Biological Significance in Forward and Backward Blocking: Resolution of a Discrepancy between Animal Conditioning and Human Causal Judgment

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 125, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 370-386

  Miller, Ralph R ^a   Matute, Helena ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 0030456642     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.370     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allan, L. G. (1993). Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative? Psychological Bulletin, 114, 435-448.
2. Balaz, M. A., Gutsin, P., Cacheiro, H., & Miller, R. R. (1981). Blocking as a retrieval failure: Reactivation of associations to a blocked stimulus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 99-113.
3. Bonardi, C., Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1990). Context specificity of conditioning in flavor-aversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 229-237.
4. Chapman, G. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 837-854.
5. Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, B, 49B, 60-80.
6. Dickinson, A., & Charnock, D. J. (1985). Contingency effects with maintained instrumental reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 397-416.
7. Dickinson, A., Shanks, D., & Evenden, J. (1984). Judgment of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 29-50.
8. Gibbon, J., & Balsam, P. (1981). Spreading association in time. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219-253). New York: Academic Press.
9. Hall, G., Mackintosh, N. J., Goodall, G., & Dal Martello, M. (1977). Loss of control by a less valid or by a less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 8, 145-158.
10. Hume, D. (1964). Treatise of human nature (L. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). London: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739)
11. Kamin, L. J. (1965). Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical conditioning (pp. 118-147). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12. Kamin, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9-31). Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.
13. Kao, S-F., & Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Assessment of an information integration account of contingency judgment with examination of subjective cell importance and method of information presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1363-1386.
14. Kaufman, M. A., & Belles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 318-320.
15. Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning and Behavior, 4, 186-192.
16. Markman, A. B. (1989). LMS rules and the inverse base-rate effect: Comments on Gluck and Bower (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 417-121.
17. Martin, I., & Levey, A. B. (1991). Blocking observed in human eyelid conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 233-256.
18. Matzel, L. D., Schachtman, T. R., & Miller, R. R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 16, 398-412.
19. Miller, R. R., Hallam, S. C., & Grahame, N. J. (1990). Inflation of comparator stimuli following CS training. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 434-443.
20. Miller, R. R., Kasprow, W. J., & Schachtman, T. R. (1986). Retrieval variability: Sources and consequences. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 145-218.
21. Miller, R. R., & Matute, H. (1996). Testing the Revised Rescorla-Wagner model's explanation of backward blocking. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Miller, R. R., & Schachtman, T. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Miller, R. R., Schachtman, T. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). [Failure to attenuate blocking by posttraining extinction of a blocking stimulus]. Unpublished raw data.
25. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
26. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27. Revusky, S. H. (1971). The role of interference in association over a delay. In W. K. Honig & P. H. R. James (Eds.), Animal memory (pp. 155-213). New York: Academic Press.
28. Rizley, R. C., & Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81, 1-11.
29. Schweitzer, L., & Green, L. (1982). Reevaluation of things past: A test of the "retrospective hypothesis" using a CER procedure in rats. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 17, 62-68.
30. Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 1-21.
31. Shanks, D. R., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 229-261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Tassoni, C. J. (1995). The least mean squares network with information coding: A model of cue learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 193-204.
33. Van Hamme, L. J. (1994). Associative and statistical accounts of cue competition in causality judgments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
34. Van Hamme, L. J., Kao, S-F., & Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Judging interevent relations: From cause to effect and from effect to cause. Memory & Cognition, 21, 802-808.
35. Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127-151.
36. Wagner, A. R., Logan, F. A., Haberlandt, K., & Price, T. (1968). Stimulus selection and a "modified continuity theory." Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171-180.
37. Wasserman, E. A. (1990). Attribution of causality to common and distinctive elements of compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 1, 298-302.
38. Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Comparative cognition: Toward a general understanding of cognition in behavior. Psychological Science, 4, 156-161.
39. Williams, D. A., Sagness, K. E., & McPhee, J. E. (1994). Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 694-709.