Bayes and blickets: Effects of knowledge on causal induction in children and adults

Cognitive Science

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1407-1455

  Griffiths, Thomas L ^a   Sobel, David M ^b   Tenenbaum, Joshua B ^c   Gopnik, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Causal induction; Cognitive development; Knowledge effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BAYES THEOREM; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 80055111459     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01203.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ahn, W., & Kalish, C. W. (2000). The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 199-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bonawitz, E. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2010). Deconfounding hypothesis generation and evaluation in Bayesian models. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 2260-2265). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
4. Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209-254). New York: Academic Press.
5. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6. Catena, A., Maldonado, A., & Cándido, A. (1998). The effect of the frequency of judgment and the type of trial on covariation learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 481-495.
7. Chapman, G. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 837-854.
8. Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405.
9. Cheng, P. W. (2000). Causal reasoning. In R. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of cognitive sciences (pp. 106-108). Cambridge, MA: Bradford, MIT Press.
10. Cole, R. P., Barnet, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (1995). Effect of relative stimulus validity: Learning or performance deficit? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 293-303.
11. Danks, D. (2003). Equilibria of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 109-121.
12. Danks, D., Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2003). Dynamical causal learning. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 15 (pp. 35-42). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60-80.
14. Dickinson, A., & Shanks, D. R. (1995). Instrumental action and causal representation. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 5-25). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
15. Fernbach, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. (2009). Causal learning with local computations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 678-693.
16. Friedman, N., & Koller, D. (2003). Being Bayesian about Bayesian network structure: A Bayesian approach to structure discovery in Bayesian networks. Machine Learning, 50, 95-125.
17. Glymour, C. (1998). Learning causes: Psychological explanations of causal explanation. Minds and Machines, 8, 39-60.
18. Glymour, C. (2001). The mind's arrows: Bayes nets and graphical causal models in psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Glymour, C. (2003). Learning, prediction, and causal Bayes nets. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 43-48.
20. Glymour, C., & Cheng, P. W. (1998). Causal mechanism and probability: A normative approach. In Y. Oaksford & V. Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition (pp. 295-313). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21. Goldvarg, E., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Naive causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 565-610.
22. Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 1-30.
23. Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L. E. (2007). Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, computation. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Gopnik, A., & Sobel, D. M. (2000). Detecting blickets: How young children use information about causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Development, 71, 1205-1222.
25. Gopnik, A., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L., & Glymour, C. (2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two, three, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37, 620-629.
26. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
27. Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 285-386.
28. Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Two proposals for causal grammars. In A. Gopnik & L. Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation (pp. 323-345). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
29. Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review, 116, 661-716.
30. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
31. Kamin, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. In M.R. Jones (Eds.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior, 1967: Aversive Stimulation (pp. 9-31). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
32. Kruschke, J. K., & Blair, N. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 636-645.
33. Kushnir, T., & Gopnik, A. (2007). Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Developmental Psychology, 43, 186-196.
34. Larkin, M. J. W., Aitken, M. R. F., & Dickinson, A. (1998). Retrospective revaluation of causal judgments under positive and negative contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1331-1352.
35. Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265-288.
36. Lovibond, P. F., Been, S., Mitchell, C. J., Bouton, M. E., & Frohardt, R. (2003). Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude. Memory & Cognition, 31, 133-142.
37. Lu, H., Yuille, A., Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Modeling causal learning using Bayesian generic priors on generative and preventive powers. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 519-524). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Lu, H., Yuille, A., Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Bayesian models of judgments of causal strength: A comparison. In D. S. McNammara & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1241-1246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Lu, H., Yuille, A., Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2008). Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. Psychological Review, 115, 955-984.
40. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
41. McCormack, T., Butterfill, S., Hoerl, C., & Burns, P. (2009). Cue competition effects and young children's causal and counterfactual inferences. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1563-1575.
42. Miller, R. R., & Matute, H. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 370-386.
43. Mitchell, C. J., Killedar, A., & Lovibond, P. F. (2005). Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 418-424.
44. Newsome, G. L. (2003). The debate between current versions of covariation and mechanism approaches to causal inference. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 87-107.
45. Novick, L. R., & Cheng, P. W. (2004). Assessing interactive causal influence. Psychological Review, 111, 455-485.
46. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychology Review, 94, 61-73.
47. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
48. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Pinker, S. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7, 217-282.
50. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
51. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & The PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Sanborn, A. N., Griffiths, T. L., & Navarro, D. J. (2010). Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review, 117, 1144-1167.
53. Schulz, L. E., Bonawitz, E. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2007). Can being scared make your tummy ache? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence and preschoolers' causal inferences. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1124-1139.
54. Seiver, E., Gopnik, A., Lucas, C., & Goodman, N. D. (2007). Causal inference and the origins of social cognition-Preschool children use covariation to make trait attributions. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, March 29 - April 1.
55. Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 1-21.
56. Shanks, D. R. (1995). Is human learning rational? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48, 257-279.
57. Shultz, T. R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(1). Serial No. 194.
58. Sobel, D. M., & Munro, S. A. (2009). Domain generality and specificity in children's causal inferences about ambiguous data. Developmental Psychology, 45, 511-524.
59. Sobel, D. M., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gopnik, A. (2004). Children's causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science, 28, 303-333.
60. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001). Causation, prediction, and search (Springer lecture notes in statistics, 2nd Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Tenenbaum, J. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2001). Structure learning in human causal induction. In T. Leen, T. Dietterich, & V. Tresp (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 13 (pp. 59-65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006). Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 309-318.
63. Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., Niyogi, S. (2007). Intuitive theories as grammars for causal inference. In A. Gopnik, & L. Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
64. Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127-151.
65. Ward, W. C., & Jenkins, H. M. (1965). The display of information and the judgment of contingency. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 19, 231-241.
66. Wasserman, E. A., & Berglan, L. R. (1998). Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgment: The role of within-compound associations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 51, 121-138.
67. Wasserman, E. A., Elek, S. M., Chatlosh, D. L., & Baker, A. G. (1993). Rating causal relations: Role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 174-188.
68. Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82-111.
69. Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007a). Sensitivity to sampling Bayesian word learning. Developmental Science, 10, 288-297.
70. Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007b). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245-272.
71. Yuille, A., & Kersten, D. (2006). Vision as Bayesian inference: Analysis by synthesis? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 301-308.