Spatial characterization of the hydraulic conductivity using direct-push injection logging

Water Resources Research

Volumn 46, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Lessoff, Steven C ^a   Schneidewind, Uwe ^b   Leven, Carsten ^c   Blum, Philipp ^d   Dietrich, Peter ^b   Dagan, Gedeon ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^d KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIRECT-PUSH; FLOW AND TRANSPORT; GAIN INFORMATION; GERMANY; HETEROGENEOUS AQUIFERS; K-VALUES; NEW APPLICATIONS; RAPID MEASUREMENT; SLUG TESTING; SPATIAL CHARACTERIZATION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL MOMENTS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; TEST SITE; UNCONSOLIDATED FORMATIONS;

AQUIFERS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; SOLUTE TRANSPORT;

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY;

AQUIFER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROGEOLOGY; LOGGING (GEOPHYSICS); SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

GERMANY;

EID: 78649920674     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008949     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Butler, J. J., Jr. (1998), The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests, Lewis, Boca Raton, Fla.
2. Butler, J. J., Jr. (2002), A simple correction for slug tests in small-diameter wells, Ground Water, 40, 303-308, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002. tb02658.x.
3. Butler, J. J., Jr., and P. Dietrich (2004), New methods for high-resolution characterization of spatial variations in hydraulic conductivity, paper presented at the International Symposium on Hydrogeological Investigation and Remedial Technology, Natl. Central Univ., Jhongli, Taiwan.
4. Butler, J. J., Jr., J. M. Healey, G. W. McCall, E. J. Garnett, and S. P. Loheide II (2002), Hydraulic tests with direct-push equipment, Ground Water, 40, 25-36, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02488.x.
5. Butler, J. J., Jr., P. Dietrich, V. Wittig, and T. Christy (2007), Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct push permeameter, Ground Water, 45, 409-419, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00300.x.
6. Dagan, G. (1989), Flow and Transport in Porous Formations, Springer, New York.
7. Dietrich, P., and C. Leven (2006), Direct push technologies, in Groundwater Geophysics, edited by R. Kirsch, pp. 321-340, doi:10.1007/3-540- 29387-6-11, Springer, Berlin, New York.
8. Dietrich, P., J. J. Butler Jr., and K. Faiss (2008), A rapid method for hydraulic profiling in unconsolidated formations, Ground Water, 46, 323-328, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00377.x.
9. Gelhar, L. W. (1993), Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
10. Hinsby, K., P. L. Bjerg, L. J. Andersen, B. Skov, and E. V. Clausen (1992), A mini slug test method for determination of a local hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined sandy aquifer, J. Hydrol. Amsterdam, 136, 87-106, doi:10.1016/0022-1694 (92) 90006-H.
11. Indelman, P., and G. Dagan (2004), A note on well boundary condition for flow through heterogeneous formations, Water Resour. Res., 40, W03601, doi:10.1029/2003WR002602.
12. Köber, G. R., C. Hornbruch, L. Leven, J. Tischer, P. D. Grosmann, H. Weis, and A. Dahmke (2009), Evaluation of combined direct-push methods used for aquifer model generation, Ground Water, 47, 536-546, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584. 2009.00554.x.
13. Liu, B. J. J., G. Butler Jr., G. C. Bohling, E. Reboulet, S. Knobbe, and D. W. Hyndman (2009), A new method for high-resolution characterization of hydraulic conductivity, Water Resour. Res., 45, W08202, doi:10.1029/ 2009WR008319.
14. Neuman, S., A. Guadagnini, and M. Riva (2004), Type-curve estimation of statistical heterogeneity, Water Resour. Res., 40, W04201, doi:10.1029/ 2003WR002405.
15. Neuman, S. P., A. Blattstein, M. Riva, D. M. Tartakovsky, A. Guadagnini, and T. Ptak (2007), Type curve interpretation of late-time pumping test data in randomly heterogeneous aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 43, W10421, doi:10.1029/2007WR005871.
16. Remy, N., A. Boucher, and J. Wu (2009), Applied Geostatistics With SGEMS: A User's Guide, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
17. Riva, M., L. Guadagnini, A. Guadagnini, T. Ptak, and E. Martac (2006), Probabilistic study of well capture zones distribution at the Lauswiesen field site, J. Contam. Hydrol., 88, 92-118, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.06.005.
18. Riva, M., L. Guadagnini, D. Fernandez-Garcia, X. Sanchez-Vila, T. Ptak, and E. Martac (2008), Relative importance of geostatistical and transport models in describing heavily tailed breakthrough curves at the Lauswiesen site, J. Contam. Hydrol., 101, 1-13, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.07.004.
19. Rubin, Y. (2003), Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
20. Sack-Kühner, B. T. (1996), Einrichtung des Naturmerfeldes "Lauswiesen Tü-bingen, " Erkundung der hydraulischen Eigenschaften, Charakterisierung der Untergrundheterogenität und Vergleich der Ergebnisse unterschiedlicher Erkundungsverfahren, diploma thesis, Eberhard Karls Univ., Tübingen, Germany.
21. Schneidewind, U. (2008), Determination of hydraulic conductivity using direct-push injection logger, M. S. thesis, Eberhard Karls Univ., Tübingen, Germany.
22. Springer, R., and L. Gelhar (1991), Characterization of large scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory response, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, in Proceedings of the Technical Meeting Monterey, California, March 11-15, 1991, U. S. Geological Survey, Toxic Substances Hydrology Program, WRI Rep. 91-4034, edited by G. Mallard and D. Aronson, pp. 36-40, U. S. Geol. Surv., Reston, Va.
23. Zlotnik, V. A., and V. L. McGuire (1998), Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations: 1. Modified Springer-Gelhar model, J. Hydrol. Amsterdam, 204, 271-282, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694 (97) 00128-5.