Flock density, social foraging, and scanning: An experiment with starlings

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 371-379

  Fernández Juricic, Esteban ^a,b   Siller, Steven ^a   Kacelnik, Alex ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conspecific scanning; Flock density; Neighbor distance; Social foraging; Starlings; Sturnus vulgaris; Vigilance

Indexed keywords

BIRD; CONSPECIFIC; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; POPULATION DENSITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

AVES; STURNIDAE; STURNUS; STURNUS VULGARIS;

EID: 1642410692     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh017     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Beauchamp G, 1998. The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birds. Biol Rev 73:449-472.
2. Beauchamp G, Livoreil B, 1997. The effect of group size on vigilance and feeding rate in spice finches (Lonchura punctulata). Can J Zool 75:1526-1531.
3. Bednekoff PA, Lima SL, 1998a. Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance. Trends Ecol Evol 13:284-287.
4. Bednekoff PA, Lima SL, 1998b. Re-examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:2021-2026.
5. Bekoff M, 1995. Vigilance, flock size, and flock geometry: information gathering by western evening grosbeaks (Aves, Fringillidae). Ethology 99:150-161.
6. Bekoff M, 1996. Cognitive ethology, vigilance, information gathering, and representation: who might know what and why? Behav Process 35:225-237.
7. Bertram BCR, 1980. Viglance and group size in ostriches. Anim Behav 28:278-286.
8. Caraco T, 1979. Time budgeting and group size: a test of theory. Ecology 60:618-627.
9. Catterall, CP, Elgar MA, Kikkawa J, 1992. Vigilance does not covary with group size in an island population of silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Behav Ecol 3:207-210.
10. Clark CW, Mangel M, 1986. The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Popul Biol 3:45-75.
11. Coolen I, Giraldeau L-A, Lavoie M, 2001. Head position as an indicator of producer and scrounger tactics in a ground feeding bird. Anim Behav 61:895-903.
12. Dawkins MS, 1995. How do hens view other hens? The use of lateral and binocular visual fields in social recognition. Behaviour 132:591-606.
13. Dawkins MS, 2002. What are birds looking at? Head movements and eye use in chickens. Anim Behav 63:991-998.
14. Deneubourg JL, Goss S, 1989. Collective patterns and decision-making. Ethol Ecol Evol 1:295-311.
15. Elcavage P, Caraco T, 1983. Vigilance behaviour in House Sparrow flocks. Anim Behav 31:303-312.
16. Elgar MA, 1989. Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: A critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13-33.
17. Elgar MA, Burren PJ, Posen M, 1984. Vigilance and perception of flock size in foraging house sparrows (Passer domesticus L.). Behaviour 90:215-223.
18. Erichsen JT, 1979. How birds look at objects (PhD thesis). Oxford: University of Oxford.
19. Fernández GJ, Capurro AF, Reboreda JC, 2003. Vigilance and group size in greater rheas: individual and collective detection effects. Ethology 109:413-425.
20. Fretwell SD, Lucas JHJ, 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16-36.
21. Giraldeau L-A, Caraco T, 2000. Social foraging theory. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
22. Giraldeau L-A, Lefebvre L, 1986. Exchangeable producer and scrounger roles in a captive flock of feral pigeons: a case for the skill pool effect. Anim Behav 34:797-803.
23. Goss-Custard JD, Cayford JT, Lea SG, 1999. Vigilance during food handling by Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus reduces the chances of losing prey to kleptoparasites. Ibis 141:368-376.
24. Green PA, 1998. Head orientation and trajectory of locomotion during jumping and walking in domestic chicks. Brain Behav Evol 51:48-58.
25. Hart A, Lendrem DW, 1984. Vigilance and scanning patterns in birds. Anim Behav 32:1216-1224.
26. Kacelnik A, Krebs JR, Bernstein C, 1992. The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends Ecol Evol 7:50-5.
27. Krause J, Ruxton GD, 2002. Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Land MF, 1999. The roles of head movement in the search and capture strategy of a tern (Aves, Laridae). J Comp Physiol A 184:265-272.
29. Lima SL, Bednekoff PA, 1999. Back to the basis of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? Anim Behav 58:537-543.
30. Lima SL, Zollner PA, 1996. Anti-predatory vigilance and the limits of collective detection: visual and spatial separation between foragers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:355-363.
31. Martin FR, Katzir G, 1999. Visual fields in short-toed eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds. Brain Behav Evol 53:55-66.
32. Martin GR, 1986. The eye of a passeriform bird, the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris): eye movement amplitude, visual fields and schematic optics. J Comp Physiol A 159:545-557.
33. McNamara JM, Houston AI, 1992. Evolutionary stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size. Anim Behav 43:641-658.
34. Metcalfe NB, 1984. The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: is visibility important? Anim Behav 32:981-985.
35. Metz KJ, Prior KA, Mallory M, 1991. Do cattle egrets gain information from conspecifics when foraging? Oecologia 86:57-61.
36. Myers JL, Well AD, 1995. Research design and statistical analysis. Rahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Olsson O, Bruun M, Smith HG, 2002. Starling foraging success in relation to agricultural land-use. Ecography 25:363-372.
38. Powell GVN, 1974. Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging. Anim Behav 22:501-505.
39. Pöysä H, 1987. Feeding-vigilance trade-off in the teal (Anas crecca): effects of feeding method and predation risk. Behaviour 103:108-122.
40. Pöysä H, 1994. Group foraging, distance to cover and vigilance in the teal, Anas crecca. Anim Behav 48:921-928.
41. Pratt DW, 1982. Saccadic eye movements are coordinated with head movements in walking chickens. J Exp Biol 97:217-223.
42. Quenette P-Y, Gerard J-F, 1992. From individual to collective vigilance in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Can J Zool 70:1632-1635.
43. Roberts SC, 1988. Social influences on vigilance in rabbits. Anim Behav 36:905-913.
44. Roberts G, 1996. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim Behav 51:1077-1086.
45. Rolando A, Caldoni R, De-Sanctis A, Laiolo P, 2001. Vigilance and neighbor distance in foraging flocks of red-billed choughs, Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax. J Zool 253:225-232.
46. Smith JW, Benkman CW, Coffey K, 1999. The use and misuse of public information by foraging red crossbills. Behav Ecol 10:54-62.
47. Smith R, 2002. Together for better or worse: why starlings forage in groups (PhD thesis). Oxford: University of Oxford.
48. Stillman RA, Caldow RWG, Goss-Custard JD, Alexander MJ, 2000. Individual variation in intake rate: the relative importance of foraging efficiency and dominance. J Anim Ecol 69:484-493.
49. Sutherland WJ, 1996. From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Templeton JJ, Giraldeau L-A, 1995. Patch assessment in foraging flocks of european starlings - evidence for the use of public information. Behav Ecol 6:65-72.
51. Templeton JJ, Giraldeau L-A, 1996. Vicarious sampling: The use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:105-114.
52. Tinbergen JM, 1981. Foraging decisions in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris L.). Ardea 69:1-67.
53. Tregenza T, 1995. Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv Ecol Res 26:253-307.
54. Treves A, 2000. Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation. Anim Behav 60:711-722.
55. Vásquez RA, Kacelnik A, 2000. Foraging rate versus sociality in the starling Sturnus vulgaris. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:157-164.
56. Valone TJ, 1989. Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation. Oikos 56:357-363.
57. Valone TJ, Wheelbarger AJ, 1998. The effect of heterospecifics on the group-size effect in white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys). Bird Behav 12:85-90.
58. Ward P, 1985. Why birds in flocks do not coordinate their vigilance periods. J Theor Biol 114:383-385.
59. Whitehead SC, 1994. Foraging behaviour and habitat use in the European starling, Sturnus vulgaris, in an agricultural environment (PhD thesis). Oxford: University of Oxford.
60. Whitehead SC, Wright J, Cotton PA, 1995. Winter field use by the European starling Sturnus vulgaris: habitat preferences and the availability of prey. J Avian Biol 26:193-202.