Discrimination of modes of action of antifungal substances by use of metabolic footprinting

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 70, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 6157-6165

  Allen, Jess ^a   Davey, Hazel M ^a   Broadhurst, David ^a   Rowland, Jem J ^a   Oliver, Stephen G ^b   Kell, Douglas B ^a,b  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; BIOSYNTHESIS; DENSITY (OPTICAL); LEARNING SYSTEMS; MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ANTIFUNGAL SUBSTANCES; DIPLOID CELLS; RESPIRATORY CHAINS;

METABOLISM;

AEC 605025; AZOXYSTROBIN; CARBOXIN; CHLORIMURON ETHYL; EPOXICONAZOLE; FENPROPIMORPH; FLUAZINAM; FLUQUINCONAZOLE; FUNGICIDE; KRESOXIM METHYL; TRIADIMENOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

MICROBIOLOGY;

AMINO ACID SYNTHESIS; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPLOIDY; FUNGUS CULTURE; FUNGUS GROWTH; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLIC FOOTPRINTING; METABOLIC REGULATION; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL DENSITY; RESPIRATORY CHAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STEROL SYNTHESIS; SUPERNATANT;

ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; ANTIMETABOLITES; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

FUNGI; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 8144230574     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6157-6165.2004     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allen, J. K., H. M. Davey, D. Broadhurst, J. K. Heald, J. J. Rowland, S. G. Oliver, and D. B. Kell. 2003. High-throughput characterisation of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:692-696.
2. Aranibar, N., B. K. Singh, G. W. Stockton, and K.-H. Ott. 2001. Automated mode-of-action detection by metabolic profiling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 286:150-155.
3. Bammert, G. F., and J. M. Fostel. 2000. Genome-wide expression patterns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of drug treatments and genetic alterations affecting biosynthesis of ergosterol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1255-1265.
4. Banzhaf, W., P. Nordin, R. E. Keller, and F. D. Francone. 1998. Genetic programming: an introduction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif.
5. Castrillo, J. I., A. Hayes, S. Mohammed, S. J. Gaskell, and S. G. Oliver. 2003. An optimized protocol for metabolome analysis in yeast using direct infusion electrospray mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry 62:929-937.
6. Corran, A. J., A. Renwick and S. Dunbar. 1998. Approaches to in vitro lead generation for fungicide invention. Pestic. Sci. 54:338-344.
7. Fell, D. A. 1996. Understanding the control of metabolism. Portland Press, London, United Kingdom.
8. Fiehn, O. 2001. Combining genomics, metabolome analysis, and biochemical modelling to understand metabolic networks. Comp. Func. Genomics 2:155-168.
9. Giaever, G., A. M. Chu, L. Ni, C. Connelly, L. Riles, S. Veronneau, S. Dow, A. Lucau-Danila, K. Anderson, B. Andre, A. P. Arkin, A. Astromoff, M. El Bakkoury, R. Bangham, R. Benito, S. Brachat, S. Campanaro, M. Curtiss, K. Davis, A. Deutschbauer, K. D. Entian, P. Flaherty, F. Foury, D. J. Garfinkel, M. Gerstein, D. Gotte, U. Guldener, J. H. Hegemann, S. Hempel, Z. Herman, D. F. Jaramillo, D. E. Kelly, S. L. Kelly, P. Kotter, D. LaBonte, D. C. Lamb, N. Lan, H. Liang, H. Liao, L. Liu, C. Luo, M. Lussier, R. Mao, P. Menard, S. L. Ooi, J. L. Revuelta, C. J. Roberts, M. Rose, P. Ross-Macdonald, B. Scherens, G. Schimmack, B. Shafer, D. D. Shoemaker, S. Sookhai-Mahadeo, R. K. Storms, J. N. Strathern, G. Valle, M. Voet, G. Volckaert, C. Y. Wang, T. R. Ward, J. Wilhelmy, E. A. Winzeler, Y. Yang, G. Yen, E. Youngman, K. Yu, H. Bussey, J. D. Boeke, M. Snyder, P. Philippsen, R. W. Davis, and M. Johnston. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.
10. Giaever, G., D. D. Shoemaker, T. W. Jones, H. Liang, E. A. Winzeler, A. Astromoff, and R. W. Davis. 1999. Genomic profiling of drug sensitivities via induced haploinsufficiency. Nat. Genet. 21:278-283.
11. Goodacre, R. 2003. Explanatory analysis of spectroscopic data using machine learning of simple, interpretable rules. Vib. Spectrosc. 32:33-45.
12. Goodacre, R., and D. B. Kell. 2003. Evolutionary computation for the interpretation of metabolome data, p. 239-256. In G. G. Harrigan and R. Goodacre (ed), Metabolic profiling: its role in biomarker discovery and gene function analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass.
13. Goodacre, R., B. Shann, R. J. Gilbert, E. M. Timmins, A. C. McGovern, B. K. Alsberg, D. B. Kell, and N. A. Logan. 2000. Detection of the dipicolinic acid biomarker in Bacillus spores using Curie-point pyrolysis mass spectrometry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 72:119-127.
14. Goodacre, R., S. Vaidyanathan, W. B. Dunn, G. G. Harrigan, and D. B. Kell. 2004. Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol. 22:245-252.
15. Heinrich, R., and T. A. Rapoport. 1974. A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. Eur. J. Biochem. 42:89-95.
16. Heinrich, R., and S. Schuster. 1996. The regulation of cellular systems. Chapman & Hall, New York, N.Y.
17. Hewitt, H. G. 1998. Fungicides in crop protection. CAB International, Oxford, United Kingdom.
18. Hole, S. J. W., P. W. A. Howe, P. D. Stanley, and S. T. Hadfield. 2000. Pattern recognition analysis of endogenous cell metabolites for high throughput mode of action identification: removing the postscreening dilemma associated with whole-organism high throughput screening. J. Biomol. Screen. 5:335-342.
19. Hughes, T. R., M. J. Marton, A. R. Jones, C. J. Roberts, R. Stoughton, C. D. Armour, H. A. Bennett, E. Coffey, H. Y. Dai, Y. D. D. He, M. J. Kidd, A. M. King, M. R. Meyer, D. Slade, P. Y. Lum, S. B. Stepaniants, D. D. Shoemaker, D. Gachotte, K. Chakraburtty, J. Simon, M. Bard, and S. H. Friend. 2000. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102:109-126.
20. Jia, M. H., R. A. Larossa, J. M. Lee, A. Rafalski, E. Derose, G. Gonye, and Z. X. Xue. 2000. Global expression profiling of yeast treated with an inhibitor of amino acid biosynthesis, sulfometuron methyl. Physiol. Genomics 3:83-92.
21. Kacser, H., and J. A. Burns. 1973. The control of flux, p. 65-104. In D. D. Davies (ed.), Rate control of biological processes. Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology, vol. 27. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
22. Kaderbhai, N. N., D. I. Broadhurst, D. I. Ellis, R. Goodacre, and D. B. Kell. 2003. Functional genomics via metabolic footprinting: monitoring metabolite secretion by Escherichia coli tryptophan metabolism mutants using FT-IR and direct injection electrospray mass spectrometry. Comp. Func. Genomics 4:376-391.
23. Kell, D. B. 2002. Defence against the flood: a solution to the data mining and predictive modelling challenges of today. Bioinform. World 1:16-18. [Online.] http://www.abergc.com/biwpp16-18_as_publ.pdf.
24. Kell, D. B. 2002. Genotype-phenotype mapping: genes as computer programs. Trends Genet. 18:555-559.
25. Kell, D. B. 2002. Metabolomics and machine learning: explanatory analysis of complex metabolome data using genetic programming to produce simple, robust rules. Mol. Biol. Rep. 29:237-241.
26. Kell, D. B. 2004. Metabolomics and systems biology: making sense of the soup. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7:296-307.
27. Kell, D. B., R. M. Darby, and J. Draper. 2001. Genomic computing: explanatory analysis of plant expression profiling data using machine learning. Plant Physiol. 126:943-951.
28. Kell, D. B., and S. G. Oliver. 2004. Here is the evidence, now what is the hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypothesis-driven science in the post-genomic era. Bioessays 26:99-105.
29. Kell, D. B., and H. V. Westerhoff. 1986. Metabolic control theory: its role in microbiology and biotechnology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39:305-320.
30. Koza, J. R. 1994. Genetic programming II: automatic discovery of reusable programs. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
31. Koza, J. R. 1992. Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
32. Koza, J. R., F. H. Bennett, M. A. Keane, and D. Andre. 1999. Genetic programming III: Darwinian invention and problem solving. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif.
33. Koza, J. R., M. A. Keane, M. J. Streeter, W. Mydlowec, J. Yu, and G. Lanza. 2003. Genetic programming: routine human-competitive machine intelligence. Kluwer, New York, N.Y.
34. Kuruvilla, F. G., A. F. Shamji, S. M. Sternson, P. J. Hergenrother, and S. L. Schreiber. 2002. Dissecting glucose signalling with diversity-oriented synthesis and small-molecule microarrays. Nature 416:653-657.
35. Langdon, W. B. 1998. Genetic programming and data structures: genetic programming + data structures = automatic programming! Kluwer, Boston, Mass.
36. Langdon, W. B., and R. Poli. 2002. Foundations of genetic programming. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
37. Marton, M. J., J. L. DeRisi, H. A. Bennett, V. R. Iyer, M. R. Meyer, C. J. Roberts, R. Stoughton, J. Burchard, D. Slade, H. Y. Dai, D. E. Bassett, L. H. Hartwell, P. O. Brown, and S. H. Friend. 1998. Drug target validation and identification of secondary drug target effects using DNA microarrays. Nat. Med. 4:1293-1301.
38. Ott, K.-H., N. Aranibar, B. Singh, and G. W. Stockton. 2003. Metabonomics classifies pathways affected by bioactive compounds. Artificial neural network classification of NMR spectra of plant extracts. Phytochemistry 62:971-985.
39. Panek, A. C., S. C. Poppe, A. D. Panek, and V. B. C. Junqueira. 1990. Effect of dimethylsulfoxide on signal transduction in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 23:105-111.
40. Phillips, M. K., and D. B. Kell. 1982. A novel inhibitor of NADH dehydrogenase in Paracoccus denitrificans. FEBS Lett. 140:248-250.
41. Raamsdonk, L. M., B. Tensink, D. Broadhurst, N. Zhang, A. Hayes, M. Walsh, J. A. Berden, K. M. Brindle, D. B. Kell, J. J. Rowland, H. V. Westerhoff, K. van Dam, and S. G. Oliver. 2001. A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:45-50.
42. Roessner, U., A. Luedemann, D. Brust, O. Fiehn, T. Linke, L. Willmitzer, and A. R. Fernie. 2001. Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell 13:11-29.
43. Rowland, J. J. 2003. Model selection methodology in supervised learning with evolutionary computation. BioSystems 72:187-196.
44. Spaltmann, F., M. Blunck, and K. Ziegelbauer. 1999. Computer-aided target selection-prioritizing targets for antifungal drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 4:17-26.
45. White, T. A., and D. B. Kell. 2004. Comparative genomic assessment of novel broad-spectrum targets for antibacterial drugs. Comp. Func. Genomics 5:304-327.
46. Zhu, H., M. Bilgin, R. Bangham, D. Hall, A. Casamayor, P. Bertone, N. Lan, R. Jansen, S. Bidlingmaier, T. Houfek, T. Mitchell, P. Miller, R. A. Dean, M. Gerstein, and M. Snyder. 2001. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 293:2101-2105.