2), 119-134 (2004a).
75. Kram, M. L., Keller, A. A.: Complex NAPL site characterization using fluorescence, Part 3. Detection capabilities for specific excitation sources. Soil Sediment Contam. 13(2), 135-148 (2004b).
76. Kram, M. L., Keller, A. A., Rossabi, J., Everett, L. G.: DNAPL characterization methods and approaches, Part 1. Performance comparisons. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 21(4), 109-123 (2001).
77. Kram, M. L., Keller, A. A., Rossabi, J., Everett, L. G.: DNAPL characterization methods and approaches, Part 2. Cost comparisons. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 22(1), 46-61 (2002).
78. Kram, M. L., Keller, A. A., Massick, S. M., Laverman, L. E.: Complex NAPL site characterization using fluorescence, Part 1. Selection of excitation wavelength based on NAPL composition. Soil Sediment Contam. 13(2), 103-118 (2004).
79. Kurup, P. U.: Novel technologies for sniffing soil and ground water contaminants. Curr. Sci. 97(8), 1212-1219 (2009).
80. Kurup, P. U., Issac, B., Griffin, E. P.: Electronic nose-membrane interface probe for geoenvironmental site characterization. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(9), 1133-1142 (2006).
81. LeBlanc, A. M., Fortier, R., Cosma, C., Allard, M.: Tomographic imaging of permafrost using three-component seismic cone-penetration test. Geophysics 71(5), H55-H65 (2006).
82. Lee, D. S., Elsworth, D., Hryciw, R.: Hydraulic conductivity measurement from on-the-fly ucpt sounding and from viscpt. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134(12), 1720-1729 (2008).
83. Lessoff, S. C., Schneidewind, U., Leven, C., Blum, P., Dietrich, P., Dagan, G.: Spatial characterization of the hydraulic conductivity using direct-push injection logging. Water Resour. Res. 46 (2010). doi: 10. 1029/2009WR008949.
84. Leven, C., Dietrich, P.: Studie über die Einsetzbarkeit der Direct Push-Technologie am Standort "Fischer Deponie Umfeld" (Unpublished report), S. 46. Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung-UFZ, Leipzig (2006).
85. Leven, C., Weiß, H., Koschitzky, H. P., Blum, P., Ptak, T., Dietrich, P.: Direct-Push-Verfahren. Stuttgart E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart (2010).
86. Liu, G. S., Bohling, G. C., Butler, J. J.: Simulation assessment of the direct-push permeameter for characterizing vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity. Water Resour. Res. 44(2) (2008). doi: 10. 1029/2007WR006078.
87. Liu, G. S., Butler, J. J., Bohling, G. C., Reboulet, E., Knobbe, S., Hyndman, D. W.: A new method for high-resolution characterization of hydraulic conductivity. Water Resources Research 45 (2009). doi: 10. 1029/2009WR008319.
88. LUGV: Qualitätssicherungsmaßnahmen bei innovativen direkten/indirekten Probennahmeverfahren für Boden, Grund-, Sickerwasser, Schadstoffphase und Bodenluft im Rahmen der Altlastenbearbeitung. Altlastenbearbeitung im Land Brandenburg - Fachinformation des Landesamtes für Umwelt, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz Nr. 18. Landesamtes für Umwelt Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz, Potsdam (2010).
89. Lunne, T., Robertson, P. K., Powell, J. J.: Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. Spon Press, New York (1997).
90. Lutenegger, A. J., Degroot, D. J.: Techniques for sealing cone penetrometer holes. Can. Geotech. J. 32(5), 880-891 (1995).
91. Martac, E., Zamfirescu, D., Teutsch, G., Blessing, M., Schmidt, T., Preuß, E., Tschauder, G., Meyer, J., Peter, G.: Altstandort chemische Reinigung Rosengarten-Ehestorf - Felduntersuchungen zur Abschätzung des Natural-attenuation-Potenzials. TerraTech 11-12, 9-11 (2007).
92. Mayne, P. W.: Cone penetration testing. A synthesis of highway practice. Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Research Program, NCHRP Synthesis 368, Washington, DC, USA (2007).
93. McAndrews, B., Heinze, K., DiGuiseppi, W.: Defining TCE plume source areas using the membrane interface probe (MIP). Soil Sediment Contam. 12(6), 799-813 (2003).
94. McCall, W., Nielsen, D. M., Farrington, S., Christy, T. M.: Use of Direct-Push Technologies in Environmental Site Characterization and Ground-Water Monitoring. Practical Handbook of Environmental Site Characterization and Ground-Water Monitoring. CRS Press, Boca Raton (2006).
95. McCall, W., Christy, T. M., Christopherson, T., Issacs, H.: Application of direct push methods to investigate uranium distribution in an alluvial aquifer. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 29(4), 65-76 (2009).
96. Michels, J., Stuhrmann, M., Frey, C., Koschitzky, H.-P.: Handlungsempfehlungen mit Methodensammlung: Natürliche Schadstoffminderung bei der Sanierung von Altlasten; Bewertung und Anwendung, Rechtliche Aspekte, Wirtschaftlichkeit, Akzeptanz; Projektübergreifende Begleitung des BMBF-Förderschwerpunktes KORA. DECHEMA, Frankfurt, M. (2008).
97. Miles, B., Kalbacher, T., Kolditz, O., Chen, C., Gronewold, J., Wang, W., Peter, A.: Development and parameterisation of a complex hydrogeological model based on high-resolution direct-push data. Environ. Geol. 52(7), 1399-1412 (2007).
98. Molz, F. J., Morin, R. H., Hess, A. E., Melville, J. G., Guven, O.: The impeller meter for measuring aquifer permeability variations-evaluation and comparison with other tests. Water Resour. Res. 25(7), 1677-1683 (1989).
99. Mondelli, G., Giacheti, H. L., Boscov, M. E. G., Elis, V. R., Hamada, J.: Geoenvironmental site investigation using different techniques in a municipal solid waste disposal site in Brazil. Environ. Geol. 52(5), 871-887 (2007).
100. Mosier-Boss, P. A., Lieberman, S. H.: Detection of lead derived from automotive scrap residue using a direct push fiber-optic laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy metal sensor. Appl. Spectrosc. 59(12), 1445-1456 (2005).
101. Mosier-Boss, P. A., Lieberman, S. H., Theriault, G. A.: Field demonstrations of a direct push FO-LIBS metal sensor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36(18), 3968-3976 (2002).
102. Müller, M., Mohnke, O., Schmalholz, J., Yaramanci, U.: Moisture assessment with small-scale geophysics-the interurban project. Near Surf. Geophys. 1(4), 173-181 (2003).
103. Neuhaus, M.: Spatial in situ delineation of soil and groundwater contamination with environmental CPT. In: Breh, W., Gottlieb, J., Hötzl, H., et al. (eds.) Field Screening 2001-Second International Conference on Strategies and Techniques for Investigation and Monitoring of Contaminated Sites, pp. 71-78. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2001).
104. Noce, T. E., Holzer, T. L.: CPT-Hole closure. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 23(1), 93-96 (2003).
105. Owuama, C. O.: Semi-empirical method interpretation of cone penetration test (CPT) data. Discov. Innov. 13(3-4), 213-226 (2001).
106. Paasche, H., Werban, U., Dietrich, P.: Near-surface seismic traveltime tomography using a direct-push source and surface-planted geophones. Geophysics 74(4), G17-G25 (2009).
107. Parez, L., Fauriel, R.: Le piezocone ameliorations apportees a la reconnaissance de sols. Rev. Fr. Géotech. (Paris) 44, 13-27 (1988).
108. Pepper, J. W., Wright, A. O., Kenny, J. E.: In situ measurements of subsurface contaminants with a multi-channel laser-induced fluorescence system. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 58(2), 317-331 (2002).
109. Peter, A., Vigelahn, L., Dietrich, P.: Frachtenbestimmung im Abstrom eines Schadensherds. Direct-Push-Technik zur Erkundung von Natural Attenuation. TerraTech 17(3), 12-14 (2008).
110. Pitkin, S. E., Cherry, J. A., Ingleton, R. A., Broholm, M.: Field demonstrations using the waterloo ground water profiler. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 19(2), 122-131 (1999).
111. PtWt + E: Kontrollierter natürlicher Rückhalt und Abbau von Schadstoffen bei der Sanierung kontaminierter Grundwäser und Böden- Eine Zusammenstellung der laufenden Projekte (2002).
112. Raschke, S. A., Hryciw, R. D.: Vision cone penetrometer for direct subsurface soil observation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123(11), 1074-1076 (1997).
113. Rein, A., Popp, S., Zacharias, S., Leven, C., Bittens, M., Dietrich, P.: Comparison of approaches for the characterization of contamination at rural megasites. Environ. Earth Sci. 63(6), 1239-1249 (2011).
114. Robertson, P. K.: Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can. Geotech. J. 27(1), 151-158 (1990).
115. Robertson, P. K.: Soil classification using the cone penetration test-reply. Can. Geotech. J. 28(1), 176-178 (1991).
116. Robertson, P. K.: Interpretation of cone penetration tests-a unified approach. Can. Geotech. J. 46(11), 1337-1355 (2009).
117. Robertson, P. K., Campanella, R. G., Gillespie, D., Greig, J.: Use of piezometer cone data. In: In Situ '86: Use of in Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE Specialty Conference), pp. 1263-1280. American Society of Engineers (ASCE), Blacksburg (1986).
118. Robertson, P. K., Woeller, D. J., Finn, W. D. L.: Seismic cone penetration test for evaluating liquefaction potential under cyclic loading. Can. Geotech. J. 29(4), 686-695 (1992).
119. Rogers, J. D.: Subsurface exploration using the standard penetration test and the cone penetrometer test. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12(2), 161-179 (2006).
120. Schechter, I.: Laser induced plasma spectroscopy. Rev. Anal. Chem. 16(3), 173-298 (1997).
121. Schulmeister, M. K., Butler, J. J., Healey, J. M., Zheng, L., Wysocki, D. A., McCall, G. W.: Direct-push electrical conductivity logging for high-resolution hydrostratigraphic characterization. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 23(3), 52-62 (2003).
122. Schulmeister, M. K., Healey, J. M., Butler, J. J., McCall, G. W.: Direct-push geochemical profiling for assessment of inorganic chemical heterogeneity in aquifers. J. Contam. Hydrol. 69(3-4), 215-232 (2004).
123. Sellwood, S. M., Healey, J. M., Birk, S., Butler, J. J.: Direct-push hydrostratigraphic profiling: coupling electrical logging and slug tests. Ground Water 43(1), 19-29 (2005).
124. Semkiw, E. S., Barcelona, M. J.: Field study of enhanced tce reductive dechlorination by a full-scale whey PRB. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 31(1), 68-78 (2011).
125. Shinn, J. D., Timian, D. A., Morey, R. M., Mitchell, G., Antle, C. L., Hull, R.: Development of a CPT deployed probe for in situ measurement of volumetric soil moisture content and electrical resistivity. Field Anal. Chem. Technol. 2(2), 103-109 (1998).
126. Siebenborn, G.: Kleinborhungen nach Din 4021 - eine (Ge-)Wissensfrage? bbr Fachmag. Brunnen- Leit. 56(5), 37-41 (2005).
127. Smolley, M., Kappmeyer, J. C.: Cone penetrometer tests and hydropunch sampling-a screening technique for plume definition. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 11(2), 101-106 (1991).
128. Tanaka, H., Tanaka, M., Suzuki, S., Sakagami, T.: Development of a new cone penetrometer and its application to great depths of pleistocene clays. Soil Found. 43(6), 51-61 (2003).
129. Tumay, M. T., Kurup, P. U.: Development of a continuous intrusion miniature cone penetration test system for subsurface explorations. Soil Found. 41(6), 129-138 (2001).
130. Ulusay, R., Tuncay, E., Hasancebi, N.: Liquefaction assessments by field-based methodologies: foundation soils at a dam site in Northeast Turkey. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 66(3), 361-375 (2007).
131. US-EPA: Expedited Site Assessment Tools for Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide for Regulators. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Underground Storage Tanks (1997).
132. Vogt, T., Schneider, P., Hahn-Woernle, L., Cirpka, O. A.: Estimation of seepage rates in a losing stream by means of fiber-optic high-resolution vertical temperature profiling. J. Hydrol. 380(1-2), 154-164 (2010).
133. Wabbels, D., Teutsch, G.: Leitfaden natürliche Schadstoffminderungsprozesse bei mineralölkontaminierten Standorten: Methoden, Empfehlungen und Hinweise zur Untersuchung und Beurteilung "Raffinerien, Tanklager, Kraftstoffe/Minaralöl, MTBE" im Bmbf-Förderschwerpunkt "Kontrollierter natürlicher Rückhalt und Abbau von Schadstoffen bei der Sanierung kontaminierter Grunbdwässer und Böden" (KORA), S. 221. Tübingen (2008).
134. Weiß, H., Ptak, T., Batereau, K., Busch, K. J., Flachowsky, J.: Innovative Mess- und Überwachungsmethoden (Grundwassermonitoring). E. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart (2006).
135. Werban, U., Leven, C., Reboulet, E., Leccese, M., Viotti, P., Dietrich, P.: Technologies for a fast characterization of subsurface structures-an example from the Milano-Rho site. Italian J. Eng. Geol. Environ. (Spec. Iss.) 1, 115-122 (2007).
136. Werner, P.: Leitfaden "Natürliche Schadstoffminderung bei Teerölaltlasten": Themenverbund 2 "Gaswerke, Kokereien, Teerverarbeitung, (Holz-)Imprägnierung" im BMBF-Förderschwerpunkt "Kontrollierter natürlicher Rückhalt und Abbau von Schadstoffen bei der Sanierung kontaminierter Grundwässer und Böden" (KORA); Dresden (2008).
137. Wyatt, D. E., Waddell, M. G., Sexton, G. B.: Geophysics and shallow faults in unconsolidated sediments. Ground Water 34(2), 326-334 (1996).
138. Zemo, D. A., Delfino, T. A., Gallinatti, J. D., Baker, V. A., Hilpert, L. R.: Field comparison of analytical results from discrete-depth ground-water samplers. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 15(1), 133-141 (1995).
139. Zemo, D. A., Pierce, Y. G., Gallinatti, J. D.: Cone penetrometer testing and discrete-depth ground-water sampling techniques-a cost-effective method of site characterization in a multiple-aquifer setting. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 14(4), 176-182 (1994).
140. Zhang, Q., Al-Nuaimy, W., Huang, Y.: Detection of deeply buried UXO using CPT magnetometers. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45(2), 410-417 (2007).
141. Zhang, Z. J., Tumay, M. T.: Simplification of soil classification charts derived from the cone penetration test. ASTM Geotech. Test. J. 19(2), 203-216 (1996).
142. Zlotnik, V. A., Zurbuchen, B. R.: Estimation of hydraulic conductivity from borehole flowmeter tests considering head losses. J. Hydrol. 281(1-2), 115-128 (2003a).
143. Zlotnik, V. A., Zurbuchen, B. R.: Field study of hydraulic conductivity in a heterogeneous aquifer: comparison of single-borehole measurements using different instruments. Water Resour. Res. 39(4) (2003b) 1101 doi: 10. 1029/2002WR001415.
144. Zlotnik, V. A., Burbach, M., Swinehart, J., Bennett, D., Fritz, S. C., Loope, D. B., Olaguera, F.: Using direct-push methods for aquifer characterization in dune-lake environments of the Nebraska sand hills. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13(3), 205-216 (2007).