Entrepreneurial architecture: A blueprint for entrepreneurial universities

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 341-353

  Nelles, Jen ^a   Vorley, Tim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurial architectures; Entrepreneurial university; Higher education policy; University entrepreneurship

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055096405     PISSN: 08250383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.186     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Acs, Z.J., & Audretsch, D.B. (2001). The Emergence of the Entrepreneurial Society. Stockholm: Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research.
2. Agasistia, T., & Catalano, G. (2006). Governance models of university systems-towards quasi-markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28, 245-262. (Pubitemid 44665606)
3. Audretsch, D.B., & Thurik, R.A. (2001). What's new about the New Economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 267-315. (Pubitemid 32292369)
4. Bains, W. (2005). How academics can make (extra) money out of their science. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 11, 353-363. (Pubitemid 41300307)
5. Bercowitz, J., Feldman, M., Feller, I., & Burton, R. (2001). Organizational structure as a determinant of academic patent and licensing behavior: An exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State University. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 21-35. (Pubitemid 33809463)
6. Burns, P. (2005). Corporate Entrepreneurship: Building an Entrepreneurial Organization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Burns, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2nd Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
8. Busenitz, L.W., West, P., Shepherd, D.A., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship in emergence: fourteen years of entrepreneurship research in management journals. Journal of Management, 29, 285-308.
9. Chandler, A.D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
10. Clark, B.R. (1998a). Creating entrepreneurial universities organizational pathways of transformation. New York: IAU Press.
11. Clark, B.R. (1998b). The entrepreneurial university: demand and response. Tertiary Education and Management, 4, 5-16.
12. Clark, B.R. (2001). The Entrepreneurial University: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 9-24.
13. Clark, B.R. (2004). Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in Case Studies and Concepts. Maindenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
14. Collins, S., & Wakoh, H. (2000). Universities and technology transfer in Japan. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 213-222.
15. Cooke, P. (2004). University Research and Regional Development. A Report to the European Commission, Research Director-General.
16. Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34, 321-342. (Pubitemid 40612709)
17. Del Campo, A.A., Sparks, A., Hill, R.C., & Keller, R.T. (1999). The transfer and commercialisation of university-developed medical imaging technology: Opportunities and problems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46(3), 289-299.
18. Douglas, D. (2004). Grounded Theory and the 'And' in Entrepreneurship Research Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2, 59-69.
19. Drucker, P. (1969). The Age of Discontinuity; Guidelines to Our changing Society. Harper and Row: New York.
20. Edqvist, O. (2003). Layered science and science policies. Minerva, 41, 207-221. (Pubitemid 41341975)
21. Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21, 198-233.
22. Etzkowitz, H. (1989). Entrepreneurial science in the academy: A case of the transformation of norms. Social Problems, 36, 14-29.
23. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27, 823-833. (Pubitemid 128419003)
24. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109-121.
25. Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1, 64-77.
26. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A Triple Helix of university-industry-government Relations. Minerva, 36, 203-288.
27. Etzkowitz, H., Asplund, P., & Nordman, N. (2001). Beyond Humboldt: Emergence of academic entrepreneurship in the US and Sweden. CERUM Working Paper Nr 27. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from the Centre for Regional Science at Umeå University http://www.umu.se/cerum
28. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution from ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
29. Feldman, M.P., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J., & Burton, R. (2002). Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Science, 48, 105-121. (Pubitemid 34434358)
30. Foucault, M. (1971). Revolutionary action: Until now a discussion with Michel Foucault. Actuel, 14, 42-47.
31. Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management and location Matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 17-30.
32. Glaser, B.G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Sociology Press: Mill Valley, CA.
33. Glennerster, H. (1991). Quasi-markets for education? The Economic Journal, 10, 1268-1276.
34. Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29, 273-278.
35. Harvey, D. (1998). University Inc. The Atlantic Monthly, 282, 112-116.
36. Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32, 1555-1568.
37. Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The Academic Revolution. New York: Doubleday.
38. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303-324.
39. Kay, J.A. (1993). Foundations of Corporate Success: How Business Strategies Add Value. Oxford: OUP.
40. Kenny, M. (1986). Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex, New Haven: Yale University Press.
41. Kerr, C. (1963). The Uses of the University. London: Harvard University Press.
42. Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the Third Mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities. Higher Education Policy, 20, 441-456.
43. Leys, J.M. (2000). University Inc-the New World Order. Paper presented at the Australasian Association for Institutional Research (AAIR) 11th International Conference, Sydney 6 December.
44. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043-1057. (Pubitemid 41260501)
45. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Marginson, S. (2000). Rethinking academic work in the global era. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22, 23-35.
47. Markman, G.D., Phan, P.H., Balkin, D.B., & Gianiodis, P.T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241-263. (Pubitemid 39473695)
48. Mawson, J. (2007). Research councils, universities and local government: Building bridges. Public Money and Management, 27, 265-272.
49. Meek, L. (2000). Diversity and marketisation of higher education: incompatible concepts? Higher Education Policy, 13, 23-39.
50. Mowery, D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat, B.N., & Ziedonis, A.A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by the U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30, 99-119. (Pubitemid 33676869)
51. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N., & Ziedonis, A.A. (2004). Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation. University- Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
52. Murray, J.A. (1984). A concept of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 1-13.
53. Nelles, J., & Vorley, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial Architecture in UK Higher Education Institutions: Consolidating the Third Mission. Paper presented at the DRUID 25th Celebration Conference 2008 on Entrepreneurship and Innovation- Organizations, Institutions, Systems and Regions, Copenhagen, CBS, Denmark, June 17-20. http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id= 3275&cf=29
54. OECD. (1996). The Knowledge-based Economy. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and development.
55. OECD. (2007). Higher Education and Regions: Globally Competitive, Locally Engaged. Paris: OECD.
56. OECD. (2008). Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society- Volume 1. Paris: OECD.
57. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W.W. (2001). To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 99-114. (Pubitemid 33809468)
58. Pilbeam, C. (2008). Designing an Entrepreneurial University in an Institutional Setting. Higher Education Policy, 21, 393-404.
59. Powers, J.B., & McDougall, P.P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291-311. (Pubitemid 40076486)
60. Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
61. Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S.D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 691-791. (Pubitemid 47323947)
62. Sampat, B.N., & Nelson, R.R. (1999). The Emergence and Standardization of University Technology Transfer Offices: A Case Study of Institutional Change. Paper presented at the International Society for the New Institutional Economics (ISNIE) World Bank, Washington D.C. September 16-18.
63. Siegel, D., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48.
64. Siegel, D., Waldman, D., Atwater, & Link, A. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialisation of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142.
65. Siegel, D. (2006). Technology Entrepreneurship: Institutions and Agents Involved in University Technology Transfer (vol. 1) Edgar Elgar: London.
66. Shane, S. (2004). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 127-151. (Pubitemid 37378817)
67. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226.
68. Shinn, T. (2002). The Triple Helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32, 599-614. (Pubitemid 36725507)
69. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
70. Stone, D. (2002). Using Knowledge: the dilemmas of 'Bridging Research and Policy. Compare, 32, 285-296.
71. Trakman, L. (2008). Modelling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62, 63-83.
72. Thurik, R.A., & Wennekers, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11, 140-150.
73. Tuunainen, J. (2005). Hybrid practices? Contributions to the debate on the mutation of science and university. Higher Education, 50, 275-298. (Pubitemid 41202930)
74. Vorley, T., & Nelles, J. (2008). (Re)Conceptualising the academy: Institutional development of and beyond the Third Mission. Higher Education Management and Policy. 20, 109-126.
75. Webster, A., & Etzkowitz, H. (1991). Academic-industry relations: the second academic revolution? : A framework paper for the proposed research workshop on academic-industry relations. London: Science Policy Support Group.
76. Weingart, P. (1997). From 'Finalization' to 'Mode 2': Old wine in new bottles? Social Science Information, 36, 591-613. (Pubitemid 127364437)
77. Weiss, C.H. (1979). The Many Meanings of Research Utilization. Public Administration Review, 39, 426-431.
78. Wolfe, D.A. (2005). The role of universities in regional development and cluster formation. In G.A. Jones, P.L. McCarney, & M.L. Skolnik (Eds.), Creating Knowledge, Strengthening Nations: The Changing Role of Higher Education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
79. Yusuf, S. (2001). University-industry links: policy dimensions In S. Yusuf & K. Nabeshima (Eds.), How Universities Promote Economic Growth (pp. 1-25). Washington, DC: The World Bank.