Region segmentation and contextual cuing in visual search

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1514-1524

  Conci, Markus ^a   Von Mühlenen, Adrian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 73449086361     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.7.1514     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BAKER, C. I., OLSON, C. R., & BEHRMANN, M. (2004). Role of attention and perceptual grouping in visual statistical learning. Psychological Science, 15,460-466.
2. BRADY, T. F., & CHUN, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 798-815.
3. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10,433-436.
4. CHUN, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4,170-178.
5. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36,28-71.
6. CHUN, M. M., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). On the functional role of implicit visual memory for the adaptive deployment of attention across scenes. Visual Cognition, 1,65-81.
7. CONCI, M., MÜLLER, H. J., & ELLIOTT, M. A. (2007a). Closure of salient regions determines search for a collinear target configuration. Perception & Psychophysics, 69,32-47.
8. CONCI, M., MÜLLER, H. J., & ELLIOTT, M. A. (2007b). The contrasting impact of global and local object attributes on Kanizsa figure detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 69,1278-1294.
9. DONNELLY, N., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1991). Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 561-570.
10. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
11. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96,433-458.
12. FOUND, A., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1997). Local and global orientation in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 59,941-963.
13. FRIEDMAN-HILL, S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1995). Second-order parallel processing: Visual search for the odd item in a subset. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 531-551.
14. HAN, S., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & CHEN, L. (1999). Parallel and competitive processes in hierarchical analysis: Perceptual grouping and encoding of closure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25,1411-1432.
15. JIANG, Y., & CHUN, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105-1124.
16. JIANG, Y., & LEUNG, A. W (2005). Implicit memory of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12,100-106.
17. JIANG, Y., & WAGNER, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cueing-Configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66,454-463.
18. KAWAHARA, J. (2003). Contextual cueing in 3D layouts defined by binocular disparity. Visual Cognition, 10, 837-852.
19. KOFFKA, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt.
20. KUNAR, M. A., FLUSBERG, S. J., & WOLFE, J. M. (2006). Contextual cuing by global features. Perception & Psychophysics, 68,1204-1216.
21. LLERAS, A., & VON MÜHLENEN, A. (2004). Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spatial Vision, 17,465-482.
22. MOORE, C. M., & EGETH, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence for grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23,339-352.
23. NELSON, R. A., & PALMER, S. E. (2007). Familiar shapes attract attention in figure-ground displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 383-392
24. OLSON, I. R., & CHUN, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9,273-302.
25. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10,437-442.
26. POMERANTZ, J. R., SAGER, L. C., & STOEVER, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configurai superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3,422-435.
27. RAUSEI, V., MAKOVSKI, T., & JIANG, Y. V. (2007). Attention dependency in implicit learning of repeated search context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60,1321-1328.
28. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
29. ROELFSEMA, P. R. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29,203-227.
30. SMYTH, A. C., & SHANKS, D. R. (2008). Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory & Cognition, 36,403-415.
31. SONG, J.-H., & JIANG, Y. (2005). Connecting the past with the present: How do humans match an incoming visual display with visual memory? Journal of Vision, 5,322-330.
32. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
33. VECERA, S. P., & FARAH, M. J. (1997). Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? Perception & Psychophysics, 59,1280-1296.
34. WANG, D. L., KRISTJXNSSON, A., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2005). Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 67,239-253.
35. YESHURUN, Y., KIMCHI, R., SHA'SHOUA, G., & CARMEL, T. (2009). Perceptual objects capture attention. Vision Research, 49,1329-1335.