Differential epithelium DNA damage response to ATM and DNA-PK pathway inhibition in human prostate tissue culture

Cell Cycle

Volumn 10, Issue 20, 2011, Pages 3545-3553

  Zhang, Zhewei ^a   Yang, Zhiming ^a   Jäämaa, Sari ^b,c   Liu, Hester ^a   Pellakuru, Laxmi G ^a   Iwata, Tsuyoshi ^d   Af Hällström, Taija M ^b   De Marzo, Angelo M ^a   Laiho, Marikki ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^d KYOTO PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

ATM; DNA damage; DNA PK; Prostate; H2AX

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; BINDING PROTEIN; CYTOTOXIC AGENT; DNA; HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1; HISTONE H2AX; PROTEIN KAP1; PROTEIN KINASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BASAL CELL; CHROMATIN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; HETEROCHROMATIN; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IONIZING RADIATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROSTATE; PROSTATE EPITHELIUM; TISSUE CULTURE;

EID: 80055121149     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.20.17841     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461:1071-8; PMID:19847258; DOI:10.1038/nature08467.
2. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010; 40:179-204; PMID:20965415; DOI:10.1016/j.molcel. 2010.09.019.
3. Seviour EG, Lin SY. The DNA damage response: Balancing the scale between cancer and ageing. Aging 2010; 2:900-7; PMID:21191148.
4. Hoeijmakers JH. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 2001; 411:366-74; PMID:11357144; DOI:10.1038/35077232.
5. Negrini S, Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. Genomic instability - an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:220-8; PMID:20177397; DOI:10.1038/nrm2858.
6. Meek K, Dang V, Lees-Miller SP. DNA-PK: the means to justify the ends? Adv Immunol 2008; 99:33-58; PMID:19117531; DOI:10.1016/S0065-2776(08)00602-0.
7. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, McDonald ER, 3rd, Hurov KE, Luo J, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007; 316:1160-6; PMID:17525332; DOI:10.1126/science.1140321.
8. Misteli T, Soutoglou E. The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:243-54; PMID:19277046; DOI:10.1038/nrm2651.
9. Polo SE, Jackson SP. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev 2011; 25:409-33; PMID:21363960; DOI:10.1101/gad.2021311.
10. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:5858-68; PMID:9488723; DOI:10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858.
11. Bonner WM, Redon CE, Dickey JS, Nakamura AJ, Sedelnikova OA, Solier S, et al. GammaH2AX and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2008; 8:957-67; PMID:19005492; DOI:10.1038/nrc2523.
12. Stucki M, Jackson SP. gammaH2AX and MDC1: anchoring the DNA-damage-response machinery to broken chromosomes. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:534-43; PMID:16531125; DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.01.012.
13. Kinner A, Wu W, Staudt C, Iliakis G. Gamma-H2AX in recognition and signaling of DNA double-strand breaks in the context of chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:5678-94; PMID:18772227; DOI:10.1093/nar/gkn550.
14. Löbrich M, Shibata A, Beucher A, Fisher A, Ensminger M, Goodarzi AA, et al. gammaH2AX foci analysis for monitoring DNA double-strand break repair: strengths, limitations and optimization. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:662-9; PMID:20139725; DOI:10.4161/cc.9.4.10764.
15. Moon SH, Nguyen TA, Darlington Y, Lu X, Donehower LA. Dephosphorylation of γH2AX by WIP1: an important homeostatic regulatory event in DNA repair and cell cycle control. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:2092-6; PMID:20495376; DOI:10.4161/cc.9.11.11810.
16. Mac rek L, Lindqvist A, Voets O, Kool J, Vos HR, Medema RH. Wip1 phosphatase is associated with chromatin and dephosphorylates gammaH2AX to promote checkpoint inhibition. Oncogene 2010; 29:2281-91; PMID:20101220; DOI:10.1038/onc.2009.501.
17. Xie A, Odate S, Chandramouly G, Scully R. H2AX post-translational modifications in the ionizing radiation response and homologous recombination. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:3602-10; PMID:20703100; DOI:10.4161/cc.9.17.12884.
18. Redon CE, Nakamura AJ, Martin OA, Parekh PR, Weyemi US, Bonner WM. Recent developments in the use of γH2AX as a quantitative DNA double- strand break biomarker. Aging 2011; 3:168-74; PMID:21325706.
19. Groth A, Rocha W, Verreault A, Almouzni G. Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair. Cell 2007; 128:721-33; PMID:17320509; DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.030.
20. Murga M, Jaco I, Fan Y, Soria R, Martinez-Pastor B, Cuadrado M, et al. Global chromatin compaction limits the strength of the DNA damage response. J Cell Biol 2007; 178:1101-8; PMID:17893239; DOI:10.1083/jcb.200704140.
21. Ayoub N, Jeyasekharan AD, Bernal JA, Venkitaraman AR. HP1-beta mobilization promotes chromatin changes that initiate the DNA damage response. Nature 2008; 453:682-6; PMID:18438399; DOI:10.1038/nature06875.
22. Dinant C, Luijsterburg MS. The emerging role of HP1 in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:6335-40; PMID:19805510; DOI:10.1128/MCB.01048- 09.
23. Ziv Y, Bielopolski D, Galanty Y, Lukas C, Taya Y, Schultz DC, et al. Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:870-6; PMID:16862143; DOI:10.1038/ncb1446.
24. Noon AT, Shibata A, Rief N, Löbrich M, Stewart GS, Jeggo PA, et al. 53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:177-84; PMID:20081839; DOI:10.1038/ncb2017.
25. Goodarzi AA, Noon AT, Deckbar D, Ziv Y, Shiloh Y, Löbrich M, et al. ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol Cell 2008; 31:167-77; PMID:18657500; DOI:10.1016/j.molcel. 2008.05.017.
26. Probst AV, Dunleavy E, Almouzni G. Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:192-206; PMID:19234478; DOI:10.1038/nrm2640.
27. Cowell IG, Sunter NJ, Singh PB, Austin CA, Durkacz BW, Tilby MJ. gammaH2AX foci form preferentially in euchromatin after ionising-radiation. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:1057; PMID:17957241; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0001057.
28. Goodarzi AA, Jeggo P, Lobrich M. The influence of heterochromatin on DNA double strand break repair: Getting the strong, silent type to relax. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:1273-82; PMID:21036673; DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.013.
29. Nouspikel T. DNA repair in differentiated cells: some new answers to old questions. Neuroscience 2007; 145:1213-21; PMID:16920273; DOI:10.1016/j. neuroscience.2006.07.006.
30. Fortini P, Dogliotti E. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage in terminally differentiated cells. Mutat Res 2010; 685:38-44; PMID:19941876; DOI:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.11.003.
31. Meulle A, Salles B, Daviaud D, Valet P, Muller C. Positive regulation of DNA double strand break repair activity during differentiation of long life span cells: the example of adipogenesis. PLoS ONE 2008; 3:3345; PMID:18846213; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0003345.
32. Abate-Shen C, Shen MM. Molecular genetics of prostate cancer. Genes Dev 2000; 14:2410-34; PMID:11018010; DOI:10.1101/gad.819500.
33. Kiviharju-af Hällström TM, Laiho M. Genetic changes and DNA damage responses in the prostate. Prostate 2008; 68:902-18; PMID:18324675; DOI:10.1002/pros.20746.
34. De Marzo AM, Nelson WG, Bieberich CJ, Yegnasubramanian S. Prostate cancer: New answers prompt new questions regarding cell of origin. Nat Rev Urol 2010; 7:650-2; PMID:21139640; DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2010.188.
35. Jäämaa S, Af Hällström TM, Sankila A, Rantanen V, Koistinen H, Stenman UH, et al. DNA damage recognition via activated ATM and p53 pathway in nonproliferating human prostate tissue. Cancer Res 2010; 70:8630-41; PMID:20978201; DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0937.
36. Cornish T, Morgan J, Gurel B, De Marzo AM. FrIDA: An open source framework for image dataset analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132:856.
37. Hickson I, Zhao Y, Richardson CJ, Green SJ, Martin NM, Orr AI, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel and specific inhibitor of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase ATM. Cancer Res 2004; 64:9152-9; PMID:15604286; DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2727.
38. Mahaney BL, Meek K, Lees-Miller SP. Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining. Biochem J 2009; 417:639-50; PMID:19133841; DOI:10.1042/BJ20080413.
39. Zhao Y, Thomas HD, Batey MA, Cowell IG, Richardson CJ, Griffin RJ, et al. Preclinical evaluation of a potent novel DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor NU7441. Cancer Res 2006; 66:5354-62; PMID:16707462; DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN- 05-4275.
40. O'Connor MJ, Martin NM, Smith GC. Targeted cancer therapies based on the inhibition of DNA strand break repair. Oncogene 2007; 26:7816-24; PMID:18066095; DOI:10.1038/sj.onc.1210879.
41. White JS, Choi S, Bakkenist CJ. Transient ATM kinase inhibition disrupts DNA damage-induced sister chromatid exchange. Sci Signal 2010; 3:44; PMID:20516478; DOI:10.1126/scisignal.2000758.
42. Wen B, Wu H, Shinkai Y, Irizarry RA, Feinberg AP. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2009; 41:246-50; PMID:19151716;DOI:10.1038/ng.297.
43. Heard E, Rougeulle C, Arnaud D, Avner P, Allis CD, Spector DL. Methylation of histone H3 at Lys-9 is an early mark on the X chromosome during X inactivation. Cell 2001; 107:727-38; PMID:11747809; DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(01) 00598-0.
44. Peters AH, Kubicek S, Mechtler K, O'Sullivan RJ, Derijck AA, Perez-Burgos L, et al. Partitioning and plasticity of repressive histone methylation states in mammalian chromatin. Mol Cell 2003; 12:1577-89; PMID:14690609; DOI:10.1016/S1097- 2765(03)00477-5
45. Wiencke JK, Zheng S, Morrison Z, Yeh RF. Differentially expressed genes are marked by histone 3 lysine 9 trimethylation in human cancer cells. Oncogene 2008; 27:2412-21; PMID:17968314; DOI:10.1038/sj.onc.1210895.
46. Maison C, Almouzni G. HP1 and the dynamics of heterochromatin maintenance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5:296-304; PMID:15071554; DOI:10.1038/nrm1355.
47. Redon CE, Dickey JS, Bonner WM, Sedelnikova OA. gamma-H2AX as a biomarker of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and artificial skin. Adv Space Res 2009; 43:1171-8; PMID:20046946; DOI:10.1016/j.asr.2008.10.011.
48. Shapiro E, Huang H, Ruoff R, Lee P, Tanese N, Logan SK. The heterochromatin protein 1 family is regulated in prostate development and cancer. J Urol 2008; 179:2435-9; PMID:18436254; DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.091.
49. Iacovoni JS, Caron P, Lassadi I, Nicolas E, Massip L, Trouche D, et al. High-resolution profiling of gammaH2AX around DNA double strand breaks in the mammalian genome. EMBO J 2010; 29:1446-57; PMID:20360682; DOI:10.1038/emboj. 2010.38.
50. Kiviharju-af Hällström TM, Jäämaa S, Mönkkönen M, Peltonen K, Andersson LC, Medema RH, et al. Human prostate epithelium lacks Wee1A-mediated DNA damage-induced checkpoint enforcement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:7211-6; PMID:17431037; DOI:10.1073/pnas.0609299104.