First steps with the Zeiss IOLMaster®: A comparison between acoustic contact biometry and non-contact optical biometry;Erste erfahrungen mit dem Zeiss-IOL-Master®: Ein vergleich zwischen akustischer kontaktbiometrie und kontaktfreier optischer biometrie

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 220, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 309-314

  Gantenbein, Claude ^a   Lang, Hans Martin ^a   Ruprecht, Klaus W ^a   Georg, Thomas ^b  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biometry; IOL power formulae; Partial coherence laser interferometry; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; REFRACTION INDEX;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMETRY; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0038068829     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39430     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Assouline M, Lebuisson D. La vidéokératoscopie. J Fr Ophtalmol 1999; 22, 2: 241-254
2. Connors R et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28 (2): 235-238
3. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, Kiss B, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Optical biometry in cataract surgery. In: Khonen T (ed): Modern Cataract Surgery. Basel: Karger, 2002; 34: 131-140
4. Giers U, Epple C, Schütte E. Grenzen der IOL-Vorausberechnung: Zur Genauigkeit der A-Scan-Biometrie. Erlangen: Vortrag auf der 2. Tagung der DGII, 4.3.1988
5. Giers U, Thill-Schwanninger M, Epple C. Fehlerquellen bei der Berechnung von intraokularen Linsen. Spektrum Augenheilkd 1989; 3/1: 8-13
6. Giers U, Epple C. Untersuchungen zur Reliabilität ultrasonographischer Biometrien. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1990; 196 (3): 171-178
7. Haigis W. Ultraschall - Biometrie. In: Straub W, Kroll P, Küchle HJ (Hrsg): Augenärztliche Untersuchungsmethoden. Stuttgart: Enke, 1995: 255-304
8. Haigis W. Optische Biometrie als Alternative zur Ultraschallbiometrie. In: Sonderdruck der Ophthalmo-Chirurgie. Heidelberg: Kaden-Verlag, 2000; 12, 3: 75-80
9. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparision of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 238: 765-773
10. Haigis W. Pseudophakic correction factors for optical biometry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001; 239: 589-598
11. Haigis W. Optical Coherence Biometry. In: Khonen T (ed): Modern Cataract Surgery. Basel: Karger, 2002; 34: 119-130
12. Hill WE. Vergleichende Analyse der optischen Biometrie unter Verwendung des Zeiss IOLMaster® und der Ultraschallbiometrie. Zeiss, Jena "white paper"
13. Hitzenberger CK. Optical measurement of the axial eye length by laser Doppler interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32 (3): 616-624
14. Hitzenberger CK et al. Measurement of the axial length of cataract eyes by laser Doppler interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34 (6): 1886-1893
15. Hoffmann PC, Hütz WW, Eckhardt HB. Bedeutung der Formelauswahl für die postoperative Refraktion nach Katarakt-Operation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1997; 211: 168-177
16. Hoffmann PC, Hutz WW, Eckhardt HB, Heuring AH. Intraocular lens calculation and ultrasound biometry: immersion and contact procedures. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1998; 213 (3): 161-165
17. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Ruiz RS, Lewis JW, Rosenthal H. Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculations. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104: 539-541
18. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988; 14: 17-24
19. Kiss B et al. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasability study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28 (2): 230-234
20. Olsen T, Nielsen PJ. Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1989; 67: 101-102
21. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18: 125-129
22. Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye 2002; 16 (5): 552-556
23. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16: 217-225
24. Sampson WG. Applied optical principles: keratometry. Ophthalmology 1979; 86 (3): 347-351
25. Schelenz J, Kammann J. Comparision of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989; 15: 425-442
26. Shammas HJ. A comparision of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement. Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J 1984; 10: 444-447
27. Siahmed K, Muraine M, Brasseur G. Optic biometry in intraocular lens calculation for cataract surgery. Comparision with usual methods. J Fr Ophtalmol 2001; 24 (9): 922-926
28. Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL master. A prospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2001; 281: 61-65
29. Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Pfeiffer N. Reproduzierbarkeit der Messergebnisse bei der optischen Biometrie: Intra- und Interuntersucher - Variabilität. In: Wenzel M, Kohnen T, Blumer B (Hrsg): 14. Kongress der Deutschsprachigen Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen Implantation und refraktive Chirurgie. Köln: Biermann, 2000: 85-91