Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1140-1144

  Ulimoen, G R ^a,b   Gjonnaess E ^c   Atar, D ^c   Dahl, T ^c   Stranden, E ^c   Sandbaek G ^c  

^a AKER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b VESTRE VIKEN HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Angiography; Arteriosclerosis; Cardiac; CT; Ischemia infarction

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; ELECTRIC INSTRUMENT TRANSFORMERS; HEMODYNAMICS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MEDICAL IMAGING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY; TURBULENT FLOW;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CARDIAC; COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHIES; CORONARY STENOSISES; CT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACIES; GOLD STANDARDS; IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES; ISCHEMIA/INFARCTION; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; IODIXANOL; IODOBENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGINA, UNSTABLE; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 57149093058     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850802452083     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, Kennedy JW, Kereiakes D, Kern MJ, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2001;103:3019-41.
2. Kolnes K, Velle OH, Hareide S, Hegbom K, Wiseth R. Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography at a local hospital: pitfalls and potential. Acta Radiol 2006;47:680-6.
3. Rodevand O, Hogalmen G, Gudim LP, Indrebo T, Molstad P, Vandvik PO. Limited usefulness of non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-detector multislice computer tomography at a community hospital. Scand Cardiovasc J 2006;40:76-82.
4. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1896-910.
5. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006;296: 403-11.
6. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desboilles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7.
7. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-7.
8. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, Kuttner A, Baum U, Bautz W, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006;97: 343-8.
9. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, van der Hoeven BL, de Roos A, et al, Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:145-8.
10. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al, A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
11. Landis JR, Koch. GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33: 159-74.
12. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van. Mieghem CA, Weustink AC, Pugliese F, van Pelt N, et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with nonST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart 2007;93: 1386-92.
13. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, Van Mieghem C, Meijboom, WB, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006;16: 575-82.
14. Schlosser T, Mohrs OK, Magedanz A, Nowak B, Voigtlander T, Barkhausen J, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-detector-row computed tomography in patients with a low to moderate pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. Acta Radiol 2007;48:300-7.
15. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, Wilde P, Oberhoff M, Karsch KR, et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1840-5.
16. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113:1305-10.