Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial length with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 166-170

  Fontes, Beatriz Machado ^a   Fontes, Bruno Machado ^b,c   Castro, Elaine ^c  

^a Centro de Microcirurgia and Diagnóstico   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c Oftalmoclinica Meier   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cataract extraction; Diagnostic techniques, ophthalmological; Intraocular; Lens implantation; Preoperative care; Refractive errors

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMETRY; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81355139495     PISSN: 00042749     EISSN: 16782925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-27492011000300004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Mamalis N. Intraocular lens power accuracy: how are we doing? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(1):1-3. Comment on J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(1):85-8
2. Kora Y, Shimizu K, Yoshida M, Inatomi M, Ozawa T. Intraocular lens power calculation for lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(4):543-8
3. Jin GJ, Crandall AS, Jones JJ. Intraocular lens exchange due to incorrect lens power. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(3):417-24
4. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(5):472-85
5. Narváez J, Zimmerman G, Stulting RD, Chang DH. Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(12):2050-3
6. Prager TC, Hardten DR, Fogal BJ. Enhancing intraocular lens outcome precision: an evaluation of axial length determinations, keratometry, and IOL formulas. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006;19(4):435-48
7. Olsen T, Thorwest M. Calibration of axial length measurements with the Zeiss IOLMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(7):1345-50
8. Olsen T. Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(1):84-7
9. Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(5):552-6
10. Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Drexler W, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Biometry of cataractous eyes using partial coherence interferometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype I. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(2):224-9
11. Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Petternel V, Drexler W, et al. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(2): 230-4
12. Connors R 3rd, Boseman P 3rd, Olson RJ. Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(2):235-8
13. Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOLMaster. A prospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2001;(281):61-5
14. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK. Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28(2): 239-42
15. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(9):765-73
16. Bhatt AB, Schefler AC, Feuer WJ, Yoo SH, Murray TG. Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(7):929-33
17. Remsch H, Kampmeier J, Muche R, Lang GE, Lang GK. [Comparison of the optical coherence method (Zeiss IOL-Master) with two ultrasonographic biometric methods for the calculation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses after phacoemulsification as part of clinical routine]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221(10):837-42. German
18. Gantenbein CP, Ruprecht KW. [Comparison between optical and acoustical biometry]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004;27(10):1121-7. French
19. Siahmed K, Muraine M, Brasseur G. [Optic biometry in intraocular lense calculation for cataract surgery. Comparison with usual methods]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2001;24(9):922-6. French
20. Gantenbein C, Lang HM, Ruprecht KW, Georg T. [First steps with the Zeiss IOLMaster: A comparison between acoustic contact biometry and non-contact optical biometry]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2003;220(5):309-14. German
21. Kutschan A, Wiegand W. [Individual postoperative refraction after cataract surgery-a comparison of optical and acoustical biometry]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221(9):743-8. German
22. Landers J, Goggin M. Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37(6):566-9