Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes

Psychological Research

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 279-289

  Conci, Markus ^a   Sun, Luning ^a   Müller, Hermann J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; LEARNING; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79958771764     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0306-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 237-313). San Diego: Academic Press.
2. Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 798-815.
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
4. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006a). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99-108.
5. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006b). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1177-1187.
6. Chua, K., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 72-80.
7. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
8. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
9. Conci, M., & von Mühlenen, A. (2009). Region segmentation and contextual cuing in visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 1514-1524.
10. Geyer, T., Shi, Z., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Contextual cueing in multi-conjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 515-532.
11. Jiang, Y., & Leung, A. W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 100-106.
12. Jiang, Y., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cuing-configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 454-463.
13. Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Contextual cost: when a visual-search target is not where it should be. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 216-225.
14. Manginelli, A. A., & Pollmann, S. (2009). Misleading contextual cues: how do they affect visual search? Psychological Research, 73, 212-221.
15. Ogawa, H., & Kumada, T. (2006). Attentional prioritization to contextually new objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 543-548.
16. Ogawa, H., Takeda, Y., & Kumada, T. (2007). Probing attentional modulation of contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 15, 276-289.
17. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 520-527.
18. Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519-526.
19. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
20. Pisella, L., & Mattingley, J. B. (2004). The contribution of spatial remapping impairments to unilateral visual neglect. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 181-200.
21. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 693-716.