Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 58-69

  Hollingworth, Andrew ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

Context effects; Object recognition; Scene perception; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33244456780     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.58     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal, 40, 309-328.
2. Becker, M. W., & Pashler, H. (2002). Volatile visual representations: Failing to detect changes in recently processed information. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 744-750.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
5. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
6. Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143-177.
7. Boyce, S. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 556-566.
8. Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.
9. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A. (1999). Memory for relational information across eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 919-934.
10. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1995). Memory for structural information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1441-1458.
11. Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559-564.
12. Donnelly, N., & Davidoff, J. (1999). The mental representations of faces and houses: Issues concerning parts and wholes. Visual Cognition, 6, 319-343.
13. Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998, April 9). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
14. Farah, M. J. (1995). Dissociable systems for recognition: A cognitive neuropsychology approach. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 2. Visual cognition (pp. 101-119). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
16. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
18. Gordon, R. D. (2004). Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 760-777.
19. Henderson, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
20. Henderson, J. M. (1997). Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception. Psychological Science, 8, 51-55.
21. Henderson, J. M., & Anes, M. D. (1994). Effects of object-file review and type priming on visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 826-839.
22. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 269-283). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
23. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999a). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271.
24. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999b). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438-443.
25. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003a). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
26. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003b). Eye movements, visual memory, and scene representation. In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes (pp. 356-383). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003c). Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science, 14, 493-497.
28. Henderson, J. M., & Siefert, A. B. (1999). The influence of enantiomorphic transformation on transsaccadic object integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 243-255.
29. Henderson, J. M., & Siefert, A. B. C. (2001). Types and tokens in transsaccadic object identification: Effects of spatial position and left-right orientation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 753-760.
30. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., Jr., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210-228.
31. Hollingworth, A. (2003a). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 388-403.
32. Hollingworth, A. (2003b, November) The structure of scene representations. Talk presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
33. Hollingworth, A. (2004a). [Change detection with and without onset cue.] Unpublished raw data.
34. Hollingworth, A. (2004b). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 519-537.
35. Hollingworth, A. (2005a). Memory for object position in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 1003-1016.
36. Hollingworth, A. (2005b). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 396-411.
37. Hollingworth, A. (in press). Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search. Visual Cognition.
38. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 398-415.
39. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (1999). Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: Evidence from object type and token discrimination. Acta Psychologica, 102, 319-343.
40. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 213-235.
41. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
42. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2003). Testing a conceptual locus for the inconsistent object change detection advantage in real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition, 31, 930-940.
43. Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 761-768.
44. Irwin, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 307-317.
45. Irwin, D. E., & Andrews, R. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 125-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Irwin, D. E., & Gordon, R. D. (1998). Eye movements, attention, and transsaccadic memory. Visual Cognition, 5, 127-155.
47. Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 882-895.
48. Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 683-702.
49. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
50. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
51. Logothetis, N. K., & Pauls, J. (1995). Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 270-288.
52. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1976). Some of the thousand words a picture is worth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 529-540.
53. Mandler, J. M., & Parker, R. E. (1976). Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 38-48.
54. Mandler, J. M., & Ritchey, G. H. (1977). Long-term memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 386-396.
55. McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A., Gerrard, J. L., Gothard, K., Jung, M. W., Knierim, J. J., et al. (1996). Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: The hippocampus as a path integration system. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 173-185.
56. Noles, N., Scholl, B. J., & Mitroff, S. R. (2005). The persistence of object file representations. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 324-334.
57. Olson, I. R., & Jiang, Y. (2004). Visual short-term memory is not improved by training. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1326-1332.
58. Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519-526.
59. Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 441-474.
60. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and the detection of change in visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
61. Pedzek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587-595.
62. Perrett, D. I., Oram, W. M., & Ashbridge, E. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalization of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition, 67, 111-145.
63. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 426-442.
64. Redish, D. A., & Touretzky, D. S. (1997). Cognitive maps beyond the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 7, 15-35.
65. Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
66. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
67. Sacks, D. L., & Hollingworth, A. (2005, May). Attending to original object location facilitates visual memory retrieval. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
68. Schmidt, B. K., Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 754-763.
69. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
70. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74(11, Whole no. 498).
71. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
72. Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583-592.
73. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
74. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H., Zabinski, M., & Blanz, V. (1997). To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in view-point? Psychological Science, 8, 282-289.
75. Tarr, M. J., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? Cognition, 67, 71-108.
76. Tarr, M. J., & Vuong, Q. C. (2002). Visual object recognition. In H. Pashler (Series Ed.) & S. Yantis (Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 1. Sensation and perception (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 287-314). New York: Wiley.
77. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
78. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
79. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. E., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92-114.
80. Zelinsky, G. J., & Loschky, L. C. (2005). Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 676-690.