Arm control recovery enhanced by error augmentation

IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Abdollahi, Farnaz ^a   Rozario, Sylvester V ^a   Kenyon, Robert V ^a   Patton, James L ^a,b   Case, Emily ^b   Kovic, Mark ^b   Listenberger, Molly ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

arm reaching; biofeedback; error augmentation; hemiparesis; human stroke rehabilitation therapy; robotics control; virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ARM REACHING; CLINICAL MEASURE; CROSSOVER DESIGN; HEMIPARESIS; INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY; ROBOTICS CONTROL; STROKE REHABILITATION; TRACKING DEVICES; VISUAL DISPLAY; VISUAL TARGETS;

BIOFEEDBACK; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; ROBOTS; USER INTERFACES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ROBOTICS;

ARM; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

HUMANS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 80055025809     PISSN: 19457898     EISSN: 19457901     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975504     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. E. Taub, et al., "Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation-a clinical review. [see comments]," Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, vol. 36, pp. 237-51, 1999.
2. E. Taub, et al., "Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke," Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 74, pp. 347-354, 1993.
3. R. J. Nudo and K. M. Friel, "Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation," Revue Neurologique, vol. 155, pp. 713-7, 1999.
4. R. J. Nudo, "Recovery after damage to motor cortical areas," Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 9, pp. 740-7, 1999.
5. C. M. Dean and R. B. Shepherd, "Task Related Training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke: A randomize controlled trial," Stroke, vol. 28, pp. 722-728, 1997.
6. R. E. Hanlon, "Motor learning following unilateral stroke," Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 77, pp. 811-5, 1996.
7. T. Jarus and T. Gutman, "Effects of cognitive processes and task complexity on acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skills," Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 68, pp. 280-9, Dec 2001.
8. E. Bisson, et al., "Functional balance and dual-task reaction times in older adults are improved by virtual reality and biofeedback training," Cyberpsychol & Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 16-23, Feb 2007.
9. R. Boian, et al., "Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation," Studies in Health Technology & Informatics, vol. 85, pp. 64-70, 2002.
10. G. C. Burdea, "Virtual rehabilitation-benefits and challenges," Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 42, pp. 519-23, 2003.
11. W. S. Harwin, et al., "Challenges and Opportunities for Robot-Mediated Neurorehabilitation," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, pp. 1717 - 1726, 2006.
12. R. J. Sanchez, et al., "Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravityreduced environment," IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems & Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 378-89, Sep 2006.
13. B. T. Volpe, et al., "Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke," Current Neurology & Neuroscience Reports, vol. 5, pp. 465-70, Nov 2005.
14. B. Brewer, et al., "Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion," IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems & Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 1-11, 2005.
15. Y. Rossetti, et al., "Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect," Nature, vol. 395, pp. 166-9, 1998.
16. Y. Wei, et al., "Visual Error Augmentation for Enhancing Motor Learning and Rehabilitative Relearning," in IEEE-International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Chicago, IL, USA, 2005.
17. J. L. Emken and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Robot-Enhanced Motor Learning: Accelerating Internal Model Formation During Locomotion by Transient Dynamic Amplification," IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems & Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 33-39, 2005 2005.
18. J. L. Patton, et al., "Custom-designed haptic training for restoring reaching ability to individuals with stroke," Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 43, pp. 643-656, 2006.
19. J. L. Patton, et al., "Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 168, pp. 368-383, 2006.
20. J. L. Patton, et al., "Exploiting the natural adaptive capacity of the nervous system for motor learning & rehabilitation," in From Basic Motor control to Functional Recovery IV, N. Gantchev, Ed., ed Sofia, Bulgaria: Martin Drinov Academic Publishing House, 2005, pp. 272-280.
21. Y. Wei, et al., "A real-time haptic/graphic demonstration of how error augmentation can enhance learning," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Barcelona, 2005.
22. M. Kawato, "Feedback-error-learning neural network for supervised learning," in Advanced neural computers, R. Eckmiller, Ed., ed Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990, pp. 365-372.
23. D. M. Wolpert, et al., "An internal model for sensorimotor integration," Science, vol. 269, pp. 1880-2, 1995.
24. J. L. Patton, et al., "Robotics and virtual reality: A perfect marriage for motor control research and rehabilitation," Assistive Technology, vol. 18, pp. 181-195, 2006.
25. N. Cothros, et al., "Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics?," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 173, pp. 689-97, Sep 2006.
26. M. Desmurget, et al., "Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies," Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 77, pp. 1644-50, 1997.
27. M. D. Ellis, et al., "Position-dependent torque coupling and associated muscle activation in the hemiparetic upper extremity," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 176, pp. 594-602, 2007.
28. T. Rahman, et al., "body-powered functional upper limb orthosis," Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 37, pp. 675-680, 2000.
29. S. Lisberger, "The neural basis for the learning of simple motor skills," Science, vol. 242, pp. 728-735, 1988.
30. D. E. Rumelhart, et al., "Learning representations by back-propagating errors," Nature (London), vol. 323, pp. 533-536, 1986.
31. A. Johnson, et al., "Developing the PARIS: Using the cave to prototype a new VR display," ACM Symposium on Immersive Projection Technology, Ames, Iowa, 2000.
32. J. Sanford, et al., "Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke," Physical Therapy, vol. 73, pp. 447-54, 1993.