Calibration of axial length measurements with the Zeiss IOLMaster

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1345-1350

  Olsen, Thomas ^a   Thorwest, Martin ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CATARACT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION INDEX; SCHOOL CHILD; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VISUAL ACUITY; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; CHILD; ECHOGRAPHY; EYE; EYE REFRACTION; LASER; LENS IMPLANT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICS; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PSEUDOPHAKIA; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; CALIBRATION; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LASERS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PSEUDOPHAKIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 24944498768     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.066     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126:524-534
2. Connors R III, Boseman P III, Olson RJ. Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:235-238
3. Haigis W. Pseudophakic correction factors for optical biometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001; 239:589-598
4. Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:230-234
5. Lam AKC, Chan R, Pang PCK. The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster™. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21:477-483
6. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, et al. Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry; outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:239-242
7. Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry; intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:1961-1968
8. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, et al. Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29:1950-1955
9. Eleftheriadis H. IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 960-963
10. Olsen T. The Olsen formula. In: Shammas HJ, ed, Intraocular Lens Power Calculations. Thorofare, NJ, Slack Inc, 2004; 27-38
11. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 238:765-773
12. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18:125-129