Compartmentalization of the nucleus

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 701-708

  Meldi, Lauren ^a   Brickner, Jason H ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAMIN; RNA POLYMERASE II; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CTCF;

ACTIN FILAMENT; BIOGENESIS; CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS INCLUSION BODY; CELL SURVIVAL; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; COILED BODY; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LAMINA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN POLYMORPHISM; REGULATOR GENE; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; X CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES; COILED BODIES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; NUCLEAR MATRIX;

EID: 81355137935     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.08.001     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Thompson M., et al. Nucleolar clustering of dispersed tRNA genes. Science 2003, 302:1399-1401.
2. Cremer T., et al. Chromosome territories - a functional nuclear landscape. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006, 18:307-316.
3. Noordermeer D., et al. Transcription and chromatin organization of a housekeeping gene cluster containing an integrated beta-globin locus control region. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000016.
4. Cremer T., Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2:292-301.
5. Kosak S.T., et al. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 2002, 296:158-162.
6. Reddy K.L., et al. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 2008, 452:243-247.
7. Pickersgill H., et al. Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:1005-1014.
8. Croft J.A., et al. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 145:1119-1131.
9. Mahy N.L., et al. Gene density and transcription influence the localization of chromatin outside of chromosome territories detectable by FISH. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 159:753-763.
10. Marshall W.F., et al. Specific interactions of chromatin with the nuclear envelope: positional determination within the nucleus in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Cell 1996, 7:825-842.
11. Bystricky K., et al. Chromosome looping in yeast: telomere pairing and coordinated movement reflect anchoring efficiency and territorial organization. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 168:375-387.
12. Funabiki H., et al. Cell cycle-dependent specific positioning and clustering of centromeres and telomeres in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 121:961-976.
13. Misteli T. The concept of self-organization in cellular architecture. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155:181-185.
14. Nicodemi M., Prisco A. Thermodynamic pathways to genome spatial organization in the cell nucleus. Biophys. J. 2009, 96:2168-2177.
15. Lieberman-Aiden E., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009, 326:289-293.
16. Mateos-Langerak J., et al. Spatially confined folding of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:3812-3817.
17. O'Sullivan J.M., et al. Gene loops juxtapose promoters and terminators in yeast. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:1014-1018.
18. Simonis M., et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:1348-1354.
19. Bohn M., Heermann D.W. Diffusion-driven looping provides a consistent framework for chromatin organization. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e12218.
20. Palstra R.-J., et al. The beta-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2003, 35:190-194.
21. Tolhuis B., et al. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:1453-1465.
22. Spilianakis C.G., Flavell R.A. Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5:1017-1027.
23. Lee G.R., et al. Hypersensitive site 7 of the TH2 locus control region is essential for expressing TH2 cytokine genes and for long-range intrachromosomal interactions. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6:42-48.
24. Kurukuti S., et al. CTCF binding at the H19 imprinting control region mediates maternally inherited higher-order chromatin conformation to restrict enhancer access to Igf2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:10684-11069.
25. Dekker J., et al. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 2002, 295:1306-1311.
26. Ragoczy T., et al. A genetic analysis of chromosome territory looping: diverse roles for distal regulatory elements. Chromosome Res. 2003, 11:513-525.
27. Chambeyron S., Bickmore W.A. Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:1119-1130.
28. Majumder P., Boss J.M. CTCF controls expression and chromatin architecture of the human major histocompatibility complex class II locus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30:4211-4223.
29. Hadjur S., et al. Cohesins form chromosomal cis-interactions at the developmentally regulated IFNG locus. Nature 2009, 460:410-413.
30. Kagey M.H., et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 2010, 467:430-435.
31. Nativio R., et al. Cohesin is required for higher-order chromatin conformation at the imprinted IGF2-H19 locus. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000739.
32. Bohn M., et al. Random loop model for long polymers. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 2007, 76:051805.
33. Bohn M., Heermann D.W. Topological interactions between ring polymers: Implications for chromatin loops. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132:044904.
34. Guelen L., et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008, 453:948-951.
35. Peric-Hupkes D., et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:603-613.
36. van Bemmel J.G., et al. The insulator protein SU(HW) fine-tunes nuclear lamina interactions of the Drosophila genome. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e15013.
37. Galiova G., et al. Chromatin changes induced by lamin A/C deficiency and the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 87:291-303.
38. Ognibene A., et al. Nuclear changes in a case of X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22:864-869.
39. Scaffidi P., Misteli T. Lamin A-dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science 2006, 312:1059-1063.
40. Kuzmina S., et al. Characterization and fractionation of rat liver nuclear matrix. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1981, 25:225-232.
41. Fey E.G., et al. The nonchromatin substructures of the nucleus: the ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-containing and RNP-depleted matrices analyzed by sequential fractionation and resinless section electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 1986, 102:1654-1665.
42. Fisher P.A., et al. Isolation and characterization of a proteinaceous subnuclear fraction composed of nuclear matrix, peripheral lamina, and nuclear pore complexes from embryos of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell Biol. 1982, 92:674-686.
43. Amati B.B., Gasser S.M. Chromosomal ARS and CEN elements bind specifically to the yeast nuclear scaffold. Cell 1988, 54:967-978.
44. Seo J., et al. Nuclear matrix binding regulates SATB1-mediated transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:24600-24609.
45. Hancock R. A new look at the nuclear matrix. Chromosoma 2000, 109:219-225.
46. Ma H., et al. Association of chromosome territories with the nuclear matrix. Disruption of human chromosome territories correlates with the release of a subset of nuclear matrix proteins. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 146:531-542.
47. Jackson D.A., et al. Visualization of focal sites of transcription within human nuclei. EMBO J. 1993, 12:1059-1065.
48. Wei X., et al. Three-dimensional visualization of transcription sites and their association with splicing factor-rich nuclear speckles. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 146:543-558.
49. Mitchell J.A., Fraser P. Transcription factories are nuclear subcompartments that remain in the absence of transcription. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:20-25.
50. Spector D.L., Lamond A.I. Nuclear speckles. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3. pii: a000646.
51. Palladino F., et al. SIR3 and SIR4 proteins are required for the positioning and integrity of yeast telomeres. Cell 1993, 75:543-555.
52. Bantignies F., et al. Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 2011, 144:214-226.
53. Iborra F.J., et al. Active RNA polymerases are localized within discrete transcription 'factories' in human nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 1996, 109:1427-1436.
54. Sugaya K., et al. Mammalian cell lines expressing functional RNA polymerase II tagged with the green fluorescent protein. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113:2679-2683.
55. Papantonis A., et al. Active RNA polymerases: mobile or immobile molecular machines?. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000419.
56. Hu Q., et al. Enhancing nuclear receptor-induced transcription requires nuclear motor and LSD1-dependent gene networking in interchromatin granules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:19199-191204.
57. Phair R.D., Misteli T. High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. Nature 2000, 404:604-609.
58. Kruhlak M.J., et al. Reduced mobility of the alternate splicing factor (ASF) through the nucleoplasm and steady state speckle compartments. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150:41-51.
59. Shevtsov S.P., Dundr M. Nucleation of nuclear bodies by RNA. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:167-173.
60. Kaiser T.E., et al. De novo formation of a subnuclear body. Science 2008, 322:1713-1717.
61. Platani M., et al. Cajal body dynamics and association with chromatin are ATP-dependent. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:502-508.
62. Gorisch S.M., et al. Nuclear body movement is determined by chromatin accessibility and dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:13221-13226.
63. Muratani M., et al. Metabolic-energy-dependent movement of PML bodies within the mammalian cell nucleus. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:106-110.
64. Dieppois G., et al. Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:7858-7870.
65. Williams R.R., et al. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119:132-140.
66. Brickner J.H., Walter P. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:e342.
67. Chubb J.R., et al. Chromatin motion is constrained by association with nuclear compartments in human cells. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:439-445.
68. Finlan L.E., et al. Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000039.
69. Kumaran R.I., Spector D.L. A genetic locus targeted to the nuclear periphery in living cells maintains its transcriptional competence. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 180:51-65.
70. Zink D., et al. Transcription-dependent spatial arrangements of CFTR and adjacent genes in human cell nuclei. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 166:815-825.
71. Meister P., et al. The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:766-782.
72. Akhtar A., Gasser S.M. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:507-517.
73. Capelson M., et al. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 2010, 140:372-383.
74. Kalverda B., et al. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 2010, 140:360-371.
75. Vaquerizas J.M., et al. Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000846.
76. Ahmed S., et al. DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for targeting genes to the nuclear periphery. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:111-118.
77. Casolari J.M., et al. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004, 117:427-439.
78. Taddei A. Active genes at the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007, 19:305-310.
79. Brickner D.G., et al. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e81.
80. Light W.H., et al. Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes H2A.Z. incorporation and INO1 transcriptional memory. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:112-125.
81. Schmid M., et al. Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:379-391.
82. Mendjan S., et al. Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:811-823.
83. Schoenfelder S., et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat. Genet. 2010, 53-61.
84. Marshall W.F., et al. Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr. Biol. 1997, 7:930-939.
85. Cabal G.G., et al. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 2006, 441:770-773.
86. Berger A.B., et al. High-resolution statistical mapping reveals gene territories in live yeast. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:1031-1037.
87. Gasser S.M. Visualizing chromatin dynamics in interphase nuclei. Science 2002, 296:1412-1416.
88. Chuang C.H., Belmont A.S. Moving chromatin within the interphase nucleus-controlled transitions?. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 18:698-706.
89. Luthra R., et al. Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:3042-3049.
90. Thakar R., Csink A.K. Changing chromatin dynamics and nuclear organization during differentiation in Drosophila larval tissue. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118:951-960.
91. Levi V., et al. Chromatin dynamics in interphase cells revealed by tracking in a two-photon excitation microscope. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:4275-4285.
92. Chuang C.H., et al. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:825-831.