Two (or three) is one too many: Testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 2065-2076

  Zellin, Martina ^a   Conci, Markus ^a   von Mühlenen, Adrian ^b   Müller, Hermann J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contextual cueing; Perceptual implicit memory; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80155183227     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0175-x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617-629. doi: 10. 1038/nrn1476.
2. Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143-177. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(82)90007-X.
3. Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 798-815. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 33. 4. 798.
4. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. doi: 10. 1163/156856897X00357.
5. Chua, K.-P., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 72-80. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194784.
6. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178. doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613(00)01476-5.
7. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71. doi: cogp. 1998. 0681/cogp. 1998. 0681.
8. Conci, M., & von Mühlenen, A. (2009). Region segmentation and contextual cuing in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1514-1524. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 71. 7. 1514.
9. Conci, M., Sun, L., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes. Psychological Research, 75, 279-289. doi: 10. 1007/s00426-010-0306-3.
10. Endo, N., & Takeda, Y. (2005). Use of spatial context is restricted by relative position in implicit learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 880-885. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196780.
11. Fiske, S., & Sanocki, T. (2010). Memory and attentional guidance in contextual cueing [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7), 1302a. doi: 10. 1167/10. 7. 1302.
12. Geyer, T., Shi, Z., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 515-532. doi: 10. 1037/a0017448.
13. Hollingworth, A. (2006). Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 58-69. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 32. 1. 58.
14. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105-1124. doi: 10. 1080/02724980042000516.
15. Jiang, Y., Song, J.-H., & Rigas, A. (2005). High-capacity spatial contextual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 524-529. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193799.
16. Jiang, Y., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cuing-configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 454-463. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194893.
17. Jungé, J. A., Scholl, B. J., & Chun, M. M. (2007). How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 15, 1-11. doi: 10. 1080/13506280600859706.
18. Kunar, M. A., Michod, K. O., & Wolfe, J. M. (2005). When we use the context in contextual cueing: Evidence from multiple target locations [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 412a. doi: 10. 1167/5. 8. 412.
19. Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Contextual cost: When a visual-search target is not where it should be. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 216-225. doi: 10. 1080/17470210903281590.
20. Manginelli, A. A., & Pollmann, S. (2009). Misleading contextual cues: How do they affect visual search? Psychological Research, 73, 212-221. doi: 10. 1007/s00426-008-0211-1.
21. Nabeta, T., Ono, F., & Kawahara, J.-I. (2003). Transfer of spatial context from visual to haptic search. Perception, 32, 1351-1358. doi: 10. 1068/p5135.
22. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 520-527. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2007. 09. 009.
23. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273-302. doi: 10. 1080/13506280042000162.
24. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442. doi: 10. 1163/156856897X00366.
25. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495-501. doi: 10. 1038/nrn1411.
26. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 693-716. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 26. 2. 693.