A rapid method for hydraulic profiling in unconsolidated formations

Ground Water

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 323-328

  Dietrich, Peter ^c   Butler Jr , James J ^a   Faiß, Klaus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Mess und Probenahmetechnik Berndsen und Faiß GbR ^*  (Germany)

^c HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMPURITIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

INJECTION LOGGER; INJECTION RATE;

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY;

WATER;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ESTIMATION METHOD; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; SPATIAL VARIATION; WATER DEPTH;

ARTICLE; PRESSURE; TECHNIQUE;

METHODS; PRESSURE; WATER;

EID: 40149099906     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00377.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Butler, J.J. Jr. 2005. Hydrogeological methods for estimation of hydraulic conductivity. In Hydrogeophysics, ed. Y. Rubin and S. Hubbard, 23 58. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
2. Butler, J.J. Jr. 2002. A simple correction for slug tests in small-diameter wells. Ground Water 40, no. 3: 303 307.
3. Butler, J.J. Jr., P. Dietrich, V. Wittig, and T. Christy. 2007. Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter. Ground Water 45, no. 4: 409 419.
4. Butler, J.J. Jr., J.M. Healey, G.W. McCall, E.J. Garnett, and S.P. Loheide II. 2002. Hydraulic tests with direct-push equipment. Ground Water 40, no. 1: 25 36.
5. Crisman, S.A., F.J. Molz, D.L. Dunn, and F.C. Sappington. 2001. Application procedures for the electromagnetic borehole flowmeter in shallow unconfined aquifers. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 21, no. 4: 96 100.
6. Dietrich, P., and C. Leven. 2006. Direct push technologies. In Groundwater Geophysics, ed. R. Kirsch, 321 340. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
7. Goldbeck, J. 2002. Hydrogeophysical methods at test site Nauen - Evaluation and optimization. Master thesis at the Technical University of Berlin, Institute of Applied Geoscience, Berlin.
8. McCall, W., D.M. Nielsen, S. Farrington, and T.C. Christy. 2005. Use of direct-push technologies in environmental site characterization and ground-water monitoring. In The Practical Handbook of Environmental Site Characterization and Ground-Water Monitoring, 2nd ed., ed. D.M. Nielsen, 345 472. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
9. Molz, F.J., and S.C. Young. 1993. Development and application of borehole flowmeters for environmental assessment. Log Analyst 34, no. 1: 13 23.
10. Pitkin, S.E., and M.D. Rossi. 2000. A real time indicator of hydraulic conductivity distribution used to select groundwater sampling depths. Eos 81, no. 19: S239.
11. Sellwood, S.M., J.M. Healey, S. Birk, and J.J. Butler Jr. 2005. Direct-push hydrostratigraphic profiling: Coupling electrical logging and slug tests. Ground Water 43, no. 1: 19 29.
12. Vennard, J.K., and R.L. Street. 1975. Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
13. Yaramanci, U., G. Lange, and M. Hertrich. 2002. Aquifer characterisation with surface-NMR and other geophysical techniques at the test site Nauen/Berlin. Journal of Applied Geophysics, Special Issue on Surface-NMR 50, no. 1-2, 47 65.