Coordination and synchronization of vigilance in groups of prey: The role of collective detection and predators' preference for stragglers

American Naturalist

Volumn 173, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 47-59

  Sirot, Etienne ^a,c   Touzalin, Frédéric ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b École Nationale de Formation Agronomique   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Antipredatory vigilance; Cellular automata; Collective detection; Coordination; Risk dilution; Synchronization

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FEEDING; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; TIME ALLOCATION; VIGILANCE;

ANIMAL; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; PREDATION; TIME;

ANIMALS; AROUSAL; EVOLUTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 58749109277     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/593358     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bahr, D. B., and M. Bekoff. 1999. Predicting flock vigilance from simple passerine interactions: modelling with cellular automata. Animal Behaviour 58:831-839.
2. Beauchamp, G. 1998. The effects of group size on mean food intake rate in birds. Biological Reviews 73:449-472.
3. -. 2002. Little evidence for visual monitoring of vigilance in zebra finches. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:1634-1637.
4. -. 2007. Vigilance in a selfish herd. Animal Behaviour 73:445-451.
5. Bednekoff, P. A. 1997. Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game. American Naturalist 150:373-392.
6. Bednekoff, P. A., and S. L. Lima. 1998a. Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:284-287.
7. -. 1998b. Re-examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 265:2021-2026.
8. Bednekoff, P. A., and R. Ritter. 1994. Vigilance in Nxai Pan springbok Antidorcas marsupialis. Behaviour 129:1-11.
9. Bekoff, M. 1995. Vigilance, flock size and flock geometry: information gathering by western evening grosbeaks (Aves, Fringillidae). Ethology 99:150-161.
10. Bertram, B. C. R. 1980. Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Animal Behaviour 28:278-286.
11. Bivand R., with contributions by L. Anselin, O. Berke, A. Bernat, M. Carvalho, Y. Chun, C. Dormann, S. Dray, et al. 2007. spdep: spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package. Version 0.4-7. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spdep/index.html.
12. Box, G. E. P., and D. R. Cox 1964. An analysis of transformations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 26:211-252.
13. Box, G. E. P., and G. Jenkins. 1976. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco.
14. Burns, P. J. 2002. Robustness of the Ljung-Box test and its rank equivalent. http://ssrn.com/abstract=443560.
15. Caraco, T., and M. C. Bayham. 1982. Some geometric aspects of house sparrow flocks. Animal Behaviour 30:990-996.
16. Cliff, A. D., and J. K. Ord. 1981. Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, London.
17. Cresswell, W. 1994. Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa totanus. Animal Behaviour 47:433-442.
18. Cresswell, W., G. M. Hilton, and G. D. Ruxton. 2000. Evidence for a rule governing the avoidance of superfluous escape flights. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267:733-737.
19. Ebensperger, L. A., M. J. Hurtado, and R. Ramos-Jiliberto. 2006. Vigilance and collective detection of predators in Degus (Octogon degus). Ethology 112:879-887.
20. Elgar, M. A. 1989. Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds. Biological Reviews 64:13-33.
21. Fernández-Juricic, E., and G. Beauchamp. 2008. An experimental analysis of spatial position effects on foraging and vigilance in brown-headed cowbird flocks. Ethology 114:105-114.
22. Fernández-Juricic, E., and A. Kacelnik. 2004. Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effect of quality and quantity of social information at different neighbor distances. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:502-511.
23. Fernández, G. J., A. F. Capurro, and J. C. Reboreda. 2003. Effect of group size on individual and collective vigilance in greater rheas. Ethology 109:413-425.
24. Fernández-Juricic, E., S. Siller, and A. Kacelnik. 2004a. Flock density, social foraging: an experiment with starlings. Behavioral Ecology 15:371-379.
25. Fernández-Juricic, E., B. Kerr, P. A. Bednekoff, and D. W. Stephens. 2004b. When are two heads better than one? visual perception and information transfer effect vigilance coordination in foraging groups. Behavioral Ecology 15:898-906.
26. Fernández-Juricic, E., R. Smith, and A. Kacelnik. 2005. Increasing the cost of conspecific scanning in socially foraging starlings affects vigilance and foraging behaviour. Animal Behaviour 69:73-81.
27. Fernández-Juricic, E., G. Beauchamp, and B. Bastain. 2007. Group-size and distance-to-neighbor effects on feeding and vigilance in brown-headed cowbirds. Animal Behaviour 73:771-778.
28. Foster, W. A., and J. E. Treherne. 1981. Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293:466-467.
29. Hilton, G. M., W. Cresswell, and G. D. Ruxton. 1999. Intra-flock variation in the speed of response on an attack by an avian predator. Behavioral Ecology 10:391-395.
30. Jackson, A. L., and G. D. Ruxton. 2006. Towards an individual-level understanding of vigilance: the role of social information. Behavioral Ecology 17:532-538.
31. Jackson, A. L., G. Beauchamp, M. Broom, and G. D. Ruxton. 2006. Evolution of anti-predator traits in response to a flexible targeting strategy by predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:1055-1062.
32. Krause, J., and G. D. Ruxton. 2002. Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33. Lazarus, J. 1979. The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive quelea. Animal Behaviour 27:855-865.
34. Legendre, P., and M.-J. Fortin. 1989. Spatial patterns and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107-138.
35. Lima, S. L. 1994. On the personal benefits of anti-predatory vigilance. Animal Behaviour 48:734-736.
36. -. 1995a. Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group size effect. Animal Behaviour 49:11-20.
37. -. 1995b. Collective detection of predatory attacks by social foragers: fraught with ambiguity? Animal Behaviour 50:1097-1108.
38. Lima, S. L., and P. A. Zollner. 1996. Anti-predatory vigilance and the limits to collective detection: visual and spatial separation between foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38:355-363.
39. Ljung, G. M., and G. E. P. Box. 1978. On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65:553-564.
40. McNamara, J. M., and A. I. Houston. 1992. Evolutionarily stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size. Animal Behaviour 43:641-658.
41. Moran, P. A. P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17-23.
42. Packer, C., and P. Abrams. 1990. Should co-operative groups be more vigilant than selfish groups? Journal of Theoretical Biology 142:341-357.
43. Pays, O., P. J. Jarman, P. Loisel, and J.-F. Gerard. 2007a. Coordination, independence or synchronization of individual vigilance in eastern grey kangaroo. Animal Behaviour 73:595-604.
44. Pays, O., P.-C. Renaud, P. Loisel, M. Petit, J.-F. Gerard, and P. J. Jarman. 2007b. Prey synchronize their vigilant behaviour with other group members. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274:1287-1291.
45. Pöysä, H. 1994. Group foraging, distance to cover and vigilance in the teal, Anas crecca. Animal Behaviour 48:921-928.
46. Proctor, C. J., M. Broom, and G. D. Ruxton. 2003. A communication-based spatial model of antipredator vigilance. Journal of Theoretical Biology 220:123-137.
47. Quenette, P.-Y. 1990. Functions of vigilance in mammals: a review. Acta Oecologica 11:801-818.
48. Quinn, J. L., and W. Cresswell. 2005. Escape response delays in wintering redshank, Tringa totanus, flocks: perceptual limits and economic decisions. Animal Behaviour 69:1285-1292.
49. -. 2006. Testing domains of danger in the selfish herd: sparrowhawks target widely spaced redshanks in flocks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:2521-2526.
50. R Development Core Team. 2007. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org.
51. Roberts, G. 1996. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Animal Behaviour 51:1077-1086.
52. Rodriguez-Gironés, M. A., and R. A. Vàsquez. 2002. Evolutionary stability of vigilance coordination among social foragers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:1803-1810.
53. Sadedin, S. R., and M. A. Elgar. 1998. The influence of flock size and geometry on the scanning behaviour of spotted turtle doves, Streptopelia chinensis. Australian Journal of Ecology 23:177-180.
54. Sirot, E. 2006. Social information, antipredatory vigilance and flight in bird flocks. Animal Behaviour 72:373-382.
55. Ward, P. 1985. Why birds do not coordinate their vigilance. Journal of Theoretical Biology 114:383-385.