Spatial characterization of hydraulic conductivity in alluvial gravel-and-sand aquifers: A comparison of methods;Räumliche Charakterisierung der hydraulischen Leitfähigkeit in alluvialen Schotter-Grundwasserleitern: Ein Methodenvergleich

Grundwasser

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 241-251

  Diem, Samuel ^a   Vogt, Tobias ^a   Hoehn, Eduard ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Flowmeter logs; Gravel and sand aquifer; Hydraulic conductivity; Pumping test; Sieve analyses; Slug tests

Indexed keywords

ALLUVIAL DEPOSIT; ANISOTROPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOW MEASUREMENT; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; SAND AND GRAVEL; SIEVING; SLUG TEST; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

SWITZERLAND; THUR BASIN;

EID: 78649693680     PISSN: 1430483X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00767-010-0153-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beyer, W.: Zur Bestimmung der Wasserdurchlässigkeit von Kiesen und Sanden aus der Kornverteilung. Wasserwirtschaft-Wassertechnik (WWT) 14, 165-168 (1964).
2. Bouwer, H., Rice, R. C.: Slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 12(3), 423-428 (1976).
3. Bradbury, K. R., Muldoon, M. A.: Hydraulic conductivity determinations in unlithified glacial and fluvial materials. Ground Water Vadose Zone Monit., 138-151 (1990).
4. Brauchler, R., Hu, R., Vogt, T., Al-Halbouni, D., Heinrichs, T., Ptak, T., Sauter, M.: Cross-well slug interference tests: an effective characterization method for resolving aquifer heterogeneity. J. Hydrol. 384(12), 33-45 (2010).
5. Butler, J. J. Jr.: The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests. 252 S. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton (1998).
6. Butler, J. J. Jr.: Hydrogeological methods for estimation of spatial variations in hydraulic conductivity. In: Hydrogeophysics, S. 523. Springer, Dordrecht (2005). Chap. 2.
7. Casati, A.: Die Durchlässigkeit kiesiger Böden. Monatsbulletin SVGW 6, 120-126 (1959).
8. Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.: DIN 18123: Baugrund; Untersuchung von Bodenproben. Bestimmung der Korngrößenverteilung (1983).
9. Dr. Heinrich Jäckli AG: Die Grundwasservorkommen im Kanton Thurgau. 88 S.; Amt für Umwelt des Kantons Thurgau, Frauenfeld (2003).
10. Gmünder, C., Spring, U.: Grundwasserströme und Grundwasserbilanzen - Grundwassermodell Thurtal. Mitt. Thurg. Naturf. Ges. 63, 155-174 (2009).
11. Hazen, A.: Some physical properties of sands and gravels with special reference to their use in filtration. Am. Rep. Mass. State Bd. Health 24, 541-556 (1893).
12. HydroSOLVE, Inc.: AQTESOLV® Pro 4. 50. 002, Manual (2007).
13. Jussel, P., Stauffer, F., Dracos, T.: Transport modeling in heterogeneous aquifers. 1. Statistical description and numerical generation of gravel deposits. Water Resour. Res. 30(6), 1803-1817 (1994).
14. Keusen, H. R.: Neue quartärgeologische Erkenntnisse von Baugrunduntersuchungen für die N7 im Kanton Thurgau. Mitt. Thurg. Naturf. Ges. 41, 91-104 (1976).
15. Millham, N. P., Howes, B. L.: A comparison of methods to determine K in a shallow coastal aquifer. Ground Water 33(1), 49-57 (1995).
16. Molz, F. J.: The impeller meter for measuring aquifer permeability variations: evaluation and comparison with other tests. Water Resour. Res. 25(7), 1677-1683 (1989).
17. Naef, H., Frank, S.: Neue Erkenntnisse zur Entstehung und zum Aufbau des Thurtaler Grundwasserträgers zwischen Bürglen und Niederneunforn. Mitt. Thurg. Naturf. Ges. 63, 63-106 (2009).
18. Neuman, S. P.: Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the watertable. Water Resour. Res. 8(4), 1031-1045 (1972).
19. Niemann, W. L., Rovey, C. W. II: Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values obtained from aquifer pumping tests and conservative tracer tests. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 20(3), 122-128 (2000).
20. Regli, C., Rauber, M., Huggenberger, P.: Analysis of aquifer heterogeneity within a well capture zone, comparison of model data with field experiments: a case study from the river Wiese, Switzerland. Aquat. Sci. 65, 111-128 (2003).
21. Schulze-Makuch, D., Carlson, D. A., Cherkauer, D. S., Malik, P.: Scale dependency of hydraulic conductivity in heterogeneous media. Ground Water 37(6), 904-919 (1999).
22. Springer, R. K., Gelhar, L. W.: Characterization of large-scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory response, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. U. S. Geol. Surv. Water Res. Invest. Rep. 91, 36-40 (1991).