A Meta-analysis of 64-section Coronary CT Angiography Findings for Predicting 30-day Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Academic Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1522-1528

  Takakuwa, Kevin M ^a   Keith, Scott W ^a   Estepa, Adrian T ^a   Shofer, Frances S ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

64 slice; Acute coronary syndrome; Chest pain; Coronary CT angiography; Major adverse cardiac events; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 80055120433     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2009 Update. Dallas; AHA: 2009. Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009, 119:480-486. American Heart Association.
2. Pitts S.R., Niska R.W., Xu J., et al. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report 2008, 6:1-38.
3. Tosteson A.N., Goldman L., Udvarhelyi I.S., et al. Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain. Circulation 1996, 94:143-150.
4. Storrow A.B., Gibler W.B. Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2000, 35:449-461.
5. Goldman L., Weinberg M., Weisberg M., et al. A computer-derived protocol to aid in the diagnosis of emergency room patients with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 1982, 307:588-596.
6. Tatum J.L., Jesse R.L., Kontos M.C., et al. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. Ann Emerg Med 1997, 29:116-125.
7. Selker H.P., Beshansky J.R., Griffith J.L., et al. Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. Ann Intern Med 1998, 129:845-855.
8. Chase M., Robey J.L., Zogby K.E., et al. Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population. Ann Emerg Med 2006, 48:252-259.
9. Pope J.H., Aufderheide T.P., Ruthazer R., et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:1163-1170.
10. Schull M., Vermeulen M.J., Stukel T.A. The risk of missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction associated with emergency department volume. Ann Emerg Med 2006, 48:647-655.
11. Leschka S., Alkadhi H., Plass A., et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005, 26:1482-1487.
12. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C.A., et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005, 112:2318-2323.
13. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:552-557.
14. Fine J.J., Hopkins C.B., Ruff N., et al. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006, 97:173-174.
15. Ehara M., Surmely J.F., Kawai M., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006, 70:564-571.
16. Nikolaou K., Knez A., Rist C., et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187:111-117.
17. Schuijf J.D., Pundziute G., Jukema J.W., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006, 98:145-148.
18. Herzog C., Zwerner P.L., Doll J.R., et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007, 244:112-120.
19. Muhlenbruch G., Seyfarth T., Soo C.S., et al. Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 2007, 17:603-609.
20. Oncel D., Oncel G., Tastan A., et al. Detection of significant coronary artery stenosis with 64-section MDCT angiography. Eur J Radiol 2007, 62:394-405.
21. Shabestari A.A., Abdi S., Akhlaghpoor S., et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multislice computed tomography in assessment of significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99:1656-1661.
22. Schlosser T., Mohrs O.K., Magedanz A., et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-detector-row computed tomography in patients with a low to moderate pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. Acta Radiol 2007, 48:300-307.
23. Bayrak F., Guneysu T., Gemici G., et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery stenosis. Acta Cardiol 2008, 63:11-17.
24. Miller J.M., Rochitte C.E., Dewey M., et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:2324-2336.
25. Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1724-1732.
26. Ulimoen G.R., Gjonnaess E., Atar D., et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Acta Radiol 2008, 10:1140-1144.
27. Rixe J., Rolf A., Conradi G., et al. Detection of relevant coronary artery disease using dual-source computed tomography in a high probability patient series: comparison with invasive angiography. Circ J 2009, 73:316-322.
28. Alessandri N., Di Matteo A., Rondoni G., et al. Heart imaging: the accuracy of the 64-MSCT in the detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2009, 13:163-171.
29. Sheikh M., Ben-Nakhi A.M., Shukkur A.M., et al. Accuracy of 64-multidetector-row computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Med Princ Pract 2009, 18:323-328.
30. Sosnowski M., Pysz P., Gola A., et al. Coronary artery visualization using a 64-row multi-slice computed tomography in unselected patients with definite or suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Cardiol J 2009, 16:413-417.
31. Selcoki Y., Yilmaz O.C., Kankilic M.N., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2010, 38:95-100.
32. Tsiflikas I., Brodoefel H., Reimann A.J., et al. Coronary CT angiography with dual source computed tomography in 170 patients. Eur J Radiol 2010, 74:161-165.
33. Mowatt G., Cook J.A., Hillis G.S., et al. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2008, 94:1386-1393.
34. Meijboom W.B., Meijs M.F.L., Schuijf J.D., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:2135-2144.
35. Abdulla J., Asferg C., Kofoed K.F. Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 27:413-420.
36. Papanicolaou M.N., Califf R.M., Hlatky M.A., et al. Prognostic implications of angiographically normal and insignificantly narrowed coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1986, 58:1181-1187.
37. Pitts W.R., Lange R.A., Cigarroa J.E., et al. Repeat coronary angiography in patients with chest pain and previously normal coronary angiogram. Am J Cardiol 1997, 80:1086-1087.
38. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:264-269. PRISMA Group.
39. Leeflang M.M.G., Deeks J.J., Gatsonis C., et al. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:889-897.
40. Chang S.A., Choi S.I., Choi E.K., et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. Am Heart J 2008, 156:375-383.
41. Hoffmann U., Nagurney J.T., Moselewski F., et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 2006, 114:2251-2260.
42. Hollander J.E., Litt H.I., Chase M., et al. Computed tomography coronary angiography for rapid disposition of low-risk emergency department patients with chest pain syndromes. Acad Emerg Med 2007, 14:112-116.
43. Goldstein J.A., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:863-871.
44. Deeks J.J., Macaskill P., Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:882-893.
45. Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002, 21:1539-1558.
46. Johnson T.R., Nikolaou K., Wintersperger B.J., et al. ECG-gated 64-MDCT angiography in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188:76-82.
47. Gallagher M.J., Ross M.A., Raff G.L., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med 2007, 49:125-136.
48. Rubinshtein R., Halon D.A., Gaspar T., et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 2007, 115:1762-1768.
49. Johnson T.R., Nikolaou K., Becker A., et al. Dual-source CT for chest pain assessment. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:773-780.
50. Takakuwa K.M., Halpern E.J. Evaluation of a " triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol: use of 64-section CT in low-to-moderate risk emergency department patients suspected of having acute coronary syndrome. Radiology 2008, 248:438-446.
51. Ueno K., Anzai T., Jinzaki M., et al. Diagnostic capacity of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting with acute chest pain. Cardiology 2009, 112:211-218.
52. Hollander J.E., Chang A.M., Shofer F.S., et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2009, 53:295-304.
53. Hoffmann U., Bamberg F., Chae C.U., et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:1642-1650.
54. Hansen M., Ginns J., Seneviratne S., et al. The value of dual-source 64-slice CT coronary angiography in the assessment of patients presenting to an acute chest pain service. Heart Lung Circulation 2010, 19:213-218.
55. Gianrossi R., Detrano R., Mulvihill D., et al. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation 1989, 80:87-98.
56. Fleischmann K.E., Hunink M.G., Kuntz K.M., et al. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 1998, 280:913-920.
57. Klocke F.J., Baird M.G., Lorell B.H., et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 42:1318-1333.
58. van Houwelingen H.C., Arends L.R., Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med 2002, 21:589-624.