Where does a flock end from an information perspective? A comparative experiment with live and robotic birds

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1304-1311

  Fernández Juricic, Esteban ^a   Kowalski, Victor ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

antipredator behavior; collective detection; predator detection; social information; vigilance; visual acuity

Indexed keywords

BIRD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GROUP BEHAVIOR; PREDATOR; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; VIGILANCE; VISUAL CUE;

ANIMALIA; AVES; CARPODACUS MEXICANUS; MOLOTHRUS ATER; STURNUS VULGARIS;

EID: 80455167955     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr132     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bahr DB, Bekoff M. 1999. Predicting flock vigilance from simple passerine interactions: modelling with cellular automata. Anim Behav. 58:831-839.
2. Balsby TJS, Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB. 2003. Degradation of whitethroat vocalisations: implications for song flight and communication network activities. Behaviour. 140:695-719.
3. Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD. 2007. False alarms and the evolution of antipredator vigilance. Anim Behav. 74:1199-1206.
4. Bednekoff PA, Lima SL. 1998. Re-examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviour. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 265:2021-2026.
5. Bednekoff PA, Lima SL. 2005. Testing for peripheral vigilance: do birds value what they see when not overtly vigilant? Anim Behav. 69:1165-1171.
6. Blumstein DT, Daniel JC. 2007. Quantifying behavior the JWatcher way. Sunderland (UK): Sinauer Associates Inc.
7. Blumstein DT, Fernandez-Juricic E, Zollner PA, Garity SC. 2005. Interspecific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. J Appl Ecol. 42:943-953.
8. Burton RF. 2008. The scaling of eye size in adult birds: relationship to brain, head and body sizes. Vision Res. 48:2345-2351.
9. Cresswell W, Hilton GM, Ruxton GD. 2000. Evidence for a rule governing the avoidance of superfluous escape flights. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 270:1069-1076.
10. Davis JM. 1975. Socially induced flight reactions in pigeons. Anim Behav. 23:597-601.
11. Dehn MM. 1990. Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 26:337-342.
12. Devereux CL, Whittingham MJ, Fernandez-Juricic E, Vickery JA, Krebs JR. 2006. Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk. Behav Ecol. 17:303-309.
13. Dolan T, Fernandez-Juricic E. 2010. Retinal ganglion cell topography of five species of ground foraging birds. Brain Behav Evol. 75:111-121.
14. Elgar MA, Burren PJ, Posen M. 1984. Vigilance and perception of flock size in foraging house sparrows (Passer domesticus L.). Behaviour. 90:215-223.
15. Fairbanks B, Dobson FS. 2007. Mechanisms of the group-size effect on vigilance in Columbian ground squirrels: dilution versus detection. Anim Behav. 73:115-123.
16. Fernandez-Juricic E, Beauchamp G. 2008. An experimental analysis of spatial position effects on foraging and vigilance in brown-headed cowbird flocks. Ethology. 114:105-114.
17. Fernandez-JuricicE,DelgadoSaezJA,RemachaC,JimenezMD,GarciaV,Hori K.2009.Canasolitaryavianspeciesusecollectivedetection? Anassayinseminaturalconditions.BehavProcess.82:67-74.
18. Fernandez-Juricic E, Gilak N, McDonald JC, Pithia P, Valcarcel A. 2006. A dynamic method to study the transmission of social foraging information in flocks using robots. Anim Behav. 71:901-911.
19. Fernandez-Juricic E, Kacelnik A. 2004. Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effects of quantity and quality of social information at different neighbour distances. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 55:502-511.
20. Fernandez-Juricic E, Schroeder N. 2003. Do variations in scanning behavior affect tolerance to human disturbance? Appl Anim Behav Sci. 84:219-234.
21. Fernandez-Juricic E, Siller S, Kacelnik A. 2004. Flock density, social foraging and scanning: an experiment with starlings. Behav Ecol. 15:371-379.
22. Ferrari MCO, Wisenden BD, Chivers DP. 2010. Chemical ecology of predator-prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool. 88:698-724.
23. FitzGibbon CD. 1989. A cost to individuals with reduced vigilance in groups of Thomsons gazelles hunted by cheetahs. Anim Behav. 37:508-510.
24. Hart A, Lendrem DW. 1984. Vigilance and scanning patterns in birds. Anim Behav. 32:1216-1224.
25. Hilton GH, Cresswell W, Ruxton GD. 1999. Intraflock variation in the speed of escape-flight response on attack by an avian predator. Behav Ecol. 10:391-395.
26. Howland HC, Merola S, Basarab JR. 2004. The allometry and scaling of the size of vertebrate eyes. Vision Res. 44:2043-2065.
27. Jackson AW, Ruxton GD. 2006. Toward an individual-level understanding of vigilance: the role of social information. Behav Ecol. 17:532-538.
28. Jones KA, Krebs JR, Whittingham MJ. 2007. Vigilance in the third dimension: head movement not scan duration varies in response to different predator models. Anim Behav. 74:1181-1187.
29. Kiltie RA. 2000. Scaling of visual acuity with body size in mammals and birds. Funct Ecol. 14:226-234.
30. Krause J, Ruxton GD. 2002. Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Lazarus J. 1979. The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive quelea. Anim Behav. 27:855-865.
32. Lima SL. 1987. Vigilance while feeding and its relation to the risk of predation. J Theor Biol. 124:303-316.
33. Lima SL. 1994a. Collective detection of predatory attack by birds in the absence of alarm signals. J Avian Biol. 25:319-326.
34. Lima SL. 1994b. On the personal benefits of anti-predatory vigilance. Anim Behav. 48:734-736.
35. Lima SL. 1995a. Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group size effect. Anim Behav. 49:11-20.
36. Lima SL. 1995b. Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers: fraught with ambiguity? Anim Behav. 50:1097-1108.
37. Lima SL, Zollner PA. 1996. Anti-predatory vigilance and the limits to collective detection: visual and spatial separation between foragers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38:355-363.
38. Møller AP, Erritzøe J. 2010. Flight distance and eye size in birds. Ethology. 116:458-465.
39. Patricelli G. 2010. Robotics in the study of animal behavior. In: Breed MD, Moore J, editors. Encyclopedia of animal behavior. Oxford: Academic Press. p. 91-99.
40. Powell GVN. 1974. Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging. Anim Behav. 22:501-505.
41. Pöysä H. 1994. Group foraging, distance to cover and vigilance in the teal, Anas crecca. Anim Behav. 48:921-928.
42. Proctor CJ, Broom M, Ruxton GD. 2001. Modelling antipredator vigilance and flight response in group foragers when warning signals are ambiguous. J Theor Biol. 211:409-417.
43. Proctor CJ, Broom M, Ruxton GD. 2003. A communication-based spatial model of antipredator vigilance. J Theor Biol. 220:123-137.
44. Proctor CJ, Broom M, Ruxton GD. 2006. Antipredator vigilance in birds: modeling the edge effect. Math Biosci. 199:79-96.
45. Pulliam HR. 1973. On the advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol. 38:419-422.
46. Pulliam HR, Pyke GH, Caraco T. 1982. The scanning behavior of juncos: a game-theoretical approach. J Theor Biol. 95:89-103.
47. Quinn JL, Cresswell W. 2005. Escape response delays in wintering redshank, Tringa tetanus, flocks: perceptual limits and economic decisions. Anim Behav. 69:1285-1292.
48. Roberts G. 1996. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim Behav. 51:1077-1086.
49. Roberts G. 1997. How many birds does it take to put a flock to flight? Anim Behav. 54:1517-1522.
50. Rolando A, Caldoni R, De Sanctis A, Laiolo P. 2001. Vigilance and neighbour distance in foraging flocks of red-billed choughs, Pyrrhocorax phyrrocorax. J Zool. 253:225-232.
51. Roth TC 2nd, Cox JG, Lima SL. 2008. The use and transfer of information about predation risk in flocks of wintering finches. Ethology. 114:1218-1226.
52. Ruxton GD. 1996. Group size and antipredator vigilance: a simple model requiring limited monitoring of other group members. Anim Behav. 51:478-481.
53. Sirot E. 2006. Social information, antipredatory vigilance and flight in bird flocks. Anim Behav. 72:373-382.
54. Sirot E, Touzalin F. 2009. Coordination and synchronization of vigilance in groups of prey: the role of collective detection and predators preference for stragglers. Am Nat. 173:47-59.
55. StatSoft Inc. 2010. Electronic statistics textbook[Internet]. Tulsa (OK): StatSoft. Available from: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/.
56. Tisdale V, Fernandez-Juricic E. 2009. Vigilance and predator detection vary between avian species with different visual acuity and coverage. Behav Ecol. 20:936-945.
57. Ward AJW, Mehner T. 2010. Multimodal mixed messages: the use of multiple cues allows greater accuracy in social recognition and predator detection decisions in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Behav Ecol. 21:1315-1320.
58. Williamson P, Gray L. 1975. Foraging behaviour of the Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) in Maryland. Condor. 77:84-89.
59. Whitehead SC. 1994. Foraging behaviour and habitat use in the European Starling, Sturnus vulgaris, in an agricultural environment. [DPhil. thesis]. University of Oxford, UK.