The nature of the visual environment induces implicit biases during language-mediated visual search

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1068-1084

  Huettig, Falk ^a,b   Mcqueen, James M ^a,b,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Eye movements; References; Semantic representations; Visual representations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HEARING; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80055051167     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0086-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419-439.
2. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73,247-264.
3. Biederman, I., Blickle, T. W., Teitelbaum, R. C., & Klatsky, G. J. (1988). Object search in nonscene displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 456-467.
4. Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143-177.
5. Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84-107.
6. Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 453-459.
7. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
8. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123,71-99.
9. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2004). The online processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head-mounted eye-tracking. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond (pp. 187-207). New York: Psychology Press.
10. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, 23-32.
11. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2007). Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition, 15,985-1018.
12. Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 460-482.
13. Huettig, F., Olivers, C. N. L., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (in press). Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. Acta Psychologica. doi:10.1016/j. actpsy.2010.07.013
14. Huettig, F., Quinlan, P. T., McDonald, S. A., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2006). Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. Acta Psychologica, 121, 65-80.
15. Huettig, F., Rommers, J., and Meyer, A. S. (in press). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
16. Intraub, H. (1984). Conceptual masking: The effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 115-125.
17. Loftus, G. R., & Ginn, M. (1984). Perceptual and conceptual masking of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 435-441.
18. Matin, E., Shao, K., & Boff, K. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 372-380.
19. McQueen, J. M., & Viebahn, M. (2007). Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 661-671.
20. Meyer, A. S., Belke, E., Telling, A. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Early activation of object names in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 710-716.
21. Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2007). Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 494-503.
22. Moss, H. E., McCormick, S., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). The time course of activation of semantic information during spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 695-731.
23. Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1-21.
24. Norris, D., Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., & Butterfield, S. (2006). Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 146-193.
25. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1998). Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 401-418.
26. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2, 509-522.
27. Salverda, A. P., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). Tracking the time course of orthographic information in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36,1108-1117.
28. Saslow, M. G. (1967). Latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 1030-1033.
29. Schreuder, R., Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Glazenborg, G. (1984). Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming. Psychological Research, 45, 339-354.
30. Shelton, J. R., & Martin, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1191-1210.
31. Smith, M. C., & McGee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time-course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 109, 373-392.
32. Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (1996). Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1166-1177.
33. Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (1999). On the myth of automatic semantic activation in reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 61-65.
34. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
35. Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371-386.
36. Williams, J. N. (1996). Is automatic priming semantic? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 113-161.
37. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
38. Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1-14.