Hybrid practices? Contributions to the debate on the mutation of science and university

Higher Education

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 275-298

  Tuunainen, Juha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Hybrid practices; Scientific research; Transformation; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944437401     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-6355-z     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
2. Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. London: Heinemann.
3. Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Louis, K.S. and Wise, D. (1986a). 'Industrial support of university research in biotechnology', Science 231 (4735), 242-246.
4. Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Seashore Louis, K., Stoto, M.A. and Wise, D. (1986b). 'University - industry research relationships in biotechnology: Implications for the university', Science 232(4756), 1361-1366.
5. Busch, L., Lacy, W.B., Burkhardt, J. and Lacy, L.R. (1991). Plants, Power, and Profit: Social, Economic and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
6. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: IAU Press and Pergamon.
7. Clarke, A.E. and Fujimura, J.H. (eds.) (1992). The Right Tools for the Job. At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8. Curry, J. and Kenney, M. (1990). 'Land-grant university-industry relationships in biotechnology: A comparison with the non-land-grant research universities', Rural Sociology 55(1), 44-57.
9. Deem, R. and Johnson, R. (2003). 'Risking the university? Learning to be a manager-academic in UK universities', Sociological Research Online 8(3). Available online at: 〈http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/3/deem.html〉
10. Elzinga, A. (2002). 'The New Production of Reductionism in Models Relating to Research Policy'. Paper to the Nobel Symposium, Science and Industry in the 20th Century, Stockholm, 21-23 November, 2002 at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
11. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). 'The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university - industry linkages', Research Policy 27(8), 823-833.
12. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). 'Incubation of incubators: Innovation as a triple helix of university - industry - government networks', Science and Public Policy 29(2), 115-128.
13. Etzkowitz, H. (2003a). 'Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations', Social Science Information 42(3), 293-337.
14. Etzkowitz, H. (2003b). 'Research groups as "Quasi-firms": The invention of the entrepreneurial university', Research Policy 32(1), 109-121.
15. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). 'The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations', Research Policy 29(2), 109-123.
16. Etzkowitz, H., Schuler, J., Eugene, and Gulbrandsen, M. (2000a). 'The evolution of the entrepreneurial university', in Jacob, M. and Hellström, T. (eds.), The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, pp. 40-60.
17. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Cantisano Terra, B.R. (2000b). 'The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm', Research Policy 29(2), 313-330.
18. Fujimura, J.H. (1996). Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Geiger, R.L. (1988). 'Milking the sacred cow: Research and the quest for useful knowledge in the American University since 1920', Science, Technology, and Human Values 13(3-4), 332-348.
20. Gibbons, M. (2000). 'Mode 2 society and the emergence of context sensitive science', Science and Public Policy 27(3), 159-163.
21. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
22. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Gieryn, T.F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Godin, B. (1998). 'Writing performative history: The new New Atlantis?', Social Studies of Science 28(3), 465-483.
25. Gottweis, H. (1998). Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
26. Häyrinen-Alestalo, M. (1999). 'The university under the pressure of innovation policy -reflecting on European and Finnish experiences', Science Studies 12(1), 44-69.
27. Jansen, J.D. (2002). 'Mode 2 knowledge and institutional life: Taking Gibbons on a walk through a South African University', Higher Education 43(4), 507-521.
28. Kekäle, J. (1997). Leadership Cultures in Academic Departments. Joensuu: The University of Joensuu.
29. Kenney, M. (1986). Biotechnology: The University - Industrial Complex. New Haven: Yale University Press.
30. Kimmelman, B.A. (1992). 'Organisms and interests in scientific research: R. A. Emerson's claims for the unique contributions of agricultural genetics', in Clarke, A.E. and Fujimura, J.H. (eds.), The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 198-232.
31. Kleinman, D.L. (2003). Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
32. Kleinman, D.L. and Vallas, S.P. (2001). 'Science, capitalism, and the rise of the "Knowledge Worker": The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States', Theory and Society 30, 451-492.
33. Knorr Cetina, K. (1982). 'Scientific communities or transepistemic Arenas of research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science', Social Studies of Science 12, 101-130.
34. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Kraak, A. (ed.) (2000a). Changing Modes: New Knowledge Production and its Implications for Higher Education in South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
36. Kraak, A. (2000b). 'Investigating new knowledge production: A South African higher education survey', in Kraak, A. (ed.), Changing Modes: New Knowledge Production and its Implications for Higher Education in South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council, pp. 128-155.
37. Krimsky, S., Ennis, J.G. and Weissman, R. (1991). 'Academic - corporate ties in biotechnology: A quantitative study', Science, Technology, and Human Values 16(3), 275-287.
38. Krohn, W. and van den Daele, W. (1998). 'Science as an agent of change: Finalization and experimental implementation', Social Science Information 37(1), 191-222.
39. Krücken, G. (2002). 'Panta Rei - Re-thinking science, re-thinking society', Science as Culture 11(1), 125-130.
40. Krücken, G. (2003). 'Learning the "New, New Thing": On the role of path dependency in university structures', Higher Education 46(3), 315-339.
41. Lacey, H. (2000). 'Seeds and the knowledge they embody'. Peace Review 12(4), 563-569.
42. Laiho, M., Lappalainen, M. and Saxén, L. (1996). Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research in Finland. Tampere: The Academy of Finland.
43. Lenoir, T. (1997). Instituting Science. The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
44. Leydesdorff, L. (1996). 'Luhmann's sociological theory: Its operationalization and future perspectives', Social Science Information 35(2), 283-306.
45. Leydesdorff, L. (2000). 'The Triple Helix: An evolutionary model of innovations', Research Policy 29, 243-255.
46. Marginson, S. and Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Miettinen, R. (1998). 'Object construction and networks in research work: The case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes', Social Studies of Science 28(3), 423-463.
48. Miettinen, R. (2002). National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric. Helsinki: Edita.
49. Muller, J. (2000). 'What knowledge is of the most worth for the Millennial citizen?', in Kraak, A. (ed.), Changing Modes: New Knowledge Production and Its Implications for Higher Education in South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council, pp. 70-87.
50. Noro, A. (2000). 'Aikalaisdiagnoosi sosiologisen teorian kolmantena lajityyppinä', Sosiologia 37(4), 321-329.
51. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
52. Packer, K. and Webster, A. (1996). 'Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility', Science, Technology, and Human Values 21(4), 427-453.
53. Pickering, A. (ed.) (1992). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
54. Rappert, B. and Webster, A. (1997). 'Regimes of ordering: The commercialization of intellectual property rights in industrial - Academic Collaborations', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 9(2), 115-130.
55. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
56. Rip, A. (2000). 'Fashions, Lock-ins and the heterogeneity of knowledge production', in Jacob, M. and Hellström, T. (eds.), The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, pp. 28-39.
57. Rosset, P.M. and Altieri, M.A. (1997). 'Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture', Society and Natural Resources 10, 283-295.
58. Shinn, T. (1999). 'Change or Mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science', Social Science Information 38(1), 149-176.
59. Shinn, T. (2002). 'The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology', Social Studies of Science 32(4), 599-614.
60. Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L.L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
61. Subotzky, G. (1999). 'Alternatives to the entrepreneurial university: New modes of knowledge production in community service programs', Higher Education 38(4), 401-440.
62. Tuunainen, J. (2001). 'Constructing objects and transforming experimental systems', Perspectives on Science 9(1), 78-105.
63. Tuunainen, J. (2002). 'Reconsidering the mode 2 and triple helix: A critical comment based on a case study', Science Studies 15(2), 36-58.
64. Tuunainen, J. (2005). 'When disciplinary worlds collide: The organizational ecology of disciplines in a university department', Symbolic Interaction, 28(2).
65. Tuunainen, J. (in press). 'Contesting a hybrid firm at a traditional University', Social Studies of Science.
66. Webster, A.J. (1994). 'University - corporate ties and the construction of research Agendas', Sociology 28(1), 123-142.
67. Weingart, P. (1997). 'From "Finalization" to "Mode 2": Old wine in new bottles?', Social Science Information 36(4), 591-613.
68. Ylijoki, O.-H. (2003). 'Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideas and practices of university research', Higher Education 45(3), 307-335.
69. Ziman, J. (2000). 'Postacademic science: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms', in Segerstråhle, U. (ed.), Beyond the Science Wars: The Missing Discourse About Science and Society. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 135-154.