Molecular evolution of candidate sour taste receptor gene PKD1L3 in mammals

Genome

Volumn 54, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 890-897

  Chen, Dazhi ^a   Li, Ping ^a   Guo, Wenhu ^a   Ye, Fang ^b   Wu, Jian ^a   Wei, Damu ^a   Guo, Zhiyun ^a   Ye, Chun ^a   Bell, J ^c  

^a SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Sichuan Peoples' Hospital   (China)

^c NONE

Author keywords

mammalian; molecular evolution; PKD1L3; positive selection

Indexed keywords

CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; ION CHANNEL; PKD1L3 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HUMAN; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RODENT; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; TASTE BUD;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; ION CHANNELS; MAMMALS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; RODENTIA; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TASTE BUDS;

MAMMALIA; RODENTIA;

EID: 80855148877     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/g11-057     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bateman A. Sandford R. 1999. The PLAT domain: a new piece in the PKD1 puzzle. Curr. Biol. 9 (16): R588-R590. 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80380-7 10469604 (Pubitemid 29455997)
2. Benton M.J. Donoghue P.C. 2007. Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (1): 26-53. 10.1093/molbev/msl150 17047029 (Pubitemid 46026279)
3. Bielawski J.P. Dunn K.A. Sabehi G. Beja O. 2004. Darwinian adaptation of proteorhodopsin to different light intensities in the marine environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (41): 14824-14829. 10.1073/pnas.0403999101 15466697 (Pubitemid 39410759)
4. Bishop J.G. 2005. Directed mutagenesis confirms the functional importance of positively selected sites in polygalacturonase inhibitor protein. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (7): 1531-1534. 10.1093/molbev/msi146 15829620 (Pubitemid 40800679)
5. Delmas P. 2005. Polycystins: polymodal receptor/ion-channel cellular sensors. Pflügers Arch. 451 (1): 264-276. 10.1007/s00424-005-1431-5 15889307 (Pubitemid 41424931)
6. Fitzpatrick D.A. McInerney J.O. 2005. Evidence of positive Darwinian selection in Omp85, a highly conserved bacterial outer membrane protein essential for cell viability. J. Mol. Evol. 60 (2): 268-273. 10.1007/s00239-004-0194-5 15785855 (Pubitemid 40568865)
7. Ford M.J. 2002. Applications of selective neutrality tests to molecular ecology. Mol. Ecol. 11 (8): 1245-1262. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01536.x 12144648
8. Garcia-Bailo B. Toguri C. Eny K.M. El-Sohemy A. 2009. Genetic variation in taste and its influence on food selection. OMICS, 13 (1): 69-80. 10.1089/omi.2008.0031 18687042
9. Glazko G.V. Nei M. 2003. Estimation of divergence times for major lineages of primate species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (3): 424-434. 10.1093/molbev/msg050 12644563 (Pubitemid 36427177)
10. Hamm D. Mautz B.S. Wolfner M.F. Aquadro C.F. Swanson W.J. 2007. Evidence of amino acid diversity-enhancing selection within humans and among primates at the candidate sperm-receptor gene PKDREJ. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81 (1): 44-52. 10.1086/518695 17564962 (Pubitemid 47001155)
11. Horio N. Yoshida R. Yasumatsu K. Yanagawa Y. Ishimaru Y. Matsunami H. Ninomiya Y. 2011. Sour taste responses in mice lacking PKD channels. PLoS ONE, 6 (5): e20007. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020007 21625513
12. Hurst L.D. 2002. The Ka / Ks ratio: diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet. 18 (9): 486-487. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02722-1 12175810
13. Inada H. Kawabata F. Ishimaru Y. Fushiki T. Matsunami H. Tominaga M. 2008. Off-response property of an acid-activated cation channel complex PKD1L3-PKD2L1. EMBO Rep. 9 (7): 690-697. 10.1038/embor.2008.89 18535624 (Pubitemid 351927691)
14. Ishii S. Misaka T. Kishi M. Kaga T. Ishimaru Y. Abe K. 2009. Acetic acid activates PKD1L3-PKD2L1 channel a candidate sour taste receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 385 (3): 346-350. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.05.069 19464260
15. Ishimaru Y. Katano Y. Yamamoto K. Akiba M. Misaka T. Roberts R.W. et al. 2010. Interaction between PKD1L3 and PKD2L1 through their transmembrane domains is required for localization of PKD2L1 at taste pores in taste cells of circumvallate and foliate papillae. FASEB J. 24 (10): 4058-4067. 10.1096/fj.10-162925 20538909
16. Ivarsson Y. Mackey A.J. Edalat M. Pearson W.R. Mannervik B. 2003. Identification of residues in glutathione transferase capable of driving functional diversification in evolution. A novel approach to protein redesign. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (10): 8733-8738. 10.1074/jbc.M211776200 12486119 (Pubitemid 36800630)
17. Kumnovics A. Levin G. Blount P. 2002. Family ties of gated pores: evolution of the sensor module. FASEB J. 16 (12): 1623-1629. 10.1096/fj.02-0238hyp 12374785 (Pubitemid 35154645)
18. Li A. Tian X. Sung S.W. Somlo S. 2003. Identification of two novel polycystic kidney disease-1-like genes in human and mouse genomes. Genomics, 81 (6): 596-608. 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00048-X 12782129 (Pubitemid 36637015)
19. Liu H.-L. Wang Y.-Q. Liao C.-H. Kuang Y.-Q. Zheng Y.-T. Su B. 2005. Adaptive evolution of primate TRIM5, a gene restricting HIV-1 infection. Gene, 362: 109-116. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.06.045 16226405 (Pubitemid 41711190)
20. LopezJimenez N.D. Cavenagh M.M. Sainz E. Cruz-Ithier M.A. Battey J.F. Sullivan S.L. 2006. Two members of the TRPP family of ion channels, Pkd1l3 and Pkd2l1, are co-expressed in a subset of taste receptor cells. J. Neurochem. 98 (1): 68-77. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03842.x 16805797 (Pubitemid 43882933)
21. Miyamoto T. Fujiyama R. Okada Y. Sato T. 2000. Acid and salt responses in mouse taste cells. Prog. Neurobiol. 62 (2): 135-157. 10.1016/S0301-0082(99) 00072-6 10828381 (Pubitemid 30316443)
22. Nelson T.M. LopezJimenez N.D. Tessarollo L. Inoue M. Bachmanov A.A. Sullivan S.L. 2010. Taste function in mice with a targeted mutation of the Pkd1l3 gene. Chem. Senses, 35 (7): 565-577. 10.1093/chemse/bjq070 20605874
23. Nielsen R. 2005. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39 (1): 197-218. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420 16285858 (Pubitemid 43011113)
24. Padhi A. Verghese B. Otta S.K. Varghese B. Ramu K. 2007. Positive Darwinian selection on crustacean hyperglycemic hormone (CHH) of the green shore crab, Carcinus maenas. In Silico Biol. 7 (4-5): 355-367. 18391229 (Pubitemid 351217182)
25. Pedersen S.F. Owsianik G. Nilius B. 2005. TRP channels: an overview. Cell Calcium, 38 (3-4): 233-252. 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.028 16098585 (Pubitemid 41283262)
26. Pin J.P. Galvez T. Prezeau L. 2003. Evolution, structure, and activation mechanism of family 3/C G-protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol. Ther. 98 (3): 325-354. 10.1016/S0163-7258(03)00038-X 12782243 (Pubitemid 36638547)
27. Podlaha O. Zhang J. 2003. Positive selection on protein-length in the evolution of a primate sperm ion channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (21): 12241-12246. 10.1073/pnas.2033555100 14523237 (Pubitemid 37271545)
28. Richter T.A. Dvoryanchikov G.A. Roper S.D. Chaudhari N. 2004. Acid-sensing ion channel-2 is not necessary for sour taste in mice. J. Neurosci. 24 (16): 4088-4091. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0653-04.2004 15102924 (Pubitemid 38544235)
29. Rossetti S. Strmecki L. Gamble V. Burton S. Sneddon V. Peral B. et al. 2001. Mutation analysis of the entire PKD1 gene: genetic and diagnostic implications. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68 (1): 46-63. 10.1086/316939 11115377 (Pubitemid 32048361)
30. Rozas J. Snchez-DelBarrio J.C. Messeguer X. Rozas R. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics, 19 (18): 2496-2497. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359 14668244 (Pubitemid 38016658)
31. Sawyer S.L. Wu L.I. Emerman M. Malik H.S. 2005. Positive selection of primate TRIM5 identifies a critical species-specific retroviral restriction domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 (8): 2832-2837. 10.1073/pnas. 0409853102 15689398 (Pubitemid 40299877)
32. Shi P. Zhang J. 2006. Contrasting modes of evolution between vertebrate sweet/umami receptor genes and bitter receptor genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 (2): 292-300. 10.1093/molbev/msj028 16207936 (Pubitemid 43100043)
33. Stevens D.R. Seifert R. Bufe B. Müller F. Kremmer E. Gauss R. et al. 2001. Hyperpolarization-activated channels HCN1 and HCN4 mediate responses to sour stimuli. Nature, 413 (6856): 631-635. 10.1038/35098087 11675786 (Pubitemid 32964062)
34. Tamura K. Dudley J. Nei M. Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (8): 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092 17488738 (Pubitemid 47236692)
35. Vallender E.J. Lahn B.T. 2004. Positive selection on the human genome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13 (Suppl. 2): R245-R254. 10.1093/hmg/ddh253 15358731 (Pubitemid 39359909)
36. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (8): 1586-1591. 10.1093/molbev/msm088 17483113 (Pubitemid 47236688)
37. Yang Z. Wong W.S. Nielsen R. 2005. Bayes empirical Bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (4): 1107-1118. 10.1093/molbev/msi097 15689528 (Pubitemid 40471423)
38. Ye C. Sun H. Guo W. Wei Y. Zhou Q. 2009. Molecular evolution of PKD2 gene family in mammals. Genetica, 137 (1): 77-86. 10.1007/s10709-009-9352-4 19184643
39. Zhang J. Nielsen R. Yang Z. 2005. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (12): 2472-2479. 10.1093/molbev/msi237 16107592 (Pubitemid 41661383)