Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 126, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 929-933

  Bhatt, Anand B ^a   Schefler, Amy C ^a   Feuer, William J ^a   Yoo, Sonia H ^a   Murray, Timothy G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRY; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ULTRASOUND;

BIOMETRY; CATARACT EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; LIGHT; PSEUDOPHAKIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 47549101615     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 00039950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.7.929     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Gantenbein CP, Ruprecht KW. Comparison between optical and acoustical biometry. J FrOphtalmol. 2004;27(10):1121-1127.
2. Kutschan A. Wiegand W. Individual postoperative refraction after cataract surgery: a comparison of optical and acoustical biometry [in German]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221(9):743-748.
3. Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculation. Eye. 2002;16(5):552-556.
4. Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL Master: a prospective study. Bull Soc Beige Ophtalmol. 2001;(281):61-65.
5. Skorkovská S. Michalek J. Ruberova M, Synek S. Comparison of ultrasound and optical biometry with respect to ocular refraction after cataract surgery. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2004;60(1):24-29.
6. Attas-Fox L. Zadok D, GerberY, et al. Axial length measurement in eyes with diabetic macular edema: A-scan versus lOLMaster. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(8):1499-1504.
7. Ueda T. Taketani F, Ota T, et al. Impact of nuclear cataract density on postoperative refractive outcome: IOL Master versus ultrasound. Ophthalmologica. 2007;221(6):384-387.
8. Ueda T. Nawa Y, Hara Y. Relationship between the retinal thickness of the macula and the difference in axial length. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244(4):498-501.
9. Haigis W. Lege B, Miller N, et al. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(9):765-773.