Genome-wide association mapping of agronomic traits in sugar beet

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 123, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1121-1131

  Würschum, Tobias ^a   Maurer, Hans Peter ^a   Kraft, Thomas ^b   Janssen, Geert ^b   Nilsson, Carolina ^b   Reif, Jochen Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b Syngenta Seeds AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMIC TRAITS; ASSOCIATION MAPPING; COMPLEX TRAITS; EFFECT SIZE; EPISTATIC INTERACTIONS; GENETIC ARCHITECTURE; GENETIC DISTANCES; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; LARGE POPULATION; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MAIN EFFECT; MASTER REGULATORS; MATRIX; MIXED MODELS; PLANT BREEDING; POPULATION STRUCTURES; SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM MARKERS;

AGRONOMY; GENES; MAPPING; SUGAR BEETS;

SUGARS;

ARTICLE; BEET; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME MAP; CROSS BREEDING; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

BETA VULGARIS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

EID: 80855148170     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-011-1653-1     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Astle W, Balding DJ (2009) Population structure and cryptic relatedness in genetic association studies. Stat Sci 24: 451-471.
2. Barett JC, Cardon LR (2006) Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38: 659-662.
3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 57: 289-300.
4. Bernardo R (1993) Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize. Theor Appl Genet 85: 1055-1062.
5. Carlborg Ö, Haley CS (2004) Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 5: 618-625.
6. Cockram J, White J, Zuluaga DL, Smith D, Comadran J et al (2010) Genome-wide association mapping to candidate polymorphism resolution in the unsequenced barley genome. PNAS 107: 21611-21616.
7. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED et al (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425-431.
8. Draycott AP (2006) Sugar beet, 1st edn. Blackwell, Oxford.
9. Ersoz ES, Yu J, Buckler ES (2007) Application of linkage disequilibrium and association mapping in crop plants. Genomics-assisted crop improvement: genomics approaches and platforms, vol 1, pp 97-119.
10. Flint-Garcia SA, Thornsberry JM, Buckler ES (2003) Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 357-374.
11. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ASReml user. Guide Release 2. 0 VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
12. Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325-338.
13. He X, Qian W, Wang Z, Li Y, Zhang J (2010) Prevalent positive epistasis in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic networks. Nat Genet 42: 272-276.
14. Hill WG, Robertson A (1968) Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet 38: 226-231.
15. Kraakman ATW, Niks RE, van den Berg PMMM, Stam P, van Eeuwijk FA (2004) Linkage disequilibrium mapping of yield and yield stability in modern spring barley cultivars. Genetics 168: 435-446.
16. Li L, Paulo MJ, van Eeuwijk F, Gebhardt C (2010) Statistical epistasis between candidate gene alleles for complex tuber traits in an association mapping population of tetraploid potato. Theor Appl Genet 121: 1303-1310.
17. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland.
18. Maurer HP, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2008) Population genetic simulation and data analysis with Plabsoft. Euphytica 161: 133-139.
19. Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Schön CC (1998) Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and larger bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics 149: 383-403.
20. Miedaner T, Würschum T, Maurer HP, Korzun V, Ebmeyer E, Reif JC (2010) Association mapping for Fusarium head blight resistance in soft European winter wheat. Mol Breed. doi: 10. 1007/011032-010-9516-Z.
21. Müller BU, Stich B, Piepho HP (2010) A general method for controlling the genome-wide type I error rate in linkage and association mapping experiments in plants. Heredity 106: 825-831.
22. Myles S, Peiffer J, Brown PJ, Ersoz ES, Zhang Z et al (2009) Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design. Plant Cell 21: 2194-2202.
23. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA et al (2006) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38: 904-909.
24. Reif JC, Liu W, Gowda M, Maurer HP, Möhring J et al (2010) Genetic basis of agronomically important traits in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) investigated with joint linkage association mapping. Theor Appl Genet 8: 1489-1495.
25. Reif JC, Maurer HP, Korzun V, Ebmeyer E, Miedaner T, Würschum T (2011a) Mapping QTLs with main and epistatic effects underlying grain yield and heading time in soft winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet. doi: 10. 1007/s00122-011-1583-y.
26. Reif JC, Gowda M, Maurer HP, Longin CFH, Korzun V et al (2011b) Association mapping for quality traits in soft winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet 122: 961-970.
27. Schneider K, Schäfer-Pregl R, Borchardt C, Salamini F (2002) Mapping QTLs for sucrose content, yield and quality in a sugar beet population fingerprinted by EST-related markers. Theor Appl Genet 104: 1107-1113.
28. St Onge RP, Mani R, Oh J, Proctor M, Fung E et al (2007) Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions. Nat Genet 39: 199-206.
29. Stich B, Melchinger AE, Heckenberger M, Möhring J, Schechert A et al (2008) Association mapping in multiple segregating populations of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 117: 1167-1179.
30. Stram DO, Lee JW (1994) Variance components testing in longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50: 1171-1177.
31. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H et al (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808-813.
32. Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Schön CC (2000) Bias and sampling error of the estimated proportion of genotypic variance explained by quantitative trait loci determined from experimental data in maize using cross validation and validation with independent samples. Genetics 154: 1839-1849.
33. van Inghelandt D et al (2010) Extent and genome-wide distribution of linkage disequilibrium in commercial maize germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 123: 11-20.
34. Weber WE, Borchardt DC, Koch G (1999) Combined linkage maps and QTLs in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) from different populations. Plant Breed 118: 193-204.
35. Weber WE, Borchardt DC, Koch G (2000) Marker analysis for quantitative traits in sugar beet. Plant Breed 119: 97-106.
36. Weir BS (1996) Genetic data analysis II, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
37. Wright S (1978) Evolution and genetics of populations, variability within and among natural populations, vol 4. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 91.
38. Würschum T, Maurer HP, Schulz B, Möhring J, Reif JC (2011) Genome-wide association mapping reveals epistasis and genetic interaction networks in sugar beet. Theor Appl Genet 123: 109-118.
39. Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Vroh Bi I, Yamasaki M et al (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet 38: 203-208.
40. Zhao K, Aranzana MJ, Kim S, Lister C, Shindo C et al (2007) An Arabidopsis example of association mapping in structured samples. PLoS Genet 3: e4.