Detection of relevant coronary artery disease using dual-source computed tomography in a high probability patient series : -comparison with invasive angiography-

Circulation Journal

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 316-322

  Rixe, Johannes ^a   Rolf, Andreas ^a   Conradi, Guido ^a   Moellmann, Helge ^a   Nef, Holger ^a   Neumann, Thomas ^a   Steiger, Holger ^a   Hamm, Christian W ^a   Dill, Thorsten ^a  

^a KERCKHOFF HEART CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac imaging; Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Dual source computed tomography; Heart rate control

Indexed keywords

IOPAMIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 59449092551     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0534     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Mollet NR, Cademartin F, Nieman K, Saia F, Lemos PA, McFadden EP, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2265 - 2270.
2. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, Anders K, Ulzheimer S, Ohnesorge B, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003; 107: 664 - 666.
3. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Leber A, Johnson T, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 111 - 117.
4. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552 - 557.
5. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, Kuttner A, Baum U, Bautz W, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64x0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 343 - 348.
6. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 256 - 268.
7. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Bruder H, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual source computed tomography: Initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 331 - 335.
8. Busch S, Nikolaou K, Johnson T, Rist C, Knez A, Reiser M, et al. Quantification of coronary artery stenoses: Comparison of 64-slice and dual source CT angiography with cardiac catheterization. Radiologe 2007; 47: 295 - 300 (in German).
9. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Leber AW, von Ziegler F, Rist C, et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: Initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1409 - 1415.
10. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2739 - 2747.
11. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2354 - 2360.
12. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, Kachelriess M, Ropers D, Giesler T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 2000; 102: 2823 - 2828.
13. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, Pflederer T, Anders K, Daniel WG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006; 114: 2334 - 2341; quiz 2334.
14. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Rofo 2004; 176: 1803 - 1810.
15. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: Impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006; 113: 1305 - 1310.
16. Deetjen AG, Möllmann S, Conradi G, Rolf A, Schmermund A, Hamm CW, et al. Use of Automatic exposure control in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries: Comparison of 16-slice and 64-slice scanner data with conventional coronary angiography. Heart 2007; 93: 1040 - 1043.
17. Dill T, Deetjen A, Ekinci O, Mollmann S, Conradi G, Kluge A, et al. Radiation dose exposure in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol 2008; 124: 307 - 311.
18. Hoffmann MH, Lessick J, Manzke R, Schmid FT, Gershin E, Boll DT, et al. Automatic determination of minimal cardiac motion phases for computed tomography imaging: Initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 365 - 373.
19. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: First experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1482 -1487.
20. Leschka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM, Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Koepfli P, et al. Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1964 - 1972.
21. Matsutani H, Sano T, Kondo T, Morita H, Arai T, Sekine T, et al. ECG-edit function in multidetector-row computed tomography coronary arteriography for patients with arrhythmias. Circ J 2008; 72: 1071 - 1078.
22. Nagatani Y, Takahashi M, Takazakura R, Nitta N, Murata K, Ushio N, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography: Optimization of image reconstruction phase according to the heart rate. Circ J 2007; 71: 112 - 121.
23. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51(Suppl): 5 - 40.
24. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: Executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1341 - 1381.
25. Akabame S, Hamaguchi M, Tomiyasu K, Tanaka M, Kobayashi- Takenaka Y, Nakano K, et al. Evaluation of vulnerable coronary plaques and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by 64-detector multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Circ J 2008; 72: 618 -625.
26. Hara T, Yamada S, Hayashi T, Ikeda Y, Yamashiro K, Mizutani K, et al. Accuracy of nonstenotic coronary atherosclerosis assessment by multi-detector computed tomography. Circ J 2007; 71: 911 - 914.
27. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Anno H, Sugiura A, Ito Y, Mori K, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by 0.5-mm-slice multislice computed tomographic imaging. Circ J 2007; 71: 363 - 366.
28. Becker A, Leber A, Becker C, Knez A. Predictive value of coronary calcifications for future cardiac events in asymptomatic individuals. Am Heart J 2008; 155: 154 - 160.
29. Dragano N, Verde PE, Moebus S, Stang A, Schmermund A, Roggenbuck U, et al. Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis is more pronounced in men and women with lower socio-economic status: Associations in a population-based study: Coronary atherosclerosis and social status. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007; 14: 568 - 574.
30. Matsumoto N, Sato Y, Yoda S, Nakano Y, Kunimasa T, Matsuo S, et al. Prognostic value of non-obstructive CT low-dense coronary artery plaques detected by multislice computed tomography. Circ J 2007; 71: 1898 - 1903.
31. Cordeiro MA, Miller JM, Schmidt A, Lardo AC, Rosen BD, Bush DE, et al. Non-invasive half millimetre 32 detector row computed tomography angiography accurately excludes significant stenoses in patients with advanced coronary artery disease and high calcium scores. Heart 2006; 92: 589 - 597.
32. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Mollet NR, Luccichenti G, Belgrano M, Bartolotta TV, et al. Impact of intravascular enhancement, heart rate, and calcium score on diagnostic accuracy in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Radiol Med (Torino) 2005; 110:42 - 51.
33. Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E, Mennicke M, et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast- enhanced multidetector CT: Influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 911 - 916.
34. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, Eichler K, Hammerstingl R, Dogan S, et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: Influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006; 238: 75 - 86.
35. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, Katoh O, Matsubara T, Terashima M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: Comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006; 70: 564 - 571.
36. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolaou K, Paul S, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 147 - 154.
37. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 2318 - 2323.
38. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, van Mieghem C, Meijboom WB, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 575 - 582.
39. Flohr T, Ohnesorge B. Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 907 - 923.
40. Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ. Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2005; 235: 756 - 773.
41. Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T, Anders K, Kuettner A, Stilianakis NI, et al. Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual- source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 2393 - 2398.
42. Husmann L, Schepis T, Scheffel H, Gaemperli O, Leschka S, Valenta I, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low, intermediate, and high cardiovascular risk. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 452 - 461.