Coronary artery visualization using a 64-row multi-slice computed tomography in unselected patients with definite or suspected coronary artery disease: A comparison with invasive coronary angiography

Cardiology Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 413-417

  Sosnowski, Maciej ^a,b   Pysz, Piotr ^a,b   Gola, Artur ^a   Szymański, Leszek ^a,b   Tendera, Michał ^b  

^a Upper Silesian Heart Center Katowice   (Poland)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Multislice computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BREATHING RATE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PROBABILITY; VASCULAR PATENCY;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; ARTIFACTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349665573     PISSN: 18975593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging. Magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation, 2008; 118: 586-606.
2. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. CCF/ACR/SCCT//SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/ SCAI/SIR: 2006 Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48: 1475-1497.
3. Poon M, Rubin GD, Achenbach S et al. Consensus update on the appropriate usage of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. J Invasive Cardiol, 2007; 19: 484-490.
4. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP Audet A-M et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: Executive summary and recommendations. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Circulation, 1999; 99: 2345-2357.
5. Andreini D, Pontone G, Pepi M et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49: 2044-2050.
6. Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R, Riddel JW, Hamon M. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: A meta-analysis. Eur Radiol, 2008; 18: 217-225.
7. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med, 1979; 300: 1350-1358.
8. Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low-to-intermediate risk. Radiol Med (Torino), 2007; 112: 969-981.
9. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50: 1469-1475.
10. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med, 2008; 359: 2324-2336.
11. Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology, 2003; 229: 749-756.
12. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49: 2204-2210.
13. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J, 2007; 28: 2354-2360.